Trading Ping (PING) perpetual futures offers a way to speculate on price movements without owning the underlying cryptocurrency. MEXC perpetual futures allow traders to go long or short with leverage up to 500x, providing significant flexibility for both beginner and experienced traders. Understanding Ping (PING) perpetual futures trading on MEXC can help beginners navigate this advanced trading instrument effectively.

Recent market activity for PING perpetual futures on MEXC has shown extremely high volatility, with 24-hour price swings exceeding 35% and trading volumes surpassing $2 million, reflecting strong trader interest and rapid price movements in the Ping token market. Notably, individual traders have realized profits exceeding $675,000 in short timeframes, underscoring the speculative nature and opportunity in PING futures trading.

What Are Ping (PING) Perpetual Futures on MEXC?

Perpetual futures are derivative contracts with no fixed expiration date, allowing traders to hold positions indefinitely until they manually close them or are forcibly liquidated. On MEXC, Ping (PING) perpetual futures use a funding rate mechanism to keep contract prices aligned with the spot market. Funding fees are settled every 8 hours at 00:00 UTC, 08:00 UTC, and 16:00 UTC, with no fees charged by MEXC itself—funding fees are exchanged directly between users holding Ping positions.

MEXC's Ping (PING) Perpetual Trading Features

MEXC offers two types of perpetual contracts for Ping (PING):

  • USDT-M futures: Use USDT as both margin and settlement currency for PING trading.
  • Coin-M futures: Use PING as collateral.

The platform charges 0% maker fees and only 0.02% taker fees for Ping futures, making it highly cost-effective for frequent PING traders. MEXC supports both Simple Mode and Advanced Mode, allowing users to select different leverage multipliers and margin modes for long and short PING positions independently.

Advanced Margin Options for Ping (PING) Trading

MEXC recently launched Multi-Asset Margin mode, supporting 14 tokens including BTC, ETH, SOL, USDT, USDC, and DOGE. This feature allows Ping traders to use multiple cryptocurrencies as collateral without converting them to settlement currency. The system automatically offsets profits and losses across PING positions, enhancing account resilience against volatility and reducing liquidation risks. Stablecoins like USDT enjoy 100% collateral rates, while major tokens like BTC have tiered rates starting at 97.5%.

Leverage and Position Management for Ping (PING)

MEXC supports leverage from 1x to 500x for PING USDT-M perpetual futures and up to 200x for PING Coin-M contracts. Users can set different leverage multipliers for long and short Ping positions independently, and the platform supports both isolated and cross margin modes. The exchange has introduced Take-Profit Reverse and Stop-Loss Reverse features specifically designed to help PING traders capitalize on short-term market trends.

Risk Management for Ping (PING) Perpetual Trading

MEXC provides five order types for Ping (PING) risk management:

  • Limit
  • Market
  • Trigger
  • Trailing stop
  • Post-only orders

The platform supports both one-way and hedge modes, with hedge mode allowing simultaneous long and short positions on the same PING contract. In isolated margin mode, each Ping position has independent margin accounts, ensuring losses from one position don't affect others. Always start with small PING positions and low leverage while learning, and never risk more than you can afford to lose.

Conclusion

Trading Ping (PING) perpetual futures on MEXC provides access to institutional-grade tools with beginner-friendly features. The platform's zero maker fees, advanced margin options, and high leverage capabilities make it suitable for various PING trading strategies. With over 40 million users across 170+ countries, MEXC continues to innovate in Ping futures trading. For those ready to start, Ping (PING) perpetual futures trading offers a dynamic and flexible way to engage with the cryptocurrency market.

Market Opportunity
Ping Logo
Ping Price(PING)
$0.006934
$0.006934$0.006934
-6.06%
USD
Ping (PING) Live Price Chart

Description:Crypto Pulse is powered by AI and public sources to bring you the hottest token trends instantly. For expert insights and in-depth analysis, visit MEXC Learn.

The articles shared on this page are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily represent the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for prompt removal.

MEXC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

Latest Updates on Ping

View More
As a facilitator, how should PAYAI build a positive flywheel?

As a facilitator, how should PAYAI build a positive flywheel?

Author: Haotian Many people have seen the positive flywheel of $PING building Mintpad on top of MEME, but how should we draw the positive flywheel pie belonging to $PAYAI (@PayAINetwork)? One solution is: To put it bluntly, Facilitator's current predicament boils down to one thing: a lack of sustainable value capture. It's just doing the dirty work of paying gas and packaging transactions onto the blockchain, making it hard to see any greater potential. (Note: A facilitator is a coordinating role in a payment network that facilitates transactions.) But isn't this precisely Facilitator's opportunity to "expand"? In my opinion, Facilitator will evolve first as a sub-segment of x402. How to shed its pure "tool attributes" and become a "value routing node of the payment network" is a proposition worth exploring in the long term. Several possible future variants of Facilitator: 1) The Facilitator or routing layer doesn't necessarily need to be a self-developed Facilitator. Instead, it creates a Facilitator Marketplace, allowing third-party Facilitators to compete and establish unified SLA service standards and pricing mechanisms. It takes a cut of platform transactions, similar to the router channels in Dex, selecting the best based on preference. The goal is to become the Facilitator protocol layer of the x402 ecosystem. Currently, this seems to be the best embodiment of xEcho @agileadtodark's "Pay to X" empowerment logic. 2) Payment Data Trust Relay Layer: Once an Agent or individual has accumulated a large amount of transaction data, connecting to the ERC-8004 authentication layer naturally leads to Agent reputation scoring, abnormal transaction identification, merchant risk profiles, and other value enhancements in risk control. I know that service solutions such as @eigencloud AVS verification service and @ProjectZKM, which uses ZK as a general verification layer, are attempting to establish a trust relay layer for Facilitators. 3) Value-added service layers such as escrow, batch processing, and "mining" address transitional needs for high-frequency, low-value payment scenarios, or before the Agent's high-performance chain is fully operational. These include off-chain accounting and on-chain batch settlement to reduce gas consumption, provide delayed escrow transactions, and unavoidable compliance solutions, and even incentive activities designed to stimulate payment processing. Essentially, this pushes the Facilitator towards a "cross-chain bridge + payment gateway + incentive layer" model, placing it more within the value-added service relay layer. ...In fact, there are many more variations. To avoid being seen as wishful thinking or self-indulgence, a crucial premise must be established for all these ideas: a significant increase in payment requests, transaction volume, and the proliferation of Facilitators and application aggregators. At that point, these familiar "composable" vehicles from the DeFi space will all be reassembled and stacked again in the x402 space!
2025/11/12
Is Timothée Chalamet’s Sports Comedy A Winner?

Is Timothée Chalamet’s Sports Comedy A Winner?

The post Is Timothée Chalamet’s Sports Comedy A Winner? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Timothée Chalamet in “Marty Supreme.” A24 Reviews are out for Marty Supreme, starring Timothée Chalamet in a movie loosely based on table tennis champ Marty Reisman. What are Rotten Tomatoes critics saying about it? While Marty Supreme doesn’t open in theaters until Dec. 25, the review embargo for the film was lifted on Monday. The official logline for Marty Supreme reads, “Marty Mauser (Chalamet), a young man with a dream no one respects, goes to hell and back in pursuit of greatness.” ForbesAwards Season: NBR, NYFCC Picks And Critics’ Choice Nods This WeekBy Tim Lammers Directed by Josh Safdie, the ping pong period comedy also stars Gwyneth Paltrow, Odessa A’zion, Kevin O’Leary, Tyler Okonma (aka Tyler, The Creator), Abel Ferrara and Fran Drescher. As of the publication of this article, Marty Supreme has earned a 96% “fresh” critics’ score on Rotten Tomatoes based on 51 reviews. The RT Critics Consensus, Popcornmeter score and audience summary are still pending. What Are Individual Critics Saying About ‘Marty Supreme’? Peter Debruge of Variety is among the top critics on RT who gives Marty Supreme a “fresh” score, writing in his review summary, “In the defining performance of his still-burgeoning career, Timothée Chalamet — aka ‘Marty Supreme’ — makes you want to believe in this instantly iconic character too … even if sometimes you also want to strangle him.” David Ehrlich of IndieWire also praises Chalamet in his fresh review summary on RT, writing, “Chalamet makes one of the most colossal movie performances of the 21st century seem as natural as a lay-up.” The Hollywood Reporter’s David Rooney also declares Marty Supreme a big winner on RT, writing in his “fresh” review summary, “As a kinetic portrait of a life in perpetual motion, Marty Supreme is a wonder.” ForbesHere Are Netflix’s Top 10 Most-Viewed…
2025/12/02
P180B likely lost to ‘ghost’ projects since 2016, senator says

P180B likely lost to ‘ghost’ projects since 2016, senator says

LOSSES due to “ghost” or non-existent flood control projects were estimated at P180 billion since 2016, Senator Panfilo “Ping” M. Lacson, who heads the Senate committee probing anomalous projects, claimed on Wednesday. “We are looking at 30,000 flood control projects since 2016. If we extrapolate based on earlier findings that more than 600 out of […]
2025/12/03
View More