The post Jupiter Exchange Amends Lending Risk Disclosure appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Jupiter Exchange acknowledges claims of “zero contagion risk” were inaccurate. Claims of vault security were previously promoted but later retracted. Community and competitors question the risk model’s integrity. Jupiter Exchange’s COO Kash Dhanda addressed inaccuracies about the ‘zero contagion risk’ in Jupiter Lend, acknowledging asset recollateralization issues, following community concerns and Kamino Finance’s criticism. This admission impacts trust and risk management in DeFi markets, highlighting lender competition and potential vulnerabilities in Solana’s ecosystem due to asset rehypothecation. Community Backlash and Competitive Repercussions Community reaction intensified after Jupiter Exchange deleted a controversial claim about their lending model, which originally promoted a “zero contagion risk.” Dhanda later clarified in a platform video that Jupiter Lend uses recollateralized assets, contradicting its initial marketing. Due to the revised claims, Solana’s Kamino Finance reacted by blocking Jupiter Lend’s migration tool, citing misleading risk model assertions. This highlights potential systematic risks posed by recollateralized assets, which may affect user trust and lending practices within the Solana ecosystem. Kamino’s actions sparked further debate in the Solana community, questioning the integrity of Jupiter Lend’s risk models. Kash Dhanda stated in a video, “These vaults are indeed isolated,” but admitted recollateralization exists, prompting varied industry responses regarding transparency standards. Kash Dhanda, COO, Jupiter, acknowledging the “zero contagion risk” claim: “This claim [zero contagion risk] … was inaccurate and that the protocol does rely on rehypothecation to boost yields.” Jupiter Token Drop and Regulatory Concerns Rise Did you know? The issue with Jupiter Lend’s recollateralization recalls historical parallel events in DeFi, where under-disclosed rehypothecation led to market disruptions, mirroring the wildcat banking era’s risks. As of December 7, 2025, the Jupiter (JUP) token saw its price at $0.23 and faced a 33.06% decline over the past 30 days, according to CoinMarketCap. The token holds a market cap of… The post Jupiter Exchange Amends Lending Risk Disclosure appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Jupiter Exchange acknowledges claims of “zero contagion risk” were inaccurate. Claims of vault security were previously promoted but later retracted. Community and competitors question the risk model’s integrity. Jupiter Exchange’s COO Kash Dhanda addressed inaccuracies about the ‘zero contagion risk’ in Jupiter Lend, acknowledging asset recollateralization issues, following community concerns and Kamino Finance’s criticism. This admission impacts trust and risk management in DeFi markets, highlighting lender competition and potential vulnerabilities in Solana’s ecosystem due to asset rehypothecation. Community Backlash and Competitive Repercussions Community reaction intensified after Jupiter Exchange deleted a controversial claim about their lending model, which originally promoted a “zero contagion risk.” Dhanda later clarified in a platform video that Jupiter Lend uses recollateralized assets, contradicting its initial marketing. Due to the revised claims, Solana’s Kamino Finance reacted by blocking Jupiter Lend’s migration tool, citing misleading risk model assertions. This highlights potential systematic risks posed by recollateralized assets, which may affect user trust and lending practices within the Solana ecosystem. Kamino’s actions sparked further debate in the Solana community, questioning the integrity of Jupiter Lend’s risk models. Kash Dhanda stated in a video, “These vaults are indeed isolated,” but admitted recollateralization exists, prompting varied industry responses regarding transparency standards. Kash Dhanda, COO, Jupiter, acknowledging the “zero contagion risk” claim: “This claim [zero contagion risk] … was inaccurate and that the protocol does rely on rehypothecation to boost yields.” Jupiter Token Drop and Regulatory Concerns Rise Did you know? The issue with Jupiter Lend’s recollateralization recalls historical parallel events in DeFi, where under-disclosed rehypothecation led to market disruptions, mirroring the wildcat banking era’s risks. As of December 7, 2025, the Jupiter (JUP) token saw its price at $0.23 and faced a 33.06% decline over the past 30 days, according to CoinMarketCap. The token holds a market cap of…

Jupiter Exchange Amends Lending Risk Disclosure

2025/12/07 08:37
Key Points:
  • Jupiter Exchange acknowledges claims of “zero contagion risk” were inaccurate.
  • Claims of vault security were previously promoted but later retracted.
  • Community and competitors question the risk model’s integrity.

Jupiter Exchange’s COO Kash Dhanda addressed inaccuracies about the ‘zero contagion risk’ in Jupiter Lend, acknowledging asset recollateralization issues, following community concerns and Kamino Finance’s criticism.

This admission impacts trust and risk management in DeFi markets, highlighting lender competition and potential vulnerabilities in Solana’s ecosystem due to asset rehypothecation.

Community Backlash and Competitive Repercussions

Community reaction intensified after Jupiter Exchange deleted a controversial claim about their lending model, which originally promoted a “zero contagion risk.” Dhanda later clarified in a platform video that Jupiter Lend uses recollateralized assets, contradicting its initial marketing.

Due to the revised claims, Solana’s Kamino Finance reacted by blocking Jupiter Lend’s migration tool, citing misleading risk model assertions. This highlights potential systematic risks posed by recollateralized assets, which may affect user trust and lending practices within the Solana ecosystem.

Kamino’s actions sparked further debate in the Solana community, questioning the integrity of Jupiter Lend’s risk models. Kash Dhanda stated in a video, “These vaults are indeed isolated,” but admitted recollateralization exists, prompting varied industry responses regarding transparency standards.

Kash Dhanda, COO, Jupiter, acknowledging the “zero contagion risk” claim: “This claim [zero contagion risk] … was inaccurate and that the protocol does rely on rehypothecation to boost yields.”

Jupiter Token Drop and Regulatory Concerns Rise

Did you know? The issue with Jupiter Lend’s recollateralization recalls historical parallel events in DeFi, where under-disclosed rehypothecation led to market disruptions, mirroring the wildcat banking era’s risks.

As of December 7, 2025, the Jupiter (JUP) token saw its price at $0.23 and faced a 33.06% decline over the past 30 days, according to CoinMarketCap. The token holds a market cap of $712.88 million and a max supply of 7 billion. Trading volume fell by 37.38% in 24 hours, with CoinMarketCap data underpinning these figures.

Jupiter(JUP), daily chart, screenshot on CoinMarketCap at 00:30 UTC on December 7, 2025. Source: CoinMarketCap

Coincu research team highlights that regulatory scrutiny may increase as platforms reassess transparency in risk disclosures. As the Solana ecosystem evolves, protocols are expected to adapt security and risk management practices aligning with broader industry demands.

Source: https://coincu.com/news/jupiter-exchange-lending-risk-disclosure/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26