The post South Korea Plans Bank-Led Consortia for Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea’s regulators are advancing plans to limit Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to bank-led consortia, requiring commercial banks to hold at least 51% stakes. This framework aims to safeguard financial stability and monetary policy while issuing the Digital Asset Basic Act by early 2025. South Korea stablecoin regulation mandates bank-majority consortia for issuance, ensuring oversight by established financial institutions. The initiative involves coordination between lawmakers, the Financial Services Commission, and banking representatives to balance innovation with risk management. With a draft bill deadline of December 10, 2024, passage is expected in January 2025, amid concerns from the Bank of Korea about non-bank issuers. South Korea stablecoin regulation advances with bank-led consortia for Korean-won-pegged assets. Discover the framework’s impact on digital assets and financial stability—stay informed on upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act developments. What is South Korea’s Proposed Stablecoin Regulation Framework? South Korea stablecoin regulation focuses on restricting the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to specialized consortia where commercial banks maintain a controlling interest of at least 51%. This approach, discussed in a key meeting on December 1, 2024, involving the Democratic Party of Korea, the Financial Services Commission, and banking leaders, seeks to integrate stablecoins into the national financial system securely. By prioritizing banks, the framework addresses risks to monetary policy and deposit protection while supporting the broader Digital Asset Basic Act. How Will Bank-Led Consortia Shape Stablecoin Issuance in South Korea? The proposed structure transforms stablecoin issuance into a collaborative effort dominated by banks, aiming to mitigate the threats posed by unregulated digital assets. According to Kang Junhyun, secretary of the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee from the Democratic Party, the consortium model resolves debates by aligning the Bank of Korea, Financial Services Commission, and industry stakeholders. This setup ensures that stablecoins function more like supervised digital deposits, potentially stabilizing the ecosystem… The post South Korea Plans Bank-Led Consortia for Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. South Korea’s regulators are advancing plans to limit Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to bank-led consortia, requiring commercial banks to hold at least 51% stakes. This framework aims to safeguard financial stability and monetary policy while issuing the Digital Asset Basic Act by early 2025. South Korea stablecoin regulation mandates bank-majority consortia for issuance, ensuring oversight by established financial institutions. The initiative involves coordination between lawmakers, the Financial Services Commission, and banking representatives to balance innovation with risk management. With a draft bill deadline of December 10, 2024, passage is expected in January 2025, amid concerns from the Bank of Korea about non-bank issuers. South Korea stablecoin regulation advances with bank-led consortia for Korean-won-pegged assets. Discover the framework’s impact on digital assets and financial stability—stay informed on upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act developments. What is South Korea’s Proposed Stablecoin Regulation Framework? South Korea stablecoin regulation focuses on restricting the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to specialized consortia where commercial banks maintain a controlling interest of at least 51%. This approach, discussed in a key meeting on December 1, 2024, involving the Democratic Party of Korea, the Financial Services Commission, and banking leaders, seeks to integrate stablecoins into the national financial system securely. By prioritizing banks, the framework addresses risks to monetary policy and deposit protection while supporting the broader Digital Asset Basic Act. How Will Bank-Led Consortia Shape Stablecoin Issuance in South Korea? The proposed structure transforms stablecoin issuance into a collaborative effort dominated by banks, aiming to mitigate the threats posed by unregulated digital assets. According to Kang Junhyun, secretary of the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee from the Democratic Party, the consortium model resolves debates by aligning the Bank of Korea, Financial Services Commission, and industry stakeholders. This setup ensures that stablecoins function more like supervised digital deposits, potentially stabilizing the ecosystem…

South Korea Plans Bank-Led Consortia for Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance

2025/12/03 09:54
  • South Korea stablecoin regulation mandates bank-majority consortia for issuance, ensuring oversight by established financial institutions.

  • The initiative involves coordination between lawmakers, the Financial Services Commission, and banking representatives to balance innovation with risk management.

  • With a draft bill deadline of December 10, 2024, passage is expected in January 2025, amid concerns from the Bank of Korea about non-bank issuers.

South Korea stablecoin regulation advances with bank-led consortia for Korean-won-pegged assets. Discover the framework’s impact on digital assets and financial stability—stay informed on upcoming Digital Asset Basic Act developments.

What is South Korea’s Proposed Stablecoin Regulation Framework?

South Korea stablecoin regulation focuses on restricting the issuance of Korean-won-pegged stablecoins to specialized consortia where commercial banks maintain a controlling interest of at least 51%. This approach, discussed in a key meeting on December 1, 2024, involving the Democratic Party of Korea, the Financial Services Commission, and banking leaders, seeks to integrate stablecoins into the national financial system securely. By prioritizing banks, the framework addresses risks to monetary policy and deposit protection while supporting the broader Digital Asset Basic Act.

How Will Bank-Led Consortia Shape Stablecoin Issuance in South Korea?

The proposed structure transforms stablecoin issuance into a collaborative effort dominated by banks, aiming to mitigate the threats posed by unregulated digital assets. According to Kang Junhyun, secretary of the National Assembly’s Political Affairs Committee from the Democratic Party, the consortium model resolves debates by aligning the Bank of Korea, Financial Services Commission, and industry stakeholders. This setup ensures that stablecoins function more like supervised digital deposits, potentially stabilizing the ecosystem but limiting flexibility for non-bank players.

Data from the Bank of Korea highlights the urgency: non-bank issuers could disrupt traditional banking by mimicking narrow bank operations, issuing currency alongside payment services without full regulatory buffers. For instance, the central bank’s recent warnings emphasize that such entities might undermine financial stability, with potential impacts on the 1.2 trillion South Korean won in circulating stablecoin equivalents reported in late 2024. Expert analysts from the Korea Institute of Finance note that bank involvement could enhance trust, drawing parallels to successful models in jurisdictions like the European Union.

However, this bank-centric model raises questions about innovation. Fintech advocates argue it may stifle competition, confining stablecoins to basic transactional roles rather than enabling advanced applications in decentralized finance or cross-border remittances. The Financial Services Commission’s post-meeting statement underscores that no final decisions have been made, signaling ongoing negotiations to refine the consortium’s operational guidelines.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Are the Key Requirements for Issuing Korean-Won-Pegged Stablecoins Under South Korea’s New Rules?

Under the proposed South Korea stablecoin regulation, issuers must form consortia with commercial banks holding over 51% of shares, ensuring robust oversight and compliance with national monetary policies. This setup prioritizes financial stability, as outlined in discussions by the Democratic Party and Financial Services Commission, preventing risks from unregulated entities.

Why Is the Bank of Korea Concerned About Non-Bank Stablecoin Issuers?

The Bank of Korea views non-bank stablecoin issuers as potential threats to monetary sovereignty and financial systems because they operate like narrow banks, issuing digital currency without traditional safeguards. This could erode deposit protections and complicate policy implementation, as highlighted in the central bank’s advisory reports from November 2024.

Key Takeaways

  • Bank-Dominated Consortia: Requiring over 51% bank ownership in stablecoin issuers to fortify regulatory control and protect the Korean won’s integrity.
  • Legislative Timeline: Government must submit a draft Digital Asset Basic Act by December 10, 2024, with potential lawmaker-led passage if delayed, targeting enactment in January 2025.
  • Balancing Act: While addressing Bank of Korea’s stability concerns, the framework may limit fintech innovation—monitor for adjustments in ongoing stakeholder dialogues.

Conclusion

South Korea’s stablecoin regulation marks a pivotal shift toward integrating digital assets under bank-led oversight, with the consortium model central to the Digital Asset Basic Act. By prioritizing financial security and addressing Bank of Korea warnings, this framework positions the nation as a leader in balanced crypto governance. As the December 10 deadline approaches, stakeholders should prepare for enhanced compliance, potentially unlocking safer innovations in the Korean-won-pegged stablecoin space—engage with evolving policies to navigate this transformative era.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/south-korea-plans-bank-led-consortia-for-korean-won-stablecoin-issuance

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October

CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October

The post CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. CME Group is preparing to launch options on SOL and XRP futures next month, giving traders new ways to manage exposure to the two assets.  The contracts are set to go live on October 13, pending regulatory approval, and will come in both standard and micro sizes with expiries offered daily, monthly and quarterly. The new listings mark a major step for CME, which first brought bitcoin futures to market in 2017 and added ether contracts in 2021. Solana and XRP futures have quickly gained traction since their debut earlier this year. CME says more than 540,000 Solana contracts (worth about $22.3 billion), and 370,000 XRP contracts (worth $16.2 billion), have already been traded. Both products hit record trading activity and open interest in August. Market makers including Cumberland and FalconX plan to support the new contracts, arguing that institutional investors want hedging tools beyond bitcoin and ether. CME’s move also highlights the growing demand for regulated ways to access a broader set of digital assets. The launch, which still needs the green light from regulators, follows the end of XRP’s years-long legal fight with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. A federal court ruling in 2023 found that institutional sales of XRP violated securities laws, but programmatic exchange sales did not. The case officially closed in August 2025 after Ripple agreed to pay a $125 million fine, removing one of the biggest uncertainties hanging over the token. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication. Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/cme-group-solana-xrp-futures
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:55