The post Saylor Opposes Zcash-Style Bitcoin Privacy appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Highlights: Michael Saylor has opposed Zcash style privacy on Bitcoin. StarkNet aims to grow the Bitcoin economy through Layer 2 scaling. The privacy debate centers on balancing anonymity with regulatory transparency. Eli Ben-Sasson, the co-founder of the privacy coin Zcash and key developer behind StarkNet, said that Michael Saylor from MicroStrategy (now known as Strategy) is not in the favor of adding Zcash-style privacy features to Bitcoin through a social media post on X today, December 5, 2025. According to Ben-Sasson, Saylor told him on their first meeting that Bitcoin should not include that kind of privacy, because if transactions become too hidden, governments might see it as a threat and try to shut Bitcoin down. First conversation with @saylor: I explained Starknet’s mission: Grow the Bitcoin Economy. How Bitcoiners (and DATs) can participate by staking, generating yield in STRK, and working with that. As Bitcoin GDP grows, fees –> STRK validators –> yield to DAT stock holders. I… pic.twitter.com/rieBh55nf1 — Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io (@EliBenSasson) December 5, 2025 The tweet highlights a major debate within the Bitcoin community which questions if Bitcoin should become more private like Zcash, or should it stay transparent enough to keep regulators comfortable? Supporters of privacy say anonymity protects financial freedom. Critics, on the other hand, worry that too much privacy could trigger government backlash and hurt Bitcoin’s global adoption. The Privacy Debate: Security vs. Censorship Resistance Michael Saylor’s concern is that if Bitcoin becomes completely private, like Zcash, where all transaction details are hidden, governments around the world might react badly. He worries that if authorities can not see what is happening on the network, they could accuse Bitcoin of enabling crime and then try to shut down miners, nodes, or even ban the network. Eli Ben-Sasson and other privacy supporters disagree… The post Saylor Opposes Zcash-Style Bitcoin Privacy appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Highlights: Michael Saylor has opposed Zcash style privacy on Bitcoin. StarkNet aims to grow the Bitcoin economy through Layer 2 scaling. The privacy debate centers on balancing anonymity with regulatory transparency. Eli Ben-Sasson, the co-founder of the privacy coin Zcash and key developer behind StarkNet, said that Michael Saylor from MicroStrategy (now known as Strategy) is not in the favor of adding Zcash-style privacy features to Bitcoin through a social media post on X today, December 5, 2025. According to Ben-Sasson, Saylor told him on their first meeting that Bitcoin should not include that kind of privacy, because if transactions become too hidden, governments might see it as a threat and try to shut Bitcoin down. First conversation with @saylor: I explained Starknet’s mission: Grow the Bitcoin Economy. How Bitcoiners (and DATs) can participate by staking, generating yield in STRK, and working with that. As Bitcoin GDP grows, fees –> STRK validators –> yield to DAT stock holders. I… pic.twitter.com/rieBh55nf1 — Eli Ben-Sasson | Starknet.io (@EliBenSasson) December 5, 2025 The tweet highlights a major debate within the Bitcoin community which questions if Bitcoin should become more private like Zcash, or should it stay transparent enough to keep regulators comfortable? Supporters of privacy say anonymity protects financial freedom. Critics, on the other hand, worry that too much privacy could trigger government backlash and hurt Bitcoin’s global adoption. The Privacy Debate: Security vs. Censorship Resistance Michael Saylor’s concern is that if Bitcoin becomes completely private, like Zcash, where all transaction details are hidden, governments around the world might react badly. He worries that if authorities can not see what is happening on the network, they could accuse Bitcoin of enabling crime and then try to shut down miners, nodes, or even ban the network. Eli Ben-Sasson and other privacy supporters disagree…

Saylor Opposes Zcash-Style Bitcoin Privacy

2025/12/05 23:18

Key Highlights:

  • Michael Saylor has opposed Zcash style privacy on Bitcoin.
  • StarkNet aims to grow the Bitcoin economy through Layer 2 scaling.
  • The privacy debate centers on balancing anonymity with regulatory transparency.

Eli Ben-Sasson, the co-founder of the privacy coin Zcash and key developer behind StarkNet, said that Michael Saylor from MicroStrategy (now known as Strategy) is not in the favor of adding Zcash-style privacy features to Bitcoin through a social media post on X today, December 5, 2025.

According to Ben-Sasson, Saylor told him on their first meeting that Bitcoin should not include that kind of privacy, because if transactions become too hidden, governments might see it as a threat and try to shut Bitcoin down.

The tweet highlights a major debate within the Bitcoin community which questions if Bitcoin should become more private like Zcash, or should it stay transparent enough to keep regulators comfortable?

Supporters of privacy say anonymity protects financial freedom. Critics, on the other hand, worry that too much privacy could trigger government backlash and hurt Bitcoin’s global adoption.

The Privacy Debate: Security vs. Censorship Resistance

Michael Saylor’s concern is that if Bitcoin becomes completely private, like Zcash, where all transaction details are hidden, governments around the world might react badly. He worries that if authorities can not see what is happening on the network, they could accuse Bitcoin of enabling crime and then try to shut down miners, nodes, or even ban the network.

Eli Ben-Sasson and other privacy supporters disagree with Saylor’s thought process. They say that privacy is not a threat, it is actually a necessity. Without privacy, Bitcoin cannot fully protect financial freedom or prevent censorship. They also say that privacy is something that makes every coin equal (fungibility), so no one can block or reject coins based on their past history.

Ben-Sasson adds that privacy and regulation do not have to clash. Zcash already uses something called viewing keys, which let users share transaction details only with trusted parties, for example, an auditor or regulator, without exposing that information to the entire world.

This creates a possible middle ground, where users stay protected and transparency is also made available when it is required legally. It is important to note that it is essentially a model where Bitcoin could offer strong privacy without putting itself at risk of government backlash.

StarkNet: Growing the Bitcoin Economy Through Layer 2 Solutions

The discussion has also shifted to StarkNet’s wider goal of pushing the Bitcoin economy using Layer 2 tech. StarkNet, co-founded by Eli-Ben Sasson, is a zero-knowledge rollup built mainly on Ethereum but wants strong integration with Bitcoin.

The idea is that StarkNet could make Bitcoin more useful, allowing faster, cheaper transactions and smart contracts at scale. The staking and yield mechanism is built on StarkNet’s Layer 2 network and uses bridged or tokenized Bitcoin, not native BTC transaction fees.

STRK token holders and decentralized autonomous treasuries (DATs) can earn rewards through this Layer 2 ecosystem, but it does not redirect actual fees from the Bitcoin mainnet.

Ben-Sasson hoped Michael Saylor would see this as a powerful way to grow Bitcoin’s ecosystem, which may provide BTC holders new opportunities to earn and participate, and not just store value.

The conversation covered Bitcoin upgrades such as OP_CAT, which allows more advanced features. Saylor warned that big or fast changes could shake confidence while Ben-Sasson’s side argued its well-studied and delaying it could in fact slow down Bitcoin’s growth.

Ben-Sasson ended the tweet stating that the next discussion would be on quantum resilience.

Also Read: Bitcoin Bounces From $84K Low to $94K, ETF Inflows Fueling the Surge?

Source: https://www.cryptonewsz.com/saylor-opposes-zcash-style-bitcoin-privacy/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October

CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October

The post CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. CME Group is preparing to launch options on SOL and XRP futures next month, giving traders new ways to manage exposure to the two assets.  The contracts are set to go live on October 13, pending regulatory approval, and will come in both standard and micro sizes with expiries offered daily, monthly and quarterly. The new listings mark a major step for CME, which first brought bitcoin futures to market in 2017 and added ether contracts in 2021. Solana and XRP futures have quickly gained traction since their debut earlier this year. CME says more than 540,000 Solana contracts (worth about $22.3 billion), and 370,000 XRP contracts (worth $16.2 billion), have already been traded. Both products hit record trading activity and open interest in August. Market makers including Cumberland and FalconX plan to support the new contracts, arguing that institutional investors want hedging tools beyond bitcoin and ether. CME’s move also highlights the growing demand for regulated ways to access a broader set of digital assets. The launch, which still needs the green light from regulators, follows the end of XRP’s years-long legal fight with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. A federal court ruling in 2023 found that institutional sales of XRP violated securities laws, but programmatic exchange sales did not. The case officially closed in August 2025 after Ripple agreed to pay a $125 million fine, removing one of the biggest uncertainties hanging over the token. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication. Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/cme-group-solana-xrp-futures
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:55