A qualitative study of instructors shows that multiscale design analytics provide new pedagogical insights, aid exploration and interpretation of AI-generated measures, strengthen assessment and feedback, and support student self-reflection.A qualitative study of instructors shows that multiscale design analytics provide new pedagogical insights, aid exploration and interpretation of AI-generated measures, strengthen assessment and feedback, and support student self-reflection.

Visual Analytics Transform How Teachers Understand Structure in Student Designs

2025/12/09 17:00

Abstract and 1. Introduction

  1. Prior Work and 2.1 Educational Objectives of Learning Activities

    2.2 Multiscale Design

    2.3 Assessing Creative Visual Design

    2.4 Learning Analytics and Dashboards

  2. Research Artifact/Probe

    3.1 Multiscale Design Environment

    3.2 Integrating a Design Analytics Dashboard with the Multiscale Design Environment

  3. Methodology and Context

    4.1 Course Contexts

    4.2 Instructor interviews

  4. Findings

    5.1 Gaining Insights and Informing Pedagogical Action

    5.2 Support for Exploration, Understanding, and Validation of Analytics

    5.3 Using Analytics for Assessment and Feedback

    5.4 Analytics as a Potential Source of Self-Reflection for Students

  5. Discussion + Implications: Contextualizing: Analytics to Support Design Education

    6.1 Indexicality: Demonstrating Design Analytics by Linking to Instances

    6.2 Supporting Assessment and Feedback in Design Courses through Multiscale Design Analytics

    6.3 Limitations of Multiscale Design Analytics

  6. Conclusion and References

A. Interview Questions

\

5 FINDINGS

We present findings from our grounded theory qualitative analysis of instructor interviews, regarding their experiences with the research artifact / probe. We developed four categories through the analysis of interview data, which illustrate (1) analytics providing insights and informing pedagogical action, (2) support for exploration, understanding, and validation of analytics, (3) use of analytics for assessment and feedback, and (4) analytics supporting students’ self-reflection.

5.1 Gaining Insights and Informing Pedagogical Action

Instructors in our study reported that multiscale design analytics provide them with novel and useful insights. I6 compared the experience with learning management systems, such as Canvas and Blackboard. According to I6, the scale and cluster analytics offer unique insights, which they have not encountered on any other system. According to I1 and I5, the scale and cluster analytics help them understand students’ progress on their design projects. I2 finds the analytics particularly useful in understanding how students have developed and presented structure in their design.

\ I1: I think using the dashboard and using the analytics is really helpful for me to kind of get an understanding of what [students are] doing.

\ I2: I’ve been thinking like, you know, [scales and clusters] could be a very useful information for me, you know in terms of how students develop structure and present that structure at different levels.

\ We find initial evidence for the value of insights—provided by multiscale design analytics—as a basis for pedagogical intervention [50, 68]. I9 expressed that these analytics can help them find out whether students are able to effectively use the multiscale design environment, and take action, adjusting the curriculum, as needed.

\ I9: If there are multiple scales and clusters…they are at least using the environment efficiently. So if this number is extremely low for everybody…then maybe you need to [give] a tutorial on [the design environment].

5.2 Support for Exploration, Understanding, and Validation of Analytics

Aiding comprehensibility is an important challenge to address in developing user interfaces for AI-based technologies [67]. AI-based multiscale design analytics represent complex characteristics of students’ design work. Instructors found that our dashboard design helps them explore and understand multiscale design analytics. In particular, instructors expressed that the links on the dashboard, in conjunction with visual annotations about how the algorithm operated on design instances, help them explore and understand the relationships between analytics and the scales and clusters they represent. I1 and I5 further expressed desire to navigate to specific scales and clusters within a design.

\ I1: I’m really enjoying these links that I can kind of click on it…with the scales or clusters like they can take me to those. I was wondering…whether it would be possible to…maybe like pinpoint or just kind of go to the precise scale.

\ I9: I was able to infer…there is one zoom level that has a particular region…and then they have a different zoom level that focuses on a different region and so on.

\ Linking the analytics with design assemblages that they measure supported instructors in giving feedback to validate and refine what is measured. As instructors were able to inspect specific regions represented by analytics, they expressed where AI has a mismatch with their interpretation.

\ I3: “I’m not sure why [it shows here] two different ones…you’ve got a couple [extra] clusters.”

\ I1, I3, I4, and I9 derived assistance in understanding the analytics through our dashboard’s visual annotation of the designs, which concretely represent the analytics through an animation of scales and clusters. The animation—which presents clusters present at each scale one by one—helped instructors understand how design elements form spatial clusters across scales. As I1 expressed*, “I think I now have a better understanding of spatial clusters [with] the animation of colors changing”.*

\ \

:::info Authors:

(1) Ajit Jain, Texas A&M University, USA; Current affiliation: Audigent;

(2) Andruid Kerne, Texas A&M University, USA; Current affiliation: University of Illinois Chicago;

(3) Nic Lupfer, Texas A&M University, USA; Current affiliation: Mapware;

(4) Gabriel Britain, Texas A&M University, USA; Current affiliation: Microsoft;

(5) Aaron Perrine, Texas A&M University, USA;

(6) Yoonsuck Choe, Texas A&M University, USA;

(7) John Keyser, Texas A&M University, USA;

(8) Ruihong Huang, Texas A&M University, USA;

(9) Jinsil Seo, Texas A&M University, USA;

(10) Annie Sungkajun, Illinois State University, USA;

(11) Robert Lightfoot, Texas A&M University, USA;

(12) Timothy McGuire, Texas A&M University, USA.

:::


:::info This paper is available on arxiv under CC by 4.0 Deed (Attribution 4.0 International) license.

:::

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

CLARITY Act Gains Support as Bitcoin Policy Momentum Builds

CLARITY Act Gains Support as Bitcoin Policy Momentum Builds

The post CLARITY Act Gains Support as Bitcoin Policy Momentum Builds appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto regulation in the United States has gained momentum ahead of midterm elections in 2026. Satoshi Action Fund CEO has promised a massive Bitcoin announcement that may change crypto adoption optics. The Clarity Act has already received minimum required support from the Democratic Senators. Crypto regulation in the U.S. is picking up speed heading into the 2026 midterms. The Satoshi Action Fund, led by Dennis Porter, has ramped up lobbying efforts in Washington D.C., pushing lawmakers to prioritize the CLARITY Act. Porter also teased that a “massive” Bitcoin announcement is coming next week; one he claims could change the trajectory of Bitcoin adoption in the U.S.  Industry voices are urging traders to watch closely. Benjamin Aaron Semchee, chairman of Averliz, told followers that Porter’s call deserves attention, underscoring how policy shifts could hit markets fast. What Crypto Regulations Are Expected from Washington D.C? Building on the GENIUS Act The U.S. lawmakers came together from both major parties to pass the GENIUS Act, which focuses on stablecoins as a form of payment.  With the country’s labor data having revealed weakness, lawmakers are now more keen than ever to tap into the emerging technologies to create new and higher paying jobs. Bipartisan Push for the CLARITY Act Momentum is now behind the CLARITY Act, which aims to overhaul crypto market structure rules. On Friday, 12 Democratic Senators, led by Senator Ruben Gallego, reaffirmed their intent to work across the aisle. “We hope our Republican colleagues will agree to a bipartisan authorship process, as is the norm for legislation of this scale. Given our shared interest in moving forward quickly on this issue, we hope they will agree to reasonable requests to allow for true collaboration,” the Dem Senators noted. Related: Ray Dalio Warns of US ‘Economic Heart Attack’ From Debt, Sees…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 21:02
Wall Street Giant Bernstein Predicts Bitcoin Price To Hit $1 Million By 2033

Wall Street Giant Bernstein Predicts Bitcoin Price To Hit $1 Million By 2033

Wall Street research firm Bernstein has reiterated one of the boldest long-term calls in traditional finance, confirming a $1 million Bitcoin price target for 2033 while materially revising how and when it expects the market to get there. Bernstein Keeps $1 Million Price Target For Bitcoin The latest shift surfaced after Matthew Sigel, head of digital assets research at VanEck, shared an excerpt from a new Bernstein note on X. In it, the analysts write: “In view of recent market correction, we believe, the Bitcoin cycle has broken the 4-year pattern (cycle peaking every 4 years) and is now in an elongated bull-cycle with more sticky institutional buying offsetting any retail panic selling.” The analyst from Bernstein added: “Despite a ~30% Bitcoin correction, we have seen less than 5% outflows via ETFs. We are moving our 2026E Bitcoin price target to $150,000, with the cycle potentially peaking in 2027E at $200,000. Our long term 2033E Bitcoin price target remains ~$1,000,000.” Related Reading: Did 2025 Mark A Bear Market For Bitcoin? Predictions Point To A $150,000 Rally In 2026 This marks a clear evolution from Bernstein’s earlier cycle roadmap. In mid-2024, when the firm first laid out the $1 million-by-2033 thesis as part of its initiation on MicroStrategy, it projected a “cycle-high” of around $200,000 by 2025, up from an already-optimistic $150,000 target, explicitly driven by strong US spot ETF inflows and constrained supply. Subsequent commentary reiterated that path and framed Bitcoin firmly within the traditional four-year halving rhythm: ETF demand would supercharge, but not fundamentally alter, the classic post-halving boom-and-bust pattern. Reality forced an adjustment. Bitcoin did break to new highs on the back of ETF demand, validating Bernstein’s structural call that regulated spot products would be a decisive catalyst. However, price action has fallen short of the earlier timing: the market topped out in the mid-$120,000s rather than the $200,000 band originally envisaged for 2025, and a roughly 30% drawdown followed. Related Reading: Bitcoin To Hit $50 Million By 2041, Says EMJ Capital CEO What changed is not the end-state, but the path. Bernstein now argues that the four-year template has been superseded by a longer, ETF-anchored bull cycle. The critical datapoint underpinning this view is behavior in the recent correction: despite a near one-third price decline, spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen only about 5% net outflows, which the firm interprets as evidence of “sticky” institutional capital rather than the reflexive retail capitulation that defined previous tops. In the new framework, earlier targets are effectively rescheduled rather than abandoned. The mid-2020s six-figure region is shifted out by roughly one to two years, with $150,000 now penciled in for 2026 and a potential cycle peak near $200,000 in 2027, while the 2033 $1 million objective is left unchanged. In that sense, Bernstein’s track record is mixed but internally consistent. The firm has been directionally right on the drivers—ETF adoption, institutionalization, and supply absorption—but too aggressive on the speed at which those forces would translate into price. The latest note formalizes that recognition: same destination, slower ascent, and a Bitcoin market that Bernstein now sees as governed less by halvings and more by the behavior of large, ETF-mediated capital pools over the rest of the decade. At press time, BTC traded at $90,319. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/12/10 01:00