PG vs TMUS Stock Comparison: Price, Growth & Valuation (2026)
Use MEXC Stock Compare for a detailed PG vs TMUS analysis. Compare PG and TMUS across price performance, growth, valuation, profitability and risk, based on market data and the latest reported financials.
PG vs TMUS Stock Comparison Summary
PG reported year-over-year revenue growth of 3.3%, compared with 9.7% for TMUS. Their P/E ratios are 21.5x and 16.8x, dividend yields are 3.02% and 2.45%, and 30-day volatility levels are 13.9% and 29.5%, respectively. These metrics highlight key differences in growth, valuation, dividend income and market risk. Overall neither stock has a clear lead based on the selected metrics.
Risk Disclaimer: MEXC Stock Compare provides information and comparisons on actual U.S.-listed stocks for reference only. Data may be delayed or inaccurate, does not constitute investment advice, and past performance does not guarantee future results.
PG vs TMUS Stock Return Comparison (1W)
Compare the cumulative total returns of Procter & Gamble Company (PG) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) over the selected 1W period. Data as of 2026-09-25 12:00:00.
PG vs TMUS Key Equity Metrics Comparison Summary
Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a market capitalization of $338.29B and operates in the Consumer Staples sector, with its main business classified under Personal Care Products. Its latest quarterly revenue changed +3.3% year over year.
T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) has a market capitalization of $178.24B and operates in the Communication Services sector, with its main business classified under Wireless Telecommunication Services. Its latest quarterly revenue changed +9.7% year over year.
PG vs TMUS Key Stock Indicators
| Comparison Metric | PG | TMUS | Comparison results |
Stock Price & Returns Latest delayed stock price with 1-day, 1-month and year-to-date returns. | $145.651D: +0.1%1M: +1.8%1Y: -4.3% | $166.161D: +0.1%1M: -6.5%1Y: -30.2% | PGWin |
Market Capitalization Total market value of the company's outstanding shares. | $338.29B | $178.24B | PGWin |
Sector & Industry The company's market sector and primary industry classification. | Consumer Staples / Personal Care Products | Communication Services / Wireless Telecommunication Services | -- |
| Based on delayed market data, PG is trading at $145.65, compared with $166.16 for TMUS. Their market capitalizations are $338.29B and $178.24B, respectively. PG operates in the Consumer Staples sector, while TMUS belongs to Communication Services. | |||
| PG vs TMUS Growth & Profitability | |||
Revenue Growth (YoY) Year-over-year change in revenue. | +3.3% | +9.7% | TMUSWin |
EPS Growth (YoY) Year-over-year change in earnings per share. | +1.7% | -9.9% | PGWin |
ROIC Return generated from invested capital. | 19.9% | 10.0% | PGWin |
Gross Margin / Operating Margin Profitability before and after operating expenses. | 50.2% / 22.7% | 62.2% / 19.8% | TMUSWin |
| On growth, PG posted revenue growth of +3.3% and TTM EPS growth of +1.7%. TMUS, by comparison, posted revenue growth of +9.7% and TTM EPS growth of -9.9%.On profitability, PG recorded a gross margin of 50.2%, an operating margin of 22.7%, and ROIC of 19.9%. For TMUS, the corresponding figures were 62.2%, 19.8%, and 10.0%.Overall, the indicators do not show a clear overall leader between the two companies. | |||
| PG vs TMUS Valuation & Balance Sheet | |||
Free Cash Flow Yield Free cash flow as a percentage of market capitalization. | 4.5% | 10.4% | TMUSWin |
Net Debt / EBITDA Net debt relative to EBITDA; a negative value indicates net cash. | 1.1x | 2.6x | PGWin |
Dividend Yield / Payout Ratio Dividend returns relative to share price and the share of earnings paid as dividends. | 3.02% / 64.9% | 2.45% / 41.4% | PGWin |
| TMUS offers a higher free cash flow yield, indicating a less demanding valuation. PG has the stronger balance sheet, while PG provides the higher dividend yield. Overall, the two stocks differ mainly in valuation, financial strength and dividend income. | |||
| PG vs TMUS Returns & Risk | |||
Total Return (Dividend-Adjusted) Cumulative return over 1, 5 and 10 years, including dividends. | 1Y: -4.3%5Y: +2.8%10Y: +65.8% | 1Y: -30.2%5Y: +30.0%10Y: +254.1% | TMUSWin |
30-Day Realized Volatility Annualized volatility based on the past 30 days of daily returns. | 13.9% | 29.5% | PGWin |
Beta (5Y vs S&P 500) Sensitivity to market movements; above 1 indicates greater market volatility. | 0.29 | 0.40 | PGWin |
| TMUS has delivered stronger long-term returns, but TMUS also shows higher recent volatility and market sensitivity. | |||
PG vs TMUS Valuation & Dividend Metrics
Review PG compared with TMUS across valuation, cash flow and dividend metrics, including P/E, forward P/E, free cash flow yield and dividend yield. These figures are provided for reference only and do not represent a fair-value estimate, price target or investment recommendation.
| Metric | PG | TMUS | Comparison results |
|---|---|---|---|
Market Cap | $338.29B | $178.24B | PGWin |
P/E (TTM) | 21.5x | 16.8x | TMUSWin |
P/S | 3.9x | 1.9x | TMUSWin |
EV/EBITDA | 15.8x | 8.0x | TMUSWin |
Dividend Yield | 3.02% | 2.45% | PGWin |
PG vs TMUS Profitability Over Time
Compare PG and TMUS across gross margin and operating margin trends over time to understand how each company's profitability has changed. Based on reported financial data only; not a forecast or investment advice.
| TTM | 3Y Avg | 5Y Avg | 10Y Avg | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PG | 50.7% | 50.1% | 49.9% | 49.6% |
| TMUS | 62.9% | 62.7% | 59.4% | 58.4% |
Technical & Fundamental Stock Analysis
RSI (14, daily)
PG 48.52 • TMUS 37.83
Measures short-term price momentum and helps identify possible overbought or oversold conditions.
50/200-DMA Position
PG 50D Below / 200D Below • TMUS 50D Below / 200D Below
Shows whether the stock is trading above or below its medium- and long-term trend lines.
R&D % of Revenue
PG 0.0% • TMUS 0.0%
Shows how much of revenue is invested in research and development.
Share Count Trend (3Y)
PG Decreased • TMUS Decreased
Shows whether the company's share count has increased or decreased over the past three years.
Company Profiles
Procter & Gamble Company
Personal Care Products
Since its founding in 1837, Procter & Gamble has become one of the world's largest consumer product manufacturers, with annual sales of more than $87 billion. It operates with a lineup of leading brands, including more than 20 that generate annual global sales of more than $1 billion each, such as Tide laundry detergent, Charmin toilet paper, Pantene shampoo, and Pampers diapers. Sales outside the US represent just over half of the firm's consolidated total.
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Wireless Telecommunication Services
Deutsche Telekom merged its T-Mobile USA unit with prepaid specialist MetroPCS in 2013, and that firm merged with Sprint in 2020, creating the second-largest wireless carrier in the US. T-Mobile now serves about 86 million postpaid and 26 million prepaid phone customers, equal to around 30% of the US retail wireless market. The firm entered the fixed-wireless broadband market aggressively in 2021 and now serves 8 million residential and business customers with its wireless network. It also serves 1 million fiber broadband customers through joint ventures with fiber network owners. T-Mobile owns a stake in these firms, which provide wholesale access to their networks. In addition, T-Mobile provides wholesale services to wireless resellers.
Trade PG & TMUS Stock Futures on MEXC
Trade USDT-margined Stock Futures referencing PG and TMUS on MEXC, with 24/7 access and leverage of up to 10x. These products are derivatives, do not represent ownership of the underlying shares and involve a significant risk of loss.
Everything You Need to Know About PG vs TMUS Stocks
What is MEXC Stock Compare?
MEXC Stock Compare is a side-by-side US stock comparison tool. It helps users compare two companies across stock price performance, market cap, valuation, growth, profitability, balance-sheet strength, dividends and risk. The results are provided for research purposes only and do not constitute investment advice.
Which metrics should I use to evaluate a company's growth?
Start with revenue growth to see how quickly the business is expanding, then review EPS growth to determine whether that growth is translating into higher earnings per share. Gross margin, operating margin and ROIC help assess the quality of that growth by showing profitability and capital efficiency. A company with fast revenue growth but declining margins may be expanding without improving its earnings quality.
How do PG and TMUS compare in growth and profitability?
In the latest reported period, PG recorded revenue growth of +3.3% and TTM EPS growth of +1.7%, compared with +9.7% and -9.9% for TMUS. The indicators do not show a clear overall leader between the two companies. This comparison is based on reported financial metrics and does not predict future performance.
What is the difference between P/E (TTM) and Forward P/E?
P/E (TTM) compares the current share price with actual earnings reported over the past 12 months. Forward P/E uses estimated earnings for the next 12 months, so it reflects market expectations but depends on forecasts that may change. Both ratios should be considered alongside growth, profitability and industry peers.
How do the risk profiles of PG and TMUS compare?
PG has a 30-day realized volatility of 13.9% and a five-year Beta of 0.29, compared with 29.5% and 0.40 for TMUS. TMUS shows higher historical volatility and market sensitivity. These indicators describe historical price movements and market sensitivity, but they do not cover every source of investment risk.
What do dividend yield and payout ratio indicate?
Dividend yield shows the annual dividend relative to the current share price, while the payout ratio shows how much of a company's earnings is distributed as dividends. A higher yield may provide more income, but it can also rise because the share price has fallen. Dividend sustainability should therefore be considered together with earnings, cash flow and the payout ratio.
How should I compare a high-growth stock with a lower-valued stock?
A high-growth stock may trade at a higher valuation if investors expect its revenue and earnings to continue expanding. A lower-valued stock may offer a more conservative entry point, but the lower valuation could also reflect slower growth or higher business risk. Growth, valuation, profitability, cash flow and risk should therefore be considered together.
Which is the better stock, PG or TMUS?
There is no single answer for every investor. Growth-focused investors may place greater weight on revenue growth, EPS growth and ROIC, while income-focused investors may prioritize dividend yield and payout sustainability. Investors with lower risk tolerance may focus more on volatility, Beta and balance-sheet strength. MEXC Stock Compare presents the relevant metrics but does not provide a buy or sell recommendation.
Can I trade PG and TMUS as RealStocks on MEXC?
Eligible users can trade PG and TMUS as real US stocks through MEXC RealStocks if both stocks are currently supported. Users must first open and verify a RealStocks account with MEXC's partner licensed broker. RealStocks represents ownership of actual shares rather than tokenized stock exposure. Availability may vary by stock and region, so users should check the corresponding RealStocks trading page before placing an order.
Disclaimer
The stock prices, financial metrics, comparison results and related information displayed on this page are sourced from third-party providers and are provided for informational and educational purposes only. Data may be delayed, incomplete or inaccurate, and MEXC does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness or timeliness. The comparisons and automated summaries do not constitute financial, investment, legal or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security or financial product. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Users should independently verify the information and assess their own objectives, financial circumstances and risk tolerance before making any decision. Where MEXC stock futures or other derivative products are referenced, such products do not represent ownership of the underlying shares and may involve leverage and a substantial risk of loss. Product availability is subject to applicable laws and regional restrictions.