ShidenNetwork (SDN) Price Analysis and Future Projection 2025-2030

1. Introducing ShidenNetwork

ShidenNetwork (SDN) stands as Kusama's premier multi-chain decentralized application (dApp) platform, engineered to empower developers with scalable, interoperable infrastructure for building next-generation blockchain solutions. As a parachain on the Kusama network—the canary network for Polkadot—ShidenNetwork leverages the robust security and cross-chain capabilities of the Substrate framework, enabling seamless deployment of Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) and WebAssembly (WASM) smart contracts. This unique positioning allows ShidenNetwork to serve as a testing ground for innovative dApps before their migration to Polkadot, fostering a vibrant ecosystem of decentralized finance (DeFi), non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and other Web 3.0 applications. As of late 2025, SDN's market capitalization hovers around $13 million, with a circulating supply exceeding 63 million tokens out of a total supply of 82 million. The platform's native token, SDN, plays a crucial role in network governance, transaction fees, and staking rewards, underpinning the economic incentives that drive participation and development within the ShidenNetwork ecosystem. This article will provide a comprehensive price analysis and future projection for SDN, offering detailed forecasts for the period 2025-2030, while exploring the key drivers, risks, and strategic considerations for investors.

2. SDN Price Journey and Current Market Position

Since its launch in 2021, ShidenNetwork (SDN) has experienced significant price volatility, reflecting the broader trends and sentiment in the cryptocurrency market. Initially, SDN saw a surge in value as the project gained traction and attracted early adopters and developers. However, the subsequent years have been marked by a pronounced downtrend, with the token's price declining from its all-time highs. As of late 2025, SDN is trading at a fraction of its peak value, with a current price of approximately $0.0208. This decline is indicative of the broader bearish sentiment that has gripped the crypto market, driven by macroeconomic factors, regulatory uncertainties, and reduced institutional interest. The market capitalization of SDN stands at around $13 million, reflecting a relatively small but dedicated community of holders and developers. Sentiment analysis reveals extreme market fear, with many investors adopting a cautious or bearish stance. Despite these challenges, ShidenNetwork continues to attract attention for its technological innovations and potential for future growth, particularly as the ecosystem matures and new use cases emerge.

3. Token Distribution Analysis

The distribution of ShidenNetwork (SDN) tokens is a critical factor in assessing the health and stability of the ecosystem. SDN's total supply is capped at 82 million tokens, with over 63 million currently in circulation. The token distribution is relatively decentralized, with no single wallet or entity holding a disproportionately large share of the supply. This balanced distribution reduces the risk of market manipulation and enhances the overall resilience of the network. However, the limited institutional participation in the SDN ecosystem remains a concern, as it suggests that the project has yet to attract significant investment from large financial institutions or venture capital firms. This lack of institutional involvement could impact the liquidity and trading volume of SDN, making it more susceptible to price volatility and speculative trading. Nevertheless, the broad distribution among retail investors and the active developer community provide a solid foundation for future growth and adoption.

4. Critical Drivers for SDN's Price Development

Several key factors are likely to influence the price development of ShidenNetwork (SDN) over the coming years. Token supply dynamics play a crucial role, as the fixed total supply of 82 million tokens creates scarcity and potential for appreciation if demand increases. Institutional engagement is another important driver, as increased investment from large financial institutions could boost liquidity, trading volume, and market confidence. Broader economic factors, such as global economic conditions, regulatory developments, and technological advancements, also have a significant impact on the cryptocurrency market. Technological advancements within the ShidenNetwork ecosystem, including improvements in data center efficiency, wide-area network (WAN) connectivity, and the integration of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, are expected to enhance the platform's scalability and utility. Additionally, enhanced security protocols and the continuous evolution of smart contract capabilities will further solidify ShidenNetwork's position as a leading multi-chain dApp platform. These factors, combined with the growing interest in decentralized applications and the expanding Web 3.0 landscape, create a favorable environment for SDN's long-term price appreciation.

5. SDN Price Forecast 2025-2030

Looking ahead to the period 2025-2030, ShidenNetwork (SDN) is poised for both conservative and bullish growth scenarios. In a conservative scenario, SDN's price is expected to gradually recover from its current levels, driven by steady adoption, technological improvements, and increased market confidence. By 2027, SDN could reach a price of $0.030, supported by a growing ecosystem and expanding use cases. In a more optimistic, bullish scenario, SDN's price could see a more rapid increase, potentially reaching $0.04536 by late 2030. This bullish projection is based on the assumption of significant institutional investment, widespread adoption of decentralized applications, and the successful implementation of advanced technological features. The growth cycle is likely to be characterized by periodic surges and corrections, reflecting the cyclical nature of the cryptocurrency market. Key price milestones to watch include $0.025 in 2026, $0.035 in 2028, and $0.04536 in 2030. These projections highlight the potential for substantial returns for early investors, while also acknowledging the inherent risks and uncertainties associated with the crypto market.

6. Professional SDN Investment Approaches and Risk Control

Investing in ShidenNetwork (SDN) requires a strategic approach that balances long-term accumulation with active market participation. Long-term accumulation involves buying and holding SDN tokens over an extended period, benefiting from the potential for significant price appreciation as the ecosystem matures. Active market participation, on the other hand, involves taking advantage of short-term price movements and trading opportunities, which can be particularly rewarding in a volatile market. Robust risk management is essential, with portfolio diversification being a key strategy to mitigate the impact of price volatility. Investors should consider allocating a portion of their portfolio to SDN while maintaining exposure to other digital assets and traditional investments. Protective measures, such as setting stop-loss orders and regularly reviewing investment positions, can help minimize losses during market downturns. Secure asset storage practices, including the use of hardware wallets and multi-signature accounts, are also crucial for safeguarding SDN holdings. By combining these approaches, investors can navigate the complexities of the SDN market and maximize their potential returns.

7. SDN's Obstacles and Risk Landscape

Despite its promising prospects, ShidenNetwork (SDN) faces several obstacles and risks that investors should be aware of. Price volatility and liquidity challenges are significant concerns, as the relatively small market capitalization and limited institutional participation make SDN more susceptible to sudden price swings and low trading volumes. Uncertain regulatory developments, both at the national and international levels, pose additional risks, as changes in laws and regulations could impact the legality and operability of the platform. Technical vulnerabilities, such as smart contract security and network scaling limitations, are also potential threats. While ShidenNetwork has implemented robust security protocols and is continuously improving its infrastructure, the risk of bugs, exploits, and other technical issues cannot be entirely eliminated. Investors should carefully evaluate these risks and consider them when making investment decisions, ensuring they have a well-diversified portfolio and a clear understanding of the underlying technology and market dynamics.

8. Final Assessment and Strategic Recommendations

In conclusion, ShidenNetwork (SDN) represents a speculative investment opportunity with balanced risk-reward potential. The platform's unique position as Kusama's multi-chain dApp layer, coupled with its technological innovations and growing ecosystem, positions it for potential long-term growth. However, the current market conditions, characterized by price volatility and limited institutional participation, require a cautious and strategic approach. For different investor profiles, tailored allocation guidance is recommended. Conservative investors may opt for a smaller, long-term allocation to SDN, while more aggressive investors can consider a larger, actively managed position. Engaging with the SDN ecosystem through MEXC provides a secure and user-friendly platform for buying, selling, and holding SDN tokens. By staying informed about the latest developments and market trends, investors can make well-informed decisions and capitalize on the opportunities presented by ShidenNetwork.

9. Common Questions Answered

Investors often have questions about cryptocurrency price predictions and the realistic growth expectations for digital assets like ShidenNetwork (SDN). It is important to recognize that price predictions are inherently uncertain and subject to a wide range of factors, including market sentiment, technological advancements, and regulatory developments. While SDN has the potential to reach higher price levels, such as $0.04536 by late 2030, these projections should be viewed as optimistic scenarios rather than guarantees. Comparative price targets for other digital assets available on MEXC can provide context and help investors make informed decisions. Ultimately, the key to successful investing in SDN and other cryptocurrencies is to conduct thorough research, diversify one's portfolio, and stay updated on the latest market trends and news.

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart

Description:Crypto Pulse is powered by AI and public sources to bring you the hottest token trends instantly. For expert insights and in-depth analysis, visit MEXC Learn.

The articles shared on this page are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily represent the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for prompt removal.

MEXC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be interpreted as a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

Latest Updates on null

View More
US Treasury Doubles Down, Hits Crypto Exchange Garantex with Second Sanction

US Treasury Doubles Down, Hits Crypto Exchange Garantex with Second Sanction

The United States Treasury Department has escalated its crackdown on illicit crypto activity, redesignating the Russian-linked cryptocurrency exchange Garantex Europe OU and sanctioning its successor platform, Grinex. The move follows years of allegations that Garantex processed more than $100 million in transactions tied to ransomware groups, darknet markets, and other cybercriminal operations. OFAC Targets Garantex Leaders in Crackdown on Crypto Crime The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has sanctioned three senior executives of crypto exchange Garantex and six associated companies in Russia and Kyrgyzstan. The measures, announced Thursday under OFAC’s cyber authorities, cite the platform’s role in laundering digital assets for cybercriminals. Treasury officials said Garantex has continued to serve ransomware operators despite being sanctioned in April 2022 for operating in Russia’s financial services sector. “Exploiting cryptocurrency exchanges to launder money and facilitate ransomware attacks not only threatens our national security, but also tarnishes the reputations of legitimate virtual asset service providers,” said John K. Hurley, Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence. Authorities say the exchange handled transactions for groups behind the Conti, LockBit, and Black Basta ransomware strains, as well as sanctioned money launderer Ekaterina Zhdanova. The new action follows a March 6 coordinated operation involving the U.S. Secret Service and German and Finnish authorities, which seized Garantex’s web domain, froze $26 million in cryptocurrency, and disrupted its infrastructure. 🥶 Tether has frozen $27 million in USDT held in wallets on the Russia-based Garantex Exchange. #TetherFreezes #TetherUSDT https://t.co/EdaS60FDE3 — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) March 6, 2025 The U.S. Department of Justice has also unsealed indictments against executives Aleksandr Mira Serda and Aleksej Bešciokov, charging them with money laundering conspiracy, operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business, and violating U.S. sanctions. Bešciokov was arrested in Kerala, India , while on vacation with his family. Mira Serda, a Russian national and co-owner of Garantex, remains at large. 👮‍♂️ Garantex operator arrested in India on US money laundering charges. #Garantex #CryptoLaw https://t.co/UaTmqvUvt9 — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) March 12, 2025 Prosecutors allege Garantex moved wallets to evade detection and provided misleading data to conceal account ownership, even in cases where Russian law enforcement sought information. If convicted, both face up to 20 years in prison for money laundering, another 20 for sanctions violations, and five years for operating without a license. Additionally, the Department of State has announced two reward offers under the Transnational Organized Crime Rewards Program of up to $5 million for information leading to the arrest and/or conviction of Mira Serda and up to $1 million for other key leaders of Garantex. U.S. Treasury Says Garantex Shifted Funds to Grinex to Evade Sanctions Following the March seizures, U.S. Treasury officials say Garantex moved its customer funds to a newly created exchange, Grinex, in an effort to bypass sanctions. Promotional materials for Grinex openly stated it was formed in response to the freezes and restrictions. Since its launch, it has processed billions in cryptocurrency transactions. Investigators also uncovered that Garantex and Grinex used a ruble-backed digital token, A7A5 , to return funds to Russian customers whose assets were frozen. 📈 A7A5, a stablecoin pegged to the Russian ruble, has processed over $9.3 billion in transactions on Grinex, the successor to Garantex. #A7A5 #Russia https://t.co/svrr75EywL — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) June 26, 2025 The token was tied to Russian firm A7 and its subsidiaries, which U.S. officials say are controlled by sanctioned individuals, including Moldovan oligarch Ilan Shor and Russian bank Promsvyazbank. OFAC has now sanctioned Grinex, A7, its subsidiaries, and Old Vector for aiding Garantex’s sanctions evasion efforts. Treasury officials say Garantex’s leadership was key to enabling the exchange’s illicit operations. Co-founder Sergey Mendeleev, co-owner Mira Serda, and regional director Pavel Karavatsky allegedly procured infrastructure, registered trademarks, and engaged in business development to maintain the appearance of legitimacy. Two other companies, InDeFi Bank and Exved, were also sanctioned. Both are controlled by Mendeleev and are accused of helping facilitate cross-border crypto transactions that bypass U.S. restrictions. The new sanctions mean all property and interests in property of the named individuals and entities that fall under U.S. jurisdiction are blocked. U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in any transactions with them unless authorized. Financial institutions that continue to do business with the sanctioned parties risk enforcement actions. The Treasury stressed that sanctions are intended to change behavior, not simply punish. OFAC maintains a process for removal from its Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) List for those who demonstrate compliance with U.S. laws. Garantex Action Follows Takedowns of BidenCash, BlackSuit Ransomware The Garantex case comes amid a series of recent U.S. operations targeting cybercriminal infrastructure. On June 5, law enforcement seized crypto linked to BidenCash , a dark web marketplace accused of selling over 15 million stolen credit cards and personal data. BidenCash generated over $17 million in revenue from selling over 15 million stolen credit cards and personal data. #BIdenCash #CryptoSeizure #DarknetMarketplace https://t.co/WYZqZOAIgp — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) June 5, 2025 The international operation, involving U.S., Dutch, and other agencies, took down around 145 domains linked to the site. Officials also disrupted the BlackSuit ransomware group , seizing over $1 million in digital assets tied to the malware scheme. BlackSuit is accused of targeting critical infrastructure sectors in the U.S. and abroad. 🔒 The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) took down multiple servers and domains belonging to the BlackSuit Ransomware group. #DOJ #BlackSuit https://t.co/hreZp6OC5k — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) August 13, 2025 U.S. authorities have repeatedly highlighted the growing nexus between ransomware, illicit crypto use, and state-linked actors. The United Nations has estimated that North Korea’s Lazarus Group has stolen more than $3 billion in digital assets worldwide, with much of the money funding weapons programs.
2025/08/15
Law and Code: The Debate on Tornado Cash Privacy

Law and Code: The Debate on Tornado Cash Privacy

Author: Huang Wenjing, Compliance Consultant at Mankiw (Shenzhen) Law Firm; Xu Xiaohui, attorney at Mankiw LLP in Shanghai Tornado Cash: Privacy Defender or Money Laundering Tool? Tornado Cash, a decentralized currency mixing protocol running on the Ethereum blockchain, was once widely used for its strong privacy protection features, which also made it a thorn in the side of regulators. In August 2022, the U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) added Tornado Cash to its SDN List, accusing it of being used for money laundering, specifically by the North Korean hacker group Lazarus Group, to process over $1 billion in illicit funds. This move marked the first time the United States had sanctioned an on-chain project, and it shook the entire crypto industry. However, on March 21, 2025, things took a turn for the better. The U.S. Treasury Department abruptly withdrew its sanctions order, removing the blacklist label from Tornado Cash and all associated addresses. This decision wasn't entirely unexpected. As early as November 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit had already issued a cold response to the Treasury Department, finding that Tornado Cash's core smart contract did not meet the definition of "property" and that the sanctions were an unauthorized act. But the lifting of sanctions doesn't mean the developers are off the hook. Alexey Pertsev was sentenced to five years and four months in prison for money laundering by a Dutch court in May 2024, while Roman Storm, based in the United States, remains mired in legal turmoil. This lawsuit has sparked a debate: should open-source code authors be held liable for the misuse of their tools? The Solana Policy Institute provided $500,000 in funding for Storm and Pertsev's legal defense, emphasizing that "writing code is not a crime." Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin and others have also raised funds for their defense, demonstrating the crypto community's high level of interest in this case. Roman Storm: Charged with money laundering, jury remains undecided In August 2023, Roman Storm was indicted by US prosecutors on eight counts, including money laundering, sanctions violations, and operating an unregistered money transmission business. On July 14, 2025, Storm's trial began in Manhattan, New York. Although the jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict on the money laundering and sanctions violations charges, resulting in those charges being dismissed or pending, Storm was still convicted of conspiracy to operate an unregistered money transmission business and faces a maximum sentence of five years. This ruling sparked widespread debate. Some argued that Storm, as a technology developer, should enjoy the right to free speech and should not be held responsible for the misuse of the decentralized tool he created. Others argued that while Storm could not control every detail of the protocol's use, if he knew the tool was widely used for illegal activities and failed to control it, he should be held accountable for its misuse. Technology is not guilty: the boundary between law and morality The slogan "Technology is innocent" is quite popular in the open source community and among believers in decentralization. The logic behind it is simple: the tool itself is neutral, and the guilt lies with the people who use it. Many countries, particularly the United States, generally consider technology developers to be creators entitled to free speech, meaning the code they write shouldn't automatically be held liable for abuse. For example, under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, internet service providers are generally not liable for the actions of users on their platforms. While this provision primarily applies to internet platforms, it offers similar protections to developers of decentralized protocols, assuming they don't directly engage in illegal conduct. However, not all countries fully embrace this concept. For example, in the Netherlands, Tornado Cash developer Alexey Pertsev was sentenced for allegedly aiding money laundering. Dutch courts have held that open source software developers may bear some liability for the misuse of their tools. This reflects the varying perspectives and understandings of technological liability across different jurisdictions. Determination of money laundering crime In the United States, money laundering is typically prosecuted under the Money Laundering Control Act. Under the Act, money laundering involves the illegal transfer of funds through banks or other financial institutions to conceal, disguise, or legitimize illicit proceeds. The elements of money laundering primarily include the illicit origin of the funds and the various transactions conducted to conceal their source. "Knowing" Standard Most jurisdictions require "knowledge that the funds were proceeds of crime" as a subjective requirement for money laundering offenses, meaning the defendant must have known that the activities they participated in involved the transfer of illegal funds. If the defendant was completely unaware of the illicit source of the funds, they generally cannot be found guilty of money laundering intent, and the United States is no exception. However, in certain circumstances, even without clear evidence of "knowledge" that the funds were derived from illegal sources, they may still be held liable for money laundering if they can prove reasonable suspicion or willful disregard of the illicit source of the funds. For example, Section 1956 of the Money Laundering Control Act explicitly states that any person who "knows or has reasonable cause to know" that a financial transaction involves illegal funds may be considered to have participated in money laundering. This means that even if there is no direct evidence that the defendant "knew" that the source of the funds was illegal, as long as there are obvious suspicious circumstances or negligent behavior, the court can still find him or her suspected of money laundering. The "knowledge" problem of Tornado Cash developers In the Tornado Cash case, whether the developers met the "knowing" standard became a key question in determining whether they should be held accountable for money laundering. According to the US prosecutors' charges, Tornado Cash's developers were accused of "intentionally" creating a tool that allowed anonymous transfers, facilitating money laundering. However, the defense argued that as developers of a decentralized protocol, they had no control or knowledge of the specific ways it could be abused. In determining whether a developer meets the “knowing” requirement, the court may consider the following factors: 1. Purpose of the Technical Tool: As an open-source, decentralized protocol, Tornado Cash was theoretically designed to enhance user privacy, not specifically for money laundering. However, whether the court can determine that the developers should have foreseen the potential for illegal activities when designing the tool remains a controversial issue. 2. Public Information and Warnings: If the developer or the community is aware that the tool is frequently used for illegal transactions but still does not take any measures to stop or warn, the court may find that the developer has the subjective intent of "knowing" or willful neglect. 3. Developers’ Conduct and Responsibility: U.S. prosecutors may argue that if Tornado Cash developers had sufficient knowledge of the potential misuse of their tool or failed to implement necessary constraints or monitoring on the tool’s anonymity, they could be deemed to have “knowingly” used the tool for money laundering. These factors, from different perspectives, have ignited a discussion about the responsibilities of developers in designing decentralized financial instruments. While the technology itself isn't inherently criminal, defining developer liability for its misuse is a complex and multifaceted issue. As the case progresses, how the law balances innovation and compliance may influence the future direction of blockchain technology. Conclusion: Who will bear the cost of innovation? The Tornado Cash case transcends the fate of individual developers; it is defining the boundaries of the entire decentralized finance industry. If even the authors of open source code can be jailed for the illegal activities of their users, who will dare to innovate? Conversely, if anonymity tools are allowed to flourish unchecked, won't criminal activity become even more rampant? This case is likely to be a bellwether for the future—its outcome will not only determine Storm's fate but also set a standard for the entire crypto community's code of conduct. On the balance between privacy and compliance, how will technology, law, and society find a compromise? Perhaps the answer, like blockchain itself, still awaits consensus.
2025/09/12
Malaysia rolls out AI carbon plan; China sets AI care goal

Malaysia rolls out AI carbon plan; China sets AI care goal

The post Malaysia rolls out AI carbon plan; China sets AI care goal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Homepage > News > Business > Malaysia rolls out AI carbon plan; China sets AI care goal Malaysia’s efforts at digitalization have received a significant jolt following a high-profile partnership between two local entities to use emerging technologies to regulate carbon emissions. Malaysia’s Sastena Technology Sdn Bhd and the Forest Research Institute have teamed up on an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven carbon intelligence, a move they claimed represents a “strategic fusion” of AI and nationally verified forest science. The new partnership is poised to improve Malaysia’s carbon assessment, monitoring, and reporting in line with global best practices. Malaysia has already made significant efforts for climate mitigation, with its emerging EV sector turning to blockchain technology for improved service offering. “This collaboration enables Malaysia to lead with transparent, science-backed carbon intelligence powered by AI,” said Sastena Technology CEO Jazzri Jamaludin. Apart from its predictive capabilities, the system can optimize processes to minimize emissions in real-time. Furthermore, the ability to automate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) and regulatory reporting will improve transparency while reducing the chances of manual errors. FRIM CEO Faizal Ramli disclosed that the commercial firm will deploy its decades of forest research expertise to the partnership, supporting Malaysia’s ambitions to become the regional leader. A blazing run of fighting climate change Malaysia’s streak of combating climate change has seen it launch a research and development (R&D) center, leveraging emerging technologies to provide actionable solutions. Dubbed the Sarawak Climate Change Center, the research institute incorporates blockchain and AI, with authorities revealing plans for a new framework to support local companies in meeting ESG standards. Outside of Malaysia, India has signaled an intent to leverage AI to tackle climate change risks, racking up early successes. Despite demonstrating advanced proficiency in forecasting storms, AI chip manufacturing has come under fire for derailing climate…
2025/11/11
View More