Galaxy and BitGo face off in court over failed $1.2B merger as Novogratz disputes a $100M termination fee and SEC accounting rules at trial.Galaxy and BitGo face off in court over failed $1.2B merger as Novogratz disputes a $100M termination fee and SEC accounting rules at trial.

Galaxy and BitGo face off over failed $1.2B deal

2026/05/22 15:09
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

Galaxy Digital founder Mike Novogratz has appeared in court as the company fights BitGo’s $100 million claim tied to a failed $1.2 billion merger.

Summary
  • Mike Novogratz testified in Delaware court over Galaxy’s failed $1.2 billion BitGo acquisition.
  • BitGo is seeking a $100 million termination fee after Galaxy called off the merger in 2022.
  • The dispute centers on financial statements, SEC accounting rules, and whether Galaxy validly ended the deal.

Novogratz appeared in Delaware Chancery Court this week in the long-running dispute between Galaxy Digital and BitGo. BitGo is asking the court to make Galaxy pay at least $100 million after the crypto investment firm walked away from the acquisition.

The companies agreed to the deal in 2021, when crypto valuations were still high. Galaxy later ended the merger in August 2022, after the Terra collapse and a wider market downturn. Galaxy said BitGo failed to deliver required audited financial statements on time. BitGo said Galaxy wrongly abandoned the deal.

SEC accounting rules sit at center of case

According to Bloomberg’s report, Novogratz testified that he was “pushing to get this deal done,” but said the SEC made approval difficult under then-Chair Gary Gensler. He also said Galaxy itself was not the subject of a government probe.

The accounting issue traces back to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 121. The Delaware Supreme Court said SAB 121 became effective shortly before BitGo’s financial statement deadline and gave guidance for public companies that safeguard digital assets. 

The court also noted that if BitGo failed to submit compliant statements by July 31, 2022, Galaxy could terminate the agreement without paying the reverse fee.

BitGo says Galaxy damaged its reputation

BitGo CEO Mike Belshe testified that the failed deal hurt the company. He said “This was incredibly damaging,” according to the report, while arguing that BitGo had provided the needed information.

BitGo’s side says Galaxy’s public reason for ending the merger suggested that BitGo could not pass an audit. Galaxy disputes that view and says the contract allowed termination without the $100 million fee because the financial statements did not meet the required terms.

Court fight comes as both firms expand

The case returns at a busy time for both companies. BitGo became a public company in January and later reported $3.77 billion in first-quarter revenue, up 112.6% from a year earlier. However, its net loss widened to $60.7 million as Bitcoin treasury marks and IPO costs weighed on results.

Galaxy has also been expanding its regulated U.S. footprint. A recent market update said GalaxyOne Prime NY received both a BitLicense and Money Transmission License from New York regulators on May 18, allowing it to offer trading and custody services to institutions in the state.

The trial is expected to end this week. The judge will decide whether Galaxy must pay the $100 million fee or whether the company had the right to terminate the deal without payment.

SPACEX(PRE) Launchpad Is Live

SPACEX(PRE) Launchpad Is LiveSPACEX(PRE) Launchpad Is Live

Start with $100 to share 6,000 SPACEX(PRE)

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Tags:

No Chart Skills? Still Profit

No Chart Skills? Still ProfitNo Chart Skills? Still Profit

Copy top traders in 3s with auto trading!