The post As ‘Whitexicans’ Restaurant Opens, Locals Protest The Name. Is It Racist Or Satire? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The store front for Whitexicans in New York. Courtesy: Instagram Before most New Yorkers have even had a chance to sample the chips and salsa, a recently opened Mexican restaurant in Queens, New York — called Whitexicans — has ignited a debate about their name. What does the name mean? Who is it referencing? And is it clever satire or tone-deaf? Whitexicans is technically a portmanteau, or mash up of the words “white” and “Mexicans”. In hundreds of comments on Instagram and Reddit, some assumed it was a joke; others were offended. But the restaurant owners describe the name as satire, and it was intended to poke fun at racial, class and cultural superiority. The origin of “whitexican” In Mexico, the word whitexican emerged around 2008 on Twitter (sometimes written “whitexicanismo”), eventually becoming a term used on social media and by academics. It was used to describe white-skinned, upper-class Mexicans who enjoy privilege and often exhibit obliviousness to structural inequality. Holding layers of class, race, and colonial critique — not simply a cheeky descriptor as a restaurant term. In the era of heightened sensitivity around branding, race, and culture, a name like Whitexicans may land as either bold commentary or table-flipping provocation, depending on the interpreter. Chef Adrian Reyes cuts small slices of marinated thin fillets of pork already cooked from “the ball” or “the spinning top”, to make traditional “Tacos al Pastor” (shepherd- style tacos) at El Tizoncito restaurant in Mexico city on October 31, 2016. / AFP PHOTO / OMAR TORRES (Photo credit should read OMAR TORRES/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images Intent vs Optics The debate around the name illuminates a larger dynamic: who gets to use racial or ethnic signifiers in branding, and how do audiences interpret them? When a restaurant adopts a loaded… The post As ‘Whitexicans’ Restaurant Opens, Locals Protest The Name. Is It Racist Or Satire? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The store front for Whitexicans in New York. Courtesy: Instagram Before most New Yorkers have even had a chance to sample the chips and salsa, a recently opened Mexican restaurant in Queens, New York — called Whitexicans — has ignited a debate about their name. What does the name mean? Who is it referencing? And is it clever satire or tone-deaf? Whitexicans is technically a portmanteau, or mash up of the words “white” and “Mexicans”. In hundreds of comments on Instagram and Reddit, some assumed it was a joke; others were offended. But the restaurant owners describe the name as satire, and it was intended to poke fun at racial, class and cultural superiority. The origin of “whitexican” In Mexico, the word whitexican emerged around 2008 on Twitter (sometimes written “whitexicanismo”), eventually becoming a term used on social media and by academics. It was used to describe white-skinned, upper-class Mexicans who enjoy privilege and often exhibit obliviousness to structural inequality. Holding layers of class, race, and colonial critique — not simply a cheeky descriptor as a restaurant term. In the era of heightened sensitivity around branding, race, and culture, a name like Whitexicans may land as either bold commentary or table-flipping provocation, depending on the interpreter. Chef Adrian Reyes cuts small slices of marinated thin fillets of pork already cooked from “the ball” or “the spinning top”, to make traditional “Tacos al Pastor” (shepherd- style tacos) at El Tizoncito restaurant in Mexico city on October 31, 2016. / AFP PHOTO / OMAR TORRES (Photo credit should read OMAR TORRES/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images Intent vs Optics The debate around the name illuminates a larger dynamic: who gets to use racial or ethnic signifiers in branding, and how do audiences interpret them? When a restaurant adopts a loaded…

As ‘Whitexicans’ Restaurant Opens, Locals Protest The Name. Is It Racist Or Satire?

2025/10/21 12:37

The store front for Whitexicans in New York.

Courtesy: Instagram

Before most New Yorkers have even had a chance to sample the chips and salsa, a recently opened Mexican restaurant in Queens, New York — called Whitexicans — has ignited a debate about their name.

What does the name mean? Who is it referencing? And is it clever satire or tone-deaf?

Whitexicans is technically a portmanteau, or mash up of the words “white” and “Mexicans”. In hundreds of comments on Instagram and Reddit, some assumed it was a joke; others were offended. But the restaurant owners describe the name as satire, and it was intended to poke fun at racial, class and cultural superiority.

The origin of “whitexican”

In Mexico, the word whitexican emerged around 2008 on Twitter (sometimes written “whitexicanismo”), eventually becoming a term used on social media and by academics. It was used to describe white-skinned, upper-class Mexicans who enjoy privilege and often exhibit obliviousness to structural inequality. Holding layers of class, race, and colonial critique — not simply a cheeky descriptor as a restaurant term.

In the era of heightened sensitivity around branding, race, and culture, a name like Whitexicans may land as either bold commentary or table-flipping provocation, depending on the interpreter.

Chef Adrian Reyes cuts small slices of marinated thin fillets of pork already cooked from “the ball” or “the spinning top”, to make traditional “Tacos al Pastor” (shepherd- style tacos) at El Tizoncito restaurant in Mexico city on October 31, 2016. / AFP PHOTO / OMAR TORRES (Photo credit should read OMAR TORRES/AFP via Getty Images)

AFP via Getty Images

Intent vs Optics

The debate around the name illuminates a larger dynamic: who gets to use racial or ethnic signifiers in branding, and how do audiences interpret them? When a restaurant adopts a loaded term rooted in class and race critique, questions arise: Is it punching up or punching down? Is it quoting culture or commodifying it? While all press is great press, is this an exception?

The intent might be provocative satire—but the optics include a historically marginalized community, a loaded term of class and race critique, and a dining scene already peppered with cultural appropriation.

Whitexicans could indeed function as creative commentary: a bold name that invites conversation, reflection, and visibility. But for some locals and observers, it carries heavy baggage without precise anchoring.

For now, their tacos will be judged. The ceviche will be judged. And the name will be judged too – as optics have become the story.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/dougmelville/2025/10/21/as-whitexicans-restaurant-opens-locals-protest-the-name-is-it-racist-or-satire/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

US Prosecutors Seek 12-Year Prison for Do Kwon Over Terra Collapse

US Prosecutors Seek 12-Year Prison for Do Kwon Over Terra Collapse

        Highlights:  US prosecutors requested a 12-year prison sentence for Do Kwon after the Terra collapse. Terraform’s $40 billion downfall caused huge losses and sparked a long downturn in crypto markets.  Do Kwon will face sentencing on December 11 and must give up $19 million in earnings.   US prosecutors have asked a judge to give Do Kwon, Terraform Labs co-founder, a 12-year prison sentence for his role in the remarkable $40 billion collapse of the Terra and Luna tokens. The request also seeks to finalize taking away Kwon’s criminal earnings.  The court filing came in New York’s Southern District on Thursday. This is about four months after Kwon admitted guilt on two charges: wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud. Prosecutors said Kwon caused more losses than Samuel Bankman-Fried, Alexander Mashinsky, and Karl Sebastian Greenwood combined.  U.S. prosecutors have asked a New York federal judge to sentence Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon to 12 years in prison, calling his role in the 2022 TerraUSD collapse a “colossal” fraud that triggered broader crypto-market failures, including the downfall of FTX. Sentencing is… — Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) December 5, 2025  Terraform Collapse Shakes Crypto Market Authorities explained that Terraform’s collapse affected the entire crypto market. They said it helped trigger what is now called the ‘Crypto Winter.’ The filing stressed that Kwon’s conduct harmed many investors and the broader crypto world. On Thursday, prosecutors said Kwon must give up just over $19 million. They added that they will not ask for any additional restitution. They said: “The cost and time associated with calculating each investor-victim’s loss, determining whether the victim has already been compensated through the pending bankruptcy, and then paying out a percentage of the victim’s losses, will delay payment and diminish the amount of money ultimately paid to victims.” Authorities will sentence Do Kwon on December 11. They charged him in March 2023 with multiple crimes, including securities fraud, market manipulation, money laundering, and wire fraud. All connections are tied to his role at Terraform. After Terra fell in 2022, authorities lost track of Kwon until they arrested him in Montenegro on unrelated charges and sent him to the U.S. Do Kwon’s Legal Case and Sentencing In April last year, a jury ruled that both Terraform and Kwon committed civil fraud. They found the company and its co-founder misled investors about how the business operated and its finances. Jay Clayton, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, submitted the sentencing request in November.  TERRA STATEMENT: “We are very disappointed with the verdict, which we do not believe is supported by the evidence. We continue to maintain that the SEC does not have the legal authority to bring this case at all, and we are carefully weighing our options and next steps.” — Zack Guzmán  (@zGuz) April 5, 2024  The news of Kwon’s sentencing caused Terraform’s token, LUNA, to jump over 40% in one day, from $0.07 to $0.10. Still, this rise remains small compared to its all-time high of more than $19, which the ecosystem reached before collapsing in May 2022. In a November court filing, Do Kwon’s lawyers asked for a maximum five-year sentence. They argued for a shorter term partly because he could face up to 40 years in prison in South Korea, where prosecutors are also pursuing a case against him. The legal team added that even if Kwon serves time in the U.S., he would not be released freely. He would be moved from prison to an immigration detention center and then sent to Seoul to face pretrial detention for his South Korea charges.    eToro Platform    Best Crypto Exchange   Over 90 top cryptos to trade Regulated by top-tier entities User-friendly trading app 30+ million users    9.9   Visit eToro eToro is a multi-asset investment platform. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk. Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment, and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. 
Share
Coinstats2025/12/06 02:14
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26