The post The P2E Apocalypse Is Gaming’s Best News appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Opinion by: Tobin Kuo, founder and CEO of Seraph Play-to-earn (P2E) had a moment — “had” its moment — but that’s the problem. Its time has passed. The thrill was the payout, not the play, not the result, which looked less like a game and more like shift work with a user interface.  To be fair, the experiments weren’t worthless. They proved that wallets can be controllers, assets can be portable, and communities can co-own the worlds they love. But it shouldn’t — and can’t — be denied that subsidies bent every design choice toward leeching mechanics. Everything was extraction: recruit, inflate, cash out and repeat.  With the audience shrinking with the faucet drip rate, reasons to keep playing fall, and so, let us now let P2E die without soft parting words or a eulogy. The slowdown shouldn’t be feared or loathed; it’s just a natural process of exploration, and now, it should be considered a filter — one that forces teams to build games someone will play even if its native token goes to zero. Gaming finance (GameFi) needs to purge traditional thinking and mechanics, learn from the past and take three simple steps: grow the play element, shrink the earn and give the genre a chance to thrive. The painful truth P2E primed GameFi to chase the yield of tokens instead of the true purpose of play: fun. The end results are economies that crumble under design choices that extract enjoyment at every turn. It’s a painful reality where incentives are paid more than the gameplay ever delivered.  As retention collapsed, new money flows slowed, tokens spiraled, and projects folded under the weight. The numbers don’t lie. Funding for blockchain gaming dipped 93% year-over-year in Q2 this year, while daily unique active wallets fell by double digits. Related:… The post The P2E Apocalypse Is Gaming’s Best News appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Opinion by: Tobin Kuo, founder and CEO of Seraph Play-to-earn (P2E) had a moment — “had” its moment — but that’s the problem. Its time has passed. The thrill was the payout, not the play, not the result, which looked less like a game and more like shift work with a user interface.  To be fair, the experiments weren’t worthless. They proved that wallets can be controllers, assets can be portable, and communities can co-own the worlds they love. But it shouldn’t — and can’t — be denied that subsidies bent every design choice toward leeching mechanics. Everything was extraction: recruit, inflate, cash out and repeat.  With the audience shrinking with the faucet drip rate, reasons to keep playing fall, and so, let us now let P2E die without soft parting words or a eulogy. The slowdown shouldn’t be feared or loathed; it’s just a natural process of exploration, and now, it should be considered a filter — one that forces teams to build games someone will play even if its native token goes to zero. Gaming finance (GameFi) needs to purge traditional thinking and mechanics, learn from the past and take three simple steps: grow the play element, shrink the earn and give the genre a chance to thrive. The painful truth P2E primed GameFi to chase the yield of tokens instead of the true purpose of play: fun. The end results are economies that crumble under design choices that extract enjoyment at every turn. It’s a painful reality where incentives are paid more than the gameplay ever delivered.  As retention collapsed, new money flows slowed, tokens spiraled, and projects folded under the weight. The numbers don’t lie. Funding for blockchain gaming dipped 93% year-over-year in Q2 this year, while daily unique active wallets fell by double digits. Related:…

The P2E Apocalypse Is Gaming’s Best News

2025/10/22 15:36

Opinion by: Tobin Kuo, founder and CEO of Seraph

Play-to-earn (P2E) had a moment — “had” its moment — but that’s the problem. Its time has passed. The thrill was the payout, not the play, not the result, which looked less like a game and more like shift work with a user interface. 

To be fair, the experiments weren’t worthless. They proved that wallets can be controllers, assets can be portable, and communities can co-own the worlds they love. But it shouldn’t — and can’t — be denied that subsidies bent every design choice toward leeching mechanics. Everything was extraction: recruit, inflate, cash out and repeat. 

With the audience shrinking with the faucet drip rate, reasons to keep playing fall, and so, let us now let P2E die without soft parting words or a eulogy. The slowdown shouldn’t be feared or loathed; it’s just a natural process of exploration, and now, it should be considered a filter — one that forces teams to build games someone will play even if its native token goes to zero.

Gaming finance (GameFi) needs to purge traditional thinking and mechanics, learn from the past and take three simple steps: grow the play element, shrink the earn and give the genre a chance to thrive.

The painful truth

P2E primed GameFi to chase the yield of tokens instead of the true purpose of play: fun. The end results are economies that crumble under design choices that extract enjoyment at every turn. It’s a painful reality where incentives are paid more than the gameplay ever delivered. 

As retention collapsed, new money flows slowed, tokens spiraled, and projects folded under the weight. The numbers don’t lie. Funding for blockchain gaming dipped 93% year-over-year in Q2 this year, while daily unique active wallets fell by double digits.

Related: Burn the tokens, keep the loot: Play-to-own games come next

More than 300 Web3 games went inactive, exposing how shallow the engagement was when rewards no longer covered the grind. It was a painful and bitter pill to swallow, but it brought clarity.

Games that had nothing to offer beyond emissions are dead or dying, and now builders have been left with the rubble of P2E in which to rebuild from the ground up. It’s time to ship systems that actually entertain people.

Regulation cracks the door open further to amplify the reality check: a healthy step for the GameFi scene. As bright lines are drawn around the plague of money-first, fun-second game loops, the P2E games, simply functioning as extraction machines, get treated like gambling. 

Consider India’s legislation banning money-based online games, slapping “earn-first” mechanics with scrutiny they can’t hide from whenever they blur into consumer harm or wagering. It doesn’t spell the end of onchain gaming; it’s just forcing the games to be created fit for purpose (rather than turning into gambling engines to be milked dry).

Teams building P2E games now must address the T. Rex in the room: no more building to bleed dry, no more hype. No more extracting from the fun of games in exchange for inflationary tokens and feigned “play.” The time for actual play is now. Get building.

Ownership without extraction

The correction is already outlined in the Q2 data. Funding is drying up, and the retention gimmicks aren’t fooling anyone. Games built on spreadsheets and emissions schedules were never built with genuine long-term consideration.

The way forward is expression, not extraction. It’s about creating worlds where seasonal resets recycle value in fresh ways, where items feel genuinely earned through effort, skill and persistence rather than bought through shortcuts. 

A healthy system respects scarcity as a design principle — moments, achievements and artifacts matter precisely because they cannot be infinitely duplicated. The idea that players primarily want another income stream must be cast out. Games are not financial instruments first; they are spaces of creativity, competition and community.

It is time to sunset play-to-earn without regret and to recognize it as a detour rather than a destiny. The industry’s real momentum will come from returning to the values that have always sustained great games: joy, mastery and meaningful play.

The resolve to build the next great generation of games will not come from token mechanics or speculative loops, but from honoring the player-first spirit that has always driven this medium forward.

Opinion by: Tobin Kuo, founder and CEO of Seraph.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/p2e-gaming-apocalypse?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Coinbase Vs. State Regulators: Crypto Exchange Fights Legal Fragmentation

Coinbase Vs. State Regulators: Crypto Exchange Fights Legal Fragmentation

US-based crypto exchange Coinbase has made a significant appeal to the Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding a wave of lawsuits aimed at its operations. The company is urging federal action to address what it describes as an “increasingly fragmented and hostile” regulatory landscape for the crypto market. Coinbase Urges Federal Action  In a recent letter, Coinbase highlighted the steps taken by the current Administration to create a more equitable framework for digital asset regulation. This includes the introduction of stablecoin legislation and two pending bipartisan market-structure bills aimed at fostering uniformity in the oversight of cryptocurrencies.  Coinbase argues that these initiatives have begun to mitigate the adverse effects of the previous Administration’s enforcement-driven regulatory approach.  However, the company warns that certain states are perpetuating this problematic trend by adopting “expansive and flawed” interpretations of securities laws and implementing new licensing requirements that undermine the federal government’s pro-innovation stance. Related Reading: REX Shares Claims Its DOGE And XRP Spot ETFs Will Be Approved By US SEC Tomorrow They make an example with the Oregon Attorney General, who has filed a lawsuit against Coinbase, claiming that many digital assets traded on its platform qualify as alleged unregistered securities.  The letter affirms that the suit not only targets Coinbase but also encourages other states to address what the Attorney General perceives as a regulatory gap left by federal authorities.  Similarly, the New York Attorney General has initiated legal action to regulate transactions involving digital assets based on decentralized protocols as securities, further complicating the regulatory environment. Coinbase has faced cease-and-desist orders from four states, which demand the company halt its retail staking services. These orders are deemed by Coinbase as “legally unfounded and inconsistent.” Unified Framework For Digital Assets In light of these challenges, the letter to the DOJ calls for urgent federal intervention to establish broad preemption provisions. The crypto exchange argues that preemption has historically been an effective tool for addressing state interference in national markets, referencing past Congressional actions. Coinbase contends that the current patchwork of state regulations not only disrupts market efficiency but also leads to unequal access to cryptocurrency services based on geographic location. Related Reading: Citi’s Ethereum Forecast: No New All-Time High Expected, Year-End Target At $4,300 To remedy these issues, Coinbase advocates for Congress to adopt legislation that would exempt federally regulated digital assets from state blue-sky laws and clarify that state licensing requirements do not apply to crypto intermediaries.  Additionally, the company urges the SEC to expedite rulemaking and provide clearer guidance on why digital asset transactions and services, including staking, should not be classified as securities. Such clarity would help prevent states from imposing conflicting regulations based on their interpretations of securities laws. Featured image from Shutterstock, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 15:00
Maryland Man Sentenced for Allegedly Aiding North Korea’s US Company Infiltration and Sensitive Data Access

Maryland Man Sentenced for Allegedly Aiding North Korea’s US Company Infiltration and Sensitive Data Access

The post Maryland Man Sentenced for Allegedly Aiding North Korea’s US Company Infiltration and Sensitive Data Access appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. North Korea’s IT workers infiltrated US companies through a Maryland man’s scheme, earning over $970,000 while enabling access to sensitive government systems. This operation supported the regime’s cyber activities, including crypto hacks that stole $2 billion in 2025, funding nuclear programs. Minh Phuong Ngoc Vong sentenced to 15 months in prison for aiding North Korean infiltration. He used fake credentials to secure jobs at 13 US firms, passing work to overseas conspirators. North Korea stole $2 billion in crypto in 2025 via hacks, totaling over $6 billion recently, per blockchain analytics firm Elliptic. Discover how North Korea’s IT infiltration and crypto hacking schemes threaten US security. Learn the details of the Maryland case and regime’s $6B theft. Stay informed on cybersecurity risks today. What is North Korea’s IT Infiltration Scheme in US Companies? North Korea’s IT infiltration scheme involves covertly placing regime-affiliated workers into US companies using fake identities to generate revenue and access sensitive systems. In a recent Maryland case, Minh Phuong Ngoc Vong was sentenced to 15 months in prison and three years of supervised release for facilitating this for three years across 13 companies. The operation netted over $970,000, much of which funded North Korea’s weapons programs through software work performed by overseas actors, including those in China near the border. How Does North Korea Use Crypto Hacking to Fund Its Programs? North Korea employs sophisticated cyber groups to target cryptocurrency exchanges and wallets, stealing digital assets that convert to fiat for regime funding. According to blockchain analytics firm Elliptic, these groups pilfered approximately $2 billion in cryptocurrencies in 2025 alone, contributing to a total exceeding $6 billion in recent years from hacks on platforms like Bybit and Upbit. This influx directly supports nuclear and missile development, as confirmed by US intelligence assessments. Experts note the regime’s…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/06 09:12