The post Mamadou Kwidjim Toure, Founder and CEO at Ubuntu Tribe appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Questions: The visionary man, Mamadou Kwidjim Toure, has led an initiative, Africa 2.0, to transform and empower the country by uniting a diverse group of young emerging leaders from all across Africa. Toure, who has been featured as one of the top 10 most powerful men of Africa by Forbes, has shared deep insights into his journey with CoinEdition in an interview. 1. You’ve had a long 20 years of career in the finance sector, and currently you are heading the Ubuntu Group as CEO.  Can you tell us the moment or realization that made you pivot into blockchain and token-based models? I didn’t wake up one morning and decide to “do crypto.” My journey started in development finance, working with institutions like the IFC and the World Bank ecosystem, where I kept seeing the same paradox: Africa is one of the richest regions in natural and human resources, yet its people are among the poorest. There was clearly a structural problem in how value is created, stored, and distributed. The real inflection point came around 2015–2016, when I began to deeply study blockchain. For the first time, I saw a technology that could hard-code transparency, fractional ownership, and borderless access into the financial system itself. Later, when we launched Ubuntu Tribe, the insight was simple: if you can tokenize gold down to 1 milligram and make it accessible from a basic smartphone, you are rewriting who gets to participate in the global store of value. So it wasn’t a pivot away from finance; it was a continuation of the same mission with better tools. Blockchain and tokenization are, for me, the missing rails to deliver what development finance has promised for decades: shared prosperity, not just for institutions and elites, but for everyday people. 2. Why do you think… The post Mamadou Kwidjim Toure, Founder and CEO at Ubuntu Tribe appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Questions: The visionary man, Mamadou Kwidjim Toure, has led an initiative, Africa 2.0, to transform and empower the country by uniting a diverse group of young emerging leaders from all across Africa. Toure, who has been featured as one of the top 10 most powerful men of Africa by Forbes, has shared deep insights into his journey with CoinEdition in an interview. 1. You’ve had a long 20 years of career in the finance sector, and currently you are heading the Ubuntu Group as CEO.  Can you tell us the moment or realization that made you pivot into blockchain and token-based models? I didn’t wake up one morning and decide to “do crypto.” My journey started in development finance, working with institutions like the IFC and the World Bank ecosystem, where I kept seeing the same paradox: Africa is one of the richest regions in natural and human resources, yet its people are among the poorest. There was clearly a structural problem in how value is created, stored, and distributed. The real inflection point came around 2015–2016, when I began to deeply study blockchain. For the first time, I saw a technology that could hard-code transparency, fractional ownership, and borderless access into the financial system itself. Later, when we launched Ubuntu Tribe, the insight was simple: if you can tokenize gold down to 1 milligram and make it accessible from a basic smartphone, you are rewriting who gets to participate in the global store of value. So it wasn’t a pivot away from finance; it was a continuation of the same mission with better tools. Blockchain and tokenization are, for me, the missing rails to deliver what development finance has promised for decades: shared prosperity, not just for institutions and elites, but for everyday people. 2. Why do you think…

Mamadou Kwidjim Toure, Founder and CEO at Ubuntu Tribe

2025/11/20 20:01

Questions:

The visionary man, Mamadou Kwidjim Toure, has led an initiative, Africa 2.0, to transform and empower the country by uniting a diverse group of young emerging leaders from all across Africa. Toure, who has been featured as one of the top 10 most powerful men of Africa by Forbes, has shared deep insights into his journey with CoinEdition in an interview.

1. You’ve had a long 20 years of career in the finance sector, and currently you are heading the Ubuntu Group as CEO.  Can you tell us the moment or realization that made you pivot into blockchain and token-based models?

I didn’t wake up one morning and decide to “do crypto.” My journey started in development finance, working with institutions like the IFC and the World Bank ecosystem, where I kept seeing the same paradox: Africa is one of the richest regions in natural and human resources, yet its people are among the poorest. There was clearly a structural problem in how value is created, stored, and distributed.

The real inflection point came around 2015–2016, when I began to deeply study blockchain. For the first time, I saw a technology that could hard-code transparency, fractional ownership, and borderless access into the financial system itself. Later, when we launched Ubuntu Tribe, the insight was simple: if you can tokenize gold down to 1 milligram and make it accessible from a basic smartphone, you are rewriting who gets to participate in the global store of value.

So it wasn’t a pivot away from finance; it was a continuation of the same mission with better tools. Blockchain and tokenization are, for me, the missing rails to deliver what development finance has promised for decades: shared prosperity, not just for institutions and elites, but for everyday people.

2. Why do you think blockchain and AI are essential for the economic empowerment of Africa?

Africa is young, mobile-first, and still largely excluded from traditional financial and data infrastructure. That combination is both a risk and a huge opportunity. Blockchain gives us a way to build trust where institutions are weak, and AI gives us a way to turn data and creativity into economic value at scale. Together, they compress the time it takes for a young African to go from “idea” to “global participant.”

On the blockchain side, tokenization allows us to connect our real assets—gold, commodities, infrastructure, even carbon and culture—to global capital markets in a transparent way. Instead of value being extracted and booked elsewhere, it can be shared more fairly, and people can hold digital claims to real assets from as little as a few cents. That is extremely powerful for savings, remittances, and resilience in volatile economies.

AI then sits on top as a multiplier and an equalizer. It can help farmers get better prices and forecasts, SMEs access credit scoring based on real behavior rather than lack of paperwork, and young developers build applications in weeks that used to take years for large teams. If we combine blockchain’s trust layer with AI’s intelligence layer, we can design systems where Africans are not just users, but co-owners and co-creators of the value they generate.

3. What are the problems the $GIFT gold fungible token is solving in terms of financial and social mobility?

Gold has always been a store of value, but for most people—especially in emerging markets—it’s been difficult to access in a safe, liquid, and affordable way. With $GIFT Gold, we took a very simple idea: make gold ownable by the milligram on-chain, 100% backed by audited, insured physical gold in secure vaults, and regulated under European law. That means someone can start saving in gold from around ten cents, directly from their phone.

The first problem we solve is accessible savings in a hard asset. In many African and emerging economies, people save in cash or unstable local currencies. By allowing micro-savings in tokenized gold, $GIFT helps protect purchasing power and offers a gateway to long-term wealth preservation. The second problem is mobility: because $GIFT is on-chain, you can send value across borders in minutes, not days, often at a fraction of the cost of traditional remittances.

There is also a social mobility dimension. When communities have an easy, trusted way to accumulate assets, they can start thinking beyond survival—investing in education, entrepreneurship, and local projects. In the long run, we see $GIFT as part of a broader ecosystem where tokenized real-world assets become collateral for credit, participation in DeFi, and collective investment vehicles that were previously reserved for the few.

4. In the African context, what are the biggest challenges that you’re facing right now in implementing blockchain-based asset models, and how are you navigating them?

The first big challenge is regulatory clarity. Many African regulators are still in the exploratory phase around digital assets. They are rightly concerned about consumer protection, capital flight, and systemic risk. At the same time, the absence of clear frameworks can slow down innovation and scare away serious players. Our approach has been to build under strong jurisdictions—like Europe’s MiCA framework for $GIFT—while engaging African policymakers through dialogue, education, and pilot projects rather than confrontation.

The second challenge is education and trust. For a farmer, trader, or teacher, “tokenized gold on a blockchain” is abstract. People need to see, touch, and understand the benefits. That’s why we invest heavily in partnerships with local fintechs, mobile money operators, and community organizations, so that digital gold becomes as intuitive as topping up airtime. We also emphasize that each token is backed by real gold in real vaults—this is not speculation, it’s asset ownership.

Finally, there’s infrastructure: connectivity, identity, and on/off-ramps. You can’t scale tokenized assets without reliable ways to move between cash, mobile money, crypto, and back. We’re solving this step by step by integrating with existing rails—cards, wallets, exchanges—and by designing our products to work on low-bandwidth devices. It’s slower than building for a fully banked market, but it’s also where the deepest impact lies.

5. How are Africa 2.0 initiatives supporting technological innovation and economic stability in society? What I ask here is the impact that is being created through this initiative

When we launched Africa 2.0 back in 2010, the idea was to create a “D-ink tank”—a think tank that does things—bringing together emerging African leaders with a shared vision for the continent. We developed a Manifesto for Africa, not just as a document, but as a roadmap to mobilize talent, capital, and policy toward shared prosperity.

In practice, Africa 2.0 has been a platform to prototype solutions: from entrepreneurship and youth employment programs to policy recommendations on governance, infrastructure, and digital transformation. It has helped incubate projects, convene stakeholders, and create a new narrative: that Africans are not victims of history, but co-authors of their future. Many of the leaders involved have gone on to launch companies, funds, and initiatives that are now shaping the tech and innovation landscape.

For me personally, Africa 2.0 was the “leadership school” that led to the Ubuntu Group and the Ubuntu Tribe. The work we do today in tokenization and inclusive finance is a direct continuation of that original mission: using cutting-edge tools to solve age-old problems. So the impact of Africa 2.0 is both tangible—in programs, policies, networks—and symbolic: it has helped shift the mindset from aid-dependency to co-creation and ownership.

6. Before exploring the blockchain, you have spent over a decade of experience in development finance. So, can you please take us through the advantages that blockchain brings that the traditional financial system lacks?

Traditional finance has done important things: it financed infrastructure, supported trade, and helped many countries grow. But it was never designed for inclusivity at the edge. It is expensive to serve low-income customers, slow to adapt, and highly centralized. In my years in development finance, I saw how capital often stopped at the level of governments and large corporates, with very little trickling down to the micro-entrepreneur, the farmer, or the informal worker.

Blockchain changes the physics of how value moves. First, it enables programmable trust: rules can be encoded into smart contracts, reducing the need for expensive intermediaries. This lowers transaction costs and allows us to economically serve a person who wants to save or send just a few dollars. Second, it introduces radical transparency: every transaction can be auditable, which is crucial in environments where corruption and leakages have historically undermined development efforts.

Third, blockchain enables fractional and borderless ownership. You can now hold a fraction of a building, a kilogram of cocoa, or a milligram of gold, and trade or collateralize it from your phone. That is something traditional finance has struggled to offer at scale without complex and costly structures. Importantly, I don’t see blockchain as replacing the old system overnight. I see it as a new layer that, if built responsibly, can extend the reach of finance to billions of people who have talent and ambition, but lack access to fair tools.

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/mamadou-kwidjim-toure-founder-and-ceo-at-ubuntu-group/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Adoption of Web3 in Europe: Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

The Adoption of Web3 in Europe: Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

How decentralization technologies are advancing in the Old Continent.
Share
The Cryptonomist2025/12/06 15:00
Wang Yongli, former vice president of the Bank of China: Why did China resolutely halt stablecoins?

Wang Yongli, former vice president of the Bank of China: Why did China resolutely halt stablecoins?

Written by: Wang Yongli , former Vice President of Bank of China China's policy orientation of accelerating the development of the digital yuan and resolutely curbing virtual currencies, including stablecoins, is now fully clear. This is based on a comprehensive consideration of factors such as China's leading global advantages in mobile payments and the digital yuan, the sovereignty and security of the yuan, and the stability of the monetary and financial system. Since May 2025, the United States and Hong Kong have been racing to advance stablecoin legislation, which has led to a surge in global legislation on stablecoins and crypto assets (also known as "cryptocurrencies" or "virtual currencies"). A large number of institutions and capital are flocking to issue stablecoins and invest in crypto assets, which has also sparked heated debate on whether China should fully promote stablecoin legislation and the development of RMB stablecoins (including offshore ones). Furthermore, after the United States legislated to prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing digital dollars, whether China should continue to promote digital RMB has also become a hot topic of debate. For China, this involves the direction and path of national currency development. With the global spread of stablecoins and the increasingly acute and complex international relations and fiercer international currency competition, this has a huge and far-reaching impact on how the RMB innovates and develops, safeguards national security, and achieves the strategic goals of a strong currency and a financial power. We must calmly analyze, accurately grasp, and make decisions early. We cannot be indifferent or hesitant, nor can we blindly follow the trend and make directional and subversive mistakes. Subsequently, the People's Bank of China announced that it would optimize the positioning of the digital yuan within the monetary hierarchy (adjusting the previously determined M0 positioning. This is a point I have repeatedly advocated from the beginning; see Wang Yongli's WeChat public account article "Digital Yuan Should Not Be Positioned as M0" dated January 6, 2021), further optimize the digital yuan management system (establishing an international digital yuan operations center in Shanghai, responsible for cross-border cooperation and use of the digital yuan; and establishing a digital yuan operations management center in Beijing, responsible for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the digital yuan system), and promote and accelerate the development of the digital yuan . On November 28, the People's Bank of China and 13 other departments jointly convened a meeting of the coordination mechanism for combating virtual currency trading and speculation. The meeting pointed out that due to various factors, virtual currency speculation has recently resurfaced, and related illegal and criminal activities have occurred frequently, posing new challenges to risk prevention and control. It emphasized that all units should deepen coordination and cooperation, continue to adhere to the prohibitive policy on virtual currencies, and persistently crack down on illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies. It clarified that stablecoins are a form of virtual currency , and their issuance and trading activities are also illegal and subject to crackdown. This has greatly disappointed those who believed that China would promote the development of RMB stablecoins and correspondingly relax the ban on virtual currency (crypto asset) trading. Therefore, China's policy orientation of accelerating the development of the digital yuan and resolutely curbing virtual currencies, including stablecoins, is now fully clear . Of course, this policy orientation remains highly debated both domestically and internationally, and there is no consensus among the public. So, how should we view this major policy direction of China? This article will first answer why China resolutely halted stablecoins; how to accelerate the innovative development of the digital yuan will be discussed in another article . There is little room or opportunity for the development of non-USD stablecoins. Since Tether launched USDT, a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, in 2014 , USD stablecoins have been operating for over a decade and have formed a complete international operating system. They have basically dominated the entire crypto asset trading market, accounting for over 99% of the global fiat stablecoin market capitalization and trading volume . This situation arises from two main factors. First, the US dollar is the most liquid and has the most comprehensive supporting system of international central currencies, making stablecoins pegged to the dollar the easiest to accept globally. Second, it is also a result of the US's long-standing tolerant policy towards crypto assets like Bitcoin and dollar-denominated stablecoins, rather than leading the international community to strengthen necessary regulation and safeguard the fundamental interests of all humanity. Even this year, when the US pushed for legislation on stablecoins and crypto assets, it was largely driven by the belief that dollar-denominated stablecoins would increase global demand for the dollar and dollar-denominated assets such as US Treasury bonds, reduce the financing costs for the US government and society, and strengthen the dollar's international dominance. This was a choice made to enhance US support for dollar-denominated stablecoins and control their potential impact on the US, prioritizing the maximization of national interests while giving little consideration to mitigating the international risks of stablecoins. With the US strongly promoting dollar-denominated stablecoins, other countries or regions launching non-dollar fiat currency stablecoins will find it difficult to compete with dollar-denominated stablecoins on an international level, except perhaps within their own sovereign territory or on the issuing institution's own e-commerce platform. Their development potential and practical significance are limited . Lacking a strong ecosystem and application scenarios, and lacking distinct characteristics compared to dollar-denominated stablecoins, as well as the advantage of attracting traders and transaction volume, the return on investment for issuing non-dollar fiat currency stablecoins is unlikely to meet expectations, and they will struggle to survive in an environment of increasingly stringent legislation and regulation in various countries. The legislation on stablecoins in the United States still faces many problems and challenges. Following President Trump's second election victory, his strong advocacy for crypto assets such as Bitcoin fueled a new international frenzy in cryptocurrency trading, driving the rapid development of dollar-denominated stablecoin trading and a surge in stablecoin market capitalization. This not only increased demand for the US dollar and US Treasury bonds, strengthening the dollar's international status, but also brought huge profits to the Trump family and their cryptocurrency associates. However, this also posed new challenges to the global monitoring of the dollar's circulation and the stability of the traditional US financial system. Furthermore, the trading and transfer of crypto assets backed by dollar-denominated stablecoins has become a new and more difficult-to-prevent tool for the US to harvest global wealth, posing a serious threat to the monetary sovereignty and wealth security of other countries . This is why the United States has accelerated legislation on stablecoins, but its legislation is more about prioritizing America and maximizing American and even group interests, at the expense of the interests of other countries and the common interests of the world. After the legislation on US dollar stablecoins came into effect, institutions that have not obtained approval and operating licenses from US regulators will find it difficult to issue and operate US dollar stablecoins in the United States (for this reason, Tether has announced that it will apply for US-issued USDT). Stablecoin issuers subject to US regulation must meet regulatory requirements such as Know Your Customer (KYC), Anti-Money Laundering (AML), and Counter-Terrorist Financing (FTC). They must be able to screen customers against government watchlists and report suspicious activities to regulators. Their systems must have the ability to freeze or intercept specific stablecoins when ordered by law enforcement agencies. Stablecoin issuers must have reserves of no less than 100% US dollar assets (including currency assets, short-term Treasury bonds, and repurchase agreements backed by Treasury bonds) approved by regulators, and must keep US customer funds in US banks and not transfer them overseas. They are prohibited from paying interest or returns on stablecoins, and strict control must be exercised over-issuance and self-operation. Reserve assets must be held in custody by an independent institution approved by regulators and must be audited by an auditing firm at least monthly and an audit report must be issued. This will greatly enhance the value stability of stablecoins relative to the US dollar, strengthen their payment function and compliance, while weakening their investment attributes and illegal use; it will also significantly increase the regulatory costs of stablecoins, thereby reducing their potential for exorbitant profits in an unregulated environment. The US stablecoin legislation officially took effect on July 18, but it still faces numerous challenges : While it stipulates the scope of reserve assets for stablecoin issuance (bank deposits, short-term Treasury bonds, repurchase agreements backed by Treasury bonds, etc.), since it primarily includes Treasury bonds with fluctuating trading prices, even if reserve assets are sufficient at the time of issuance, a subsequent decline in Treasury bond prices could lead to insufficient reserves; if the reserve asset structures of different issuing institutions are not entirely consistent, and there is no central bank guarantee, it means that the issued dollar stablecoins will not be the same, creating arbitrage opportunities and posing challenges to relevant regulation and market stability; even if there is no over-issuance of stablecoins at the time of issuance, allowing decentralized finance (DeFi) to engage in stablecoin lending could still lead to stablecoin derivation and over-issuance, unless it is entirely a matchmaking between lenders and borrowers rather than proprietary trading; getting stablecoin issuers outside of financial institutions to meet regulatory requirements is not easy, and regulation also presents significant challenges. More importantly, the earliest and most fundamental requirement for stablecoins is the borderless, decentralized, 24/7 pricing and settlement of crypto assets on the blockchain. It is precisely because crypto assets like Bitcoin cannot fulfill the fundamental requirement of currency as a measure of value and a value token—that the total amount of currency must change in line with the total value of tradable wealth requiring monetary pricing and settlement—that their price relative to fiat currency fluctuates wildly (therefore, using crypto assets like Bitcoin as collateral or strategic reserves carries significant risks), making it difficult to become a true circulating currency. This has led to the development of fiat stablecoins pegged to fiat currencies. (Therefore, Bitcoin and similar crypto assets can only be considered crypto assets; calling them "cryptocurrency" or "virtual currency" is inaccurate; translating the English word "Token" as "币" or "币" is also inappropriate; it should be directly transliterated as "通证" and clearly defined as an asset, not currency.) The emergence and development of fiat-backed stablecoins have brought fiat currencies and more real-world assets (RWAs) onto the blockchain, strongly supporting on-chain cryptocurrency trading and development. They serve as a channel connecting the on-chain cryptocurrency world with the off-chain real-world, thereby strengthening the integration and influence of the cryptocurrency world on the real world. This will significantly enhance the scope, speed, scale, and volatility of global wealth financialization and financial transactions, accelerating the transfer and concentration of global wealth in a few countries or groups. In this context, failing to strengthen global joint regulation of stablecoins and cryptocurrency issuance and trading poses extremely high risks and dangers . Therefore, the surge in stablecoin and cryptocurrency development driven by the Trump administration in the United States has already revealed a huge bubble and potential risks, making it unsustainable. The international community must be highly vigilant about this! Stablecoin legislation could severely backfire on stablecoins. One unexpected outcome of stablecoin legislation is that the inclusion of fiat-backed stablecoins in legislative regulation will inevitably lead to legislative regulation of crypto asset transactions denominated and settled using fiat-backed stablecoins, including blockchain-generated assets such as Bitcoin and on-chain real-world assets (RWA). This will have a profound impact on stablecoins. Before crypto assets receive legislative regulation and compliance protection, licensed financial institutions such as banks find it difficult to directly participate in crypto asset trading, clearing, custody, and other related activities, thus ceding opportunities to private organizations outside of financial institutions. Due to the lack of regulation and the absence of regulatory costs, existing stablecoin issuers and crypto asset trading platforms have become highly profitable and attractive entities, exerting an increasing impact on banks and the financial system, forcing governments and monetary authorities in countries like the United States to accelerate legislative regulation of stablecoins. However, once crypto assets receive legislative regulation and compliance protection, banks and other financial institutions will undoubtedly participate fully. Payment institutions such as banks can directly promote the on-chain operation of fiat currency deposits (deposit tokenization), completely replacing stablecoins as a new channel and hub connecting the crypto world and the real world . Similarly, existing stock, bond, money market fund, and ETF exchanges can promote the on-chain trading of these relatively standardized financial products through RWA (Real-Time Asset Exchange). Having adequately regulated financial institutions such as banks act as the main entities connecting the crypto world and the real world on the blockchain is more conducive to implementing current legislative requirements for stablecoins, upholding the principle of "equal regulation for the same business" for all institutions, and reducing the impact and risks of crypto asset development on the existing monetary and financial system. This trend has already emerged in the United States and is rapidly intensifying, proving difficult to stop . Therefore, stablecoin legislation may seriously backfire on or subvert stablecoins ( see Wang Yongli's WeChat public account article "Stablecoin Legislation May Seriously Backfire on Stablecoins" on September 3, 2025 ). In this situation, it is not a reasonable choice for other countries to follow the US lead and vigorously promote stablecoin legislation and development. China should not follow the path of stablecoins taken by the United States. China already has a leading global advantage in mobile payments and the digital yuan. Promoting a stablecoin for the yuan has no advantage domestically, and it will have little room for development and influence internationally. It should not follow the path of the US dollar stablecoin, but should instead focus on promoting the development of stablecoins for the yuan, both domestically and offshore. More importantly, crypto assets and stablecoins like Bitcoin can achieve 24/7 global trading and clearing through borderless blockchains and crypto asset trading platforms. While this significantly improves efficiency, the highly anonymous and high-frequency global flow, lacking coordinated international oversight, makes it difficult to meet regulatory requirements such as KYC, AML, and FTC. This poses a clear risk and has been demonstrated in real-world cases of being used for money laundering, fundraising fraud, and illegal cross-border fund transfers. Given that US dollar stablecoins already dominate the crypto asset trading market, and the US has greater control or influence over major global blockchain operating systems, crypto asset trading platforms, and the exchange rate between crypto assets and the US dollar (as evidenced by the US's ability to trace, identify, freeze, and confiscate the crypto asset accounts of some institutions and individuals, and to punish or even arrest some crypto asset trading platforms and their leaders), China's development of a RMB stablecoin following the path of US dollar stablecoins not only fails to challenge the international status of US dollar stablecoins but may even turn the RMB stablecoin into a vassal of US dollar stablecoins. This could impact national tax collection, foreign exchange management, and cross-border capital flows, posing a serious threat to the sovereignty and security of the RMB and the stability of the monetary and financial system. Faced with a more acute and complex international situation, China should prioritize national security and exercise high vigilance and strict control over the trading and speculation of crypto assets, including stablecoins, rather than simply pursuing increased efficiency and reduced costs . It is necessary to accelerate the improvement of relevant regulatory policies and legal frameworks, focus on key links such as information flow and capital flow, strengthen information sharing among relevant departments, further enhance monitoring and tracking capabilities, and severely crack down on illegal and criminal activities involving crypto assets. Of course, while resolutely halting stablecoins and cracking down on virtual currency trading and speculation, we must also accelerate the innovative development and widespread application of the digital yuan at home and abroad, establish the international leading advantage of the digital yuan, forge a Chinese path for the development of digital currency, and actively explore the establishment of a fair, reasonable and secure new international monetary and financial system . Taking into account the above factors, it is not difficult to understand why China has chosen to resolutely curb virtual currencies, including stablecoins, while firmly promoting and accelerating the development of the digital yuan.
Share
PANews2025/12/06 15:08