Citadel Securities Advocates SEC Regulation for DeFi Tokenized US Stocks Amid Crypto Backlash

Citadel Securities urges the SEC to regulate DeFi platforms offering tokenized US stocks under existing securities laws, rejecting broad exemptive relief to maintain a technology-neutral approach and ensure investor protections.

Citadel Securities argues DeFi platforms qualify as exchanges or broker-dealers when trading tokenized equities.
Crypto community backlash highlights concerns over stifling innovation and driving development offshore.
Industry groups like SIFMA echo the call, citing recent market disruptions as reasons for uniform regulation, with tokenized money market funds reaching $9 billion.

Discover Citadel Securities’ push for stricter SEC oversight on DeFi tokenized stocks regulation. Explore community reactions and implications for blockchain innovation. Stay informed on crypto policy shifts.

What is Citadel Securities’ Position on DeFi Tokenized Stocks Regulation?

DeFi tokenized stocks regulation involves applying traditional securities laws to blockchain-based platforms trading digital versions of US equities. Citadel Securities, a major market maker, submitted a letter to the SEC on Tuesday, asserting that DeFi developers, smart-contract creators, and self-custody wallet providers should not receive broad exemptive relief for facilitating such trades. The firm emphasizes that these platforms likely meet the criteria for “exchanges” or “broker-dealers” under the Exchange Act, advocating for a consistent regulatory framework to avoid creating parallel regimes for the same assets.

This stance comes amid the SEC’s ongoing review of tokenized real-world assets, where Citadel warns that exemptions could undermine market integrity. By prioritizing investor protections, the recommendation aligns with broader efforts to integrate blockchain innovations without compromising established safeguards.

Why Has the Crypto Community Reacted Strongly to Citadel’s Recommendation?

The crypto community’s sharp response to Citadel Securities’ letter stems from fears that heightened DeFi tokenized stocks regulation could hinder decentralized finance’s growth and push innovation away from the US. Lawyer and Blockchain Association board member Jake Chervinsky remarked on Thursday, “Whoever thought Citadel would be against innovation that removes predatory, rent-seeking intermediaries from the financial system? Oh, right, literally every single person in crypto.” This sarcasm underscores the perception that traditional finance giants like Citadel benefit from existing intermediary roles, which DeFi aims to disrupt through peer-to-peer protocols.

Uniswap founder Hayden Adams amplified this view, stating it “makes sense the king of shady TradFi market makers doesn’t like open source, peer-to-peer tech that can lower the barrier to liquidity creation.” Such critiques highlight ideological clashes between centralized finance (TradFi) and decentralized alternatives. Summer Mersinger, CEO of the Blockchain Association, a leading crypto advocacy group, warned that “regulating software developers as if they were financial intermediaries would undermine US competitiveness, drive innovation offshore, and do nothing to advance investor protection.” She urged the SEC to target actual intermediaries controlling user assets rather than developers providing open-source tools.

Supporting data from recent market trends reinforces these concerns. Tokenized money market funds have surged to $9 billion in value, demonstrating DeFi’s potential efficiency, yet the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) has cautioned about emerging risks like liquidity mismatches and counterparty exposures. The Blockchain Association’s position, as visualized in illustrative materials from their reports, emphasizes fostering innovation while addressing genuine risks. Citadel’s prior July correspondence to the SEC’s Crypto Task Force similarly critiqued tokenized securities’ reliance on regulatory arbitrage over true efficiency gains, fueling the ongoing debate.

In the broader context, this backlash reflects deeper tensions. The crypto sector has seen repeated regulatory scrutiny, with events like the October flash crash serving as reminders of volatility. According to the World Federation of Exchanges, major stock exchanges have also opposed innovation exemptions for crypto firms, arguing in November that they could erode market quality. These developments illustrate how DeFi tokenized stocks regulation remains a flashpoint, balancing technological promise against financial stability imperatives.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Are Tokenized US Stocks in DeFi?

Tokenized US stocks in DeFi represent digital versions of traditional equities on blockchain networks, enabling decentralized trading without intermediaries. Platforms use smart contracts to mirror stock ownership, but Citadel Securities argues this triggers securities laws. Regulating them ensures compliance while supporting blockchain’s efficiency in custody and settlement.

How Might SEC Regulations Impact DeFi Innovation?

SEC regulations on DeFi could require platforms to register as exchanges, increasing compliance costs and potentially slowing US-based development. Advocacy groups like the Blockchain Association warn this might offshore talent, but proponents say it protects investors from risks seen in past crypto disruptions. Overall, a balanced approach could integrate DeFi into mainstream finance.

Key Takeaways

Citadel’s Regulatory Push: Recommends no exemptions for DeFi in tokenized stocks to uphold a unified securities framework.
Community Backlash: Highlights fears of reduced innovation, with quotes from experts like Hayden Adams criticizing TradFi resistance.
Industry Alignment: Groups like SIFMA support uniform rules, citing surges in tokenized funds and market crash lessons for investor safeguards.

Conclusion

Citadel Securities’ advocacy for rigorous DeFi tokenized stocks regulation underscores the need for a technology-neutral approach in overseeing blockchain-based securities trading. With backing from trade associations like SIFMA and warnings from the BIS on tokenized asset risks, the debate emphasizes protecting investors amid DeFi’s rapid evolution. As the SEC refines its stance, stakeholders must collaborate to harness innovation without compromising market integrity—urging developers and regulators alike to prioritize sustainable growth in the crypto ecosystem.

Citadel Securities argued that DeFi platforms offering tokenized US stocks should be regulated under securities laws and not get exemptive relief from the SEC.

Market maker Citadel Securities has recommended that the Securities and Exchange Commission tighten regulations on decentralized finance when it comes to tokenized stocks, causing backlash from crypto users.

Citadel Securities told the SEC in a letter on Tuesday that DeFi developers, smart-contract coders, and self-custody wallet providers should not be given “broad exemptive relief” for offering trading of tokenized US equities.

It argued that DeFi trading platforms likely fall under the definitions of an “exchange” or “broker-dealer” and should be regulated under securities laws if offering tokenized stocks.

“Granting broad exemptive relief to facilitate the trading of a tokenized share via DeFi protocols would create two separate regulatory regimes for the trading of the same security,” it argued. “This outcome would be the exact opposite of the “technology-neutral” approach taken by the Exchange Act.”

Citadel’s letter, made in response to the SEC looking for feedback on how it should approach regulating tokenized stocks, has drawn considerable backlash from the crypto community and organizations advocating for innovation in the blockchain space.

Crypto users, Blockchain Association hits out

“Whoever thought Citadel would be against innovation that removes predatory, rent-seeking intermediaries from the financial system?” asked lawyer and Blockchain Association board member Jake Chervinsky on Thursday.

“Oh, right, literally every single person in crypto,” he added.

Uniswap founder Hayden Adams added that it “makes sense the king of shady TradFi market makers doesn’t like open source, peer-to-peer tech that can lower the barrier to liquidity creation.”

Summer Mersinger, CEO of the crypto advocacy group the Blockchain Association, said that “regulating software developers as if they were financial intermediaries would undermine US competitiveness, drive innovation offshore, and do nothing to advance investor protection.”

Source: Blockchain Association

“We urge the SEC to reject this overbroad and unworkable approach and instead focus regulatory attention on actual intermediaries who stand between users and their assets,” she added.

Related: Tokenized money market funds surge to $9B; BIS warns of new risks

Citadel wrote to the SEC’s Crypto Task Force in July to argue that tokenized securities “must achieve success by delivering real innovation and efficiency to market participants, rather than through self-serving regulatory arbitrage.”

SIFMA also urges no DeFi carve out

The Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), an industry trade group, issued a similar statement on Wednesday, supporting innovation but insisting that tokenized securities must be subject to the same fundamental TradFi investor protections.

It argued that recent disruptions in crypto markets, including the October flash crash, were “timely reminders of why long-standing securities regulatory frameworks designed to preserve market quality and protect investors were originally created.”

The statement echoes the stance the trade group made in July, rejecting any SEC exemptive relief for blockchain and DeFi platforms issuing tokenized assets.

In November, the World Federation of Exchanges, a group representing major stock exchanges, urged the SEC to abandon its plan to grant an “innovation exemption” to crypto companies seeking to offer tokenized stocks.

Magazine: Animoca’s bet on altcoin upside, analyst eyes $100K Bitcoin: Hodler’s Digest

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/citadel-securities-advocates-sec-regulation-for-defi-tokenized-us-stocks-amid-crypto-backlash

Highlights: US prosecutors requested a 12-year prison sentence for Do Kwon after the Terra collapse. Terraform’s $40 billion downfall caused huge losses and sparked a long downturn in crypto markets. Do Kwon will face sentencing on December 11 and must give up $19 million in earnings. US prosecutors have asked a judge to give Do Kwon, Terraform Labs co-founder, a 12-year prison sentence for his role in the remarkable $40 billion collapse of the Terra and Luna tokens. The request also seeks to finalize taking away Kwon’s criminal earnings. The court filing came in New York’s Southern District on Thursday. This is about four months after Kwon admitted guilt on two charges: wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud. Prosecutors said Kwon caused more losses than Samuel Bankman-Fried, Alexander Mashinsky, and Karl Sebastian Greenwood combined. U.S. prosecutors have asked a New York federal judge to sentence Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon to 12 years in prison, calling his role in the 2022 TerraUSD collapse a “colossal” fraud that triggered broader crypto-market failures, including the downfall of FTX. Sentencing is… — Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) December 5, 2025 Terraform Collapse Shakes Crypto Market Authorities explained that Terraform’s collapse affected the entire crypto market. They said it helped trigger what is now called the ‘Crypto Winter.’ The filing stressed that Kwon’s conduct harmed many investors and the broader crypto world. On Thursday, prosecutors said Kwon must give up just over $19 million. They added that they will not ask for any additional restitution. They said: “The cost and time associated with calculating each investor-victim’s loss, determining whether the victim has already been compensated through the pending bankruptcy, and then paying out a percentage of the victim’s losses, will delay payment and diminish the amount of money ultimately paid to victims.” Authorities will sentence Do Kwon on December 11. They charged him in March 2023 with multiple crimes, including securities fraud, market manipulation, money laundering, and wire fraud. All connections are tied to his role at Terraform. After Terra fell in 2022, authorities lost track of Kwon until they arrested him in Montenegro on unrelated charges and sent him to the U.S. Do Kwon’s Legal Case and Sentencing In April last year, a jury ruled that both Terraform and Kwon committed civil fraud. They found the company and its co-founder misled investors about how the business operated and its finances. Jay Clayton, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, submitted the sentencing request in November. TERRA STATEMENT: “We are very disappointed with the verdict, which we do not believe is supported by the evidence. We continue to maintain that the SEC does not have the legal authority to bring this case at all, and we are carefully weighing our options and next steps.” — Zack Guzmán (@zGuz) April 5, 2024 The news of Kwon’s sentencing caused Terraform’s token, LUNA, to jump over 40% in one day, from $0.07 to $0.10. Still, this rise remains small compared to its all-time high of more than $19, which the ecosystem reached before collapsing in May 2022. In a November court filing, Do Kwon’s lawyers asked for a maximum five-year sentence. They argued for a shorter term partly because he could face up to 40 years in prison in South Korea, where prosecutors are also pursuing a case against him. The legal team added that even if Kwon serves time in the U.S., he would not be released freely. He would be moved from prison to an immigration detention center and then sent to Seoul to face pretrial detention for his South Korea charges. eToro Platform Best Crypto Exchange Over 90 top cryptos to trade Regulated by top-tier entities User-friendly trading app 30+ million users 9.9 Visit eToro eToro is a multi-asset investment platform. The value of your investments may go up or down. Your capital is at risk. Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment, and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong.