The post Bitcoin Treasury Firms Enter ‘Darwinian Phase’: Galaxy Research appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin treasury companies are entering a “Darwinian phase” as the core mechanics of their once-booming business model break down, according to a new analysis from Galaxy Research. The report said that the digital asset treasury (DAT) trade has reached its natural limit as equity prices fell below Bitcoin (BTC) net asset value (NAV), causing the issuance-driven growth loop to reverse and turning leverage into a liability. That breaking point arrived as Bitcoin dropped from its October peak near $126,000 to lows around $80,000, triggering a sharp contraction in risk appetite and draining liquidity across the market. The October 10 deleveraging event accelerated the shift, wiping out open interest across futures markets and weakening spot depth. “For treasury companies whose equities had been serving as leveraged crypto trades, the shift has been intense,” Galaxy said, adding that the “same financial engineering that amplified upside has magnified downside.” Related: Cantor slashes Strategy target by 60%, tells clients forced-sale fears are overblown DAT stocks flip to discounts DAT stocks that traded at rich premiums to NAV over the summer are now mostly at discounts, even as Bitcoin itself is down only around 30% from highs. Companies such as Metaplanet and Nakamoto, which previously showed hundreds of millions in unrealized gains, are now deep in the red as average BTC purchase prices sit above $107,000. Galaxy noted that the leverage embedded in these firms is exposing them to extreme downside, with one firm, NAKA, plunging more than 98% from its peak. “This price action resembles the kind of wipeouts seen in memecoin markets,” the firm wrote. Metaplanet’s unrealized PnL reaches $530 million. Source: Galaxy With issuance no longer available, Galaxy outlined three possible paths from here. The base case is a prolonged period of compressed premiums, during which BTC-per-share growth stagnates and DAT equities… The post Bitcoin Treasury Firms Enter ‘Darwinian Phase’: Galaxy Research appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin treasury companies are entering a “Darwinian phase” as the core mechanics of their once-booming business model break down, according to a new analysis from Galaxy Research. The report said that the digital asset treasury (DAT) trade has reached its natural limit as equity prices fell below Bitcoin (BTC) net asset value (NAV), causing the issuance-driven growth loop to reverse and turning leverage into a liability. That breaking point arrived as Bitcoin dropped from its October peak near $126,000 to lows around $80,000, triggering a sharp contraction in risk appetite and draining liquidity across the market. The October 10 deleveraging event accelerated the shift, wiping out open interest across futures markets and weakening spot depth. “For treasury companies whose equities had been serving as leveraged crypto trades, the shift has been intense,” Galaxy said, adding that the “same financial engineering that amplified upside has magnified downside.” Related: Cantor slashes Strategy target by 60%, tells clients forced-sale fears are overblown DAT stocks flip to discounts DAT stocks that traded at rich premiums to NAV over the summer are now mostly at discounts, even as Bitcoin itself is down only around 30% from highs. Companies such as Metaplanet and Nakamoto, which previously showed hundreds of millions in unrealized gains, are now deep in the red as average BTC purchase prices sit above $107,000. Galaxy noted that the leverage embedded in these firms is exposing them to extreme downside, with one firm, NAKA, plunging more than 98% from its peak. “This price action resembles the kind of wipeouts seen in memecoin markets,” the firm wrote. Metaplanet’s unrealized PnL reaches $530 million. Source: Galaxy With issuance no longer available, Galaxy outlined three possible paths from here. The base case is a prolonged period of compressed premiums, during which BTC-per-share growth stagnates and DAT equities…

Bitcoin Treasury Firms Enter ‘Darwinian Phase’: Galaxy Research

2025/12/06 23:43

Bitcoin treasury companies are entering a “Darwinian phase” as the core mechanics of their once-booming business model break down, according to a new analysis from Galaxy Research.

The report said that the digital asset treasury (DAT) trade has reached its natural limit as equity prices fell below Bitcoin (BTC) net asset value (NAV), causing the issuance-driven growth loop to reverse and turning leverage into a liability.

That breaking point arrived as Bitcoin dropped from its October peak near $126,000 to lows around $80,000, triggering a sharp contraction in risk appetite and draining liquidity across the market. The October 10 deleveraging event accelerated the shift, wiping out open interest across futures markets and weakening spot depth.

“For treasury companies whose equities had been serving as leveraged crypto trades, the shift has been intense,” Galaxy said, adding that the “same financial engineering that amplified upside has magnified downside.”

Related: Cantor slashes Strategy target by 60%, tells clients forced-sale fears are overblown

DAT stocks flip to discounts

DAT stocks that traded at rich premiums to NAV over the summer are now mostly at discounts, even as Bitcoin itself is down only around 30% from highs. Companies such as Metaplanet and Nakamoto, which previously showed hundreds of millions in unrealized gains, are now deep in the red as average BTC purchase prices sit above $107,000.

Galaxy noted that the leverage embedded in these firms is exposing them to extreme downside, with one firm, NAKA, plunging more than 98% from its peak. “This price action resembles the kind of wipeouts seen in memecoin markets,” the firm wrote.

Metaplanet’s unrealized PnL reaches $530 million. Source: Galaxy

With issuance no longer available, Galaxy outlined three possible paths from here. The base case is a prolonged period of compressed premiums, during which BTC-per-share growth stagnates and DAT equities offer more downside than Bitcoin itself.

A second outcome is consolidation, when firms that issued heavily at high premiums, bought BTC near the top, or loaded up on debt, face solvency pressure and may be acquired or restructured. A third scenario leaves room for recovery if Bitcoin eventually reaches new all-time highs, but only for companies that preserved liquidity and avoided over-issuing during the boom.

Related: Can the biggest Bitcoin whales really decide when the market turns green or red?

Strategy raises $1.44 billion to quell dividend fears

On Friday, Strategy CEO Phong Le said the company’s new $1.44 billion cash reserve was created to calm investor anxiety over its ability to meet dividend and debt obligations during Bitcoin’s downturn. Funded through a stock sale, the reserve is designed to secure at least 12 months of dividend payments, with plans to extend that buffer to 24 months.

Meanwhile, Bitwise chief investment officer Matt Hougan has said that Strategy won’t be forced to sell Bitcoin to stay afloat if its share price drops, and those who say otherwise are “just flat wrong.”

Magazine: 2026 is the year of pragmatic privacy in crypto — Canton, Zcash and more

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-treasury-firms-enter-darwinian-phase-as-premiums-collapse?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers

Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers

The post Citadel pushes SEC to classify open-source developers as unregistered stockbrokers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On Dec. 2, Citadel Securities filed a 13-page letter with the SEC arguing that decentralized protocols facilitating tokenized US equity trading already meet statutory definitions of exchanges and broker-dealers, and regulators should treat them accordingly. Two days later, the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee convened a panel on tokenized equities that made clear the question is no longer whether stocks can move on-chain, but whether they can do so without dismantling the permissionless architecture that built DeFi. The gap between those two positions now defines the most consequential regulatory fight in crypto since the Howey test debates. Citadel’s letter arrived at the moment when tokenized equities stopped being a thought experiment. The firm welcomes tokenization in principle but insists that realizing its benefits requires applying “the key bedrock principles and investor protections that underpin the fairness, efficiency, and resiliency of US equity markets.” In other words, the document suggests that companies seeking to trade tokenized Apple shares must comply with Nasdaq rules, including transparent fees, consolidated tape reporting, market surveillance, fair access, and registration as an exchange or broker-dealer. The filing warns that granting broad exemptive relief to DeFi platforms creates a shadow US equity market in which liquidity fragments, retail investors lose Exchange Act protections, and incumbents face regulatory arbitrage from unregistered competitors. Within hours, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams fired back on X, calling Citadel’s position an attempt to “treat software developers of decentralized protocols like centralized intermediaries.” He invoked ConstitutionDAO, the 2021 crowdfunding effort that pooled $47 million in Ethereum to bid on a first-edition Constitution at Sotheby’s, only to lose to Griffin’s $43.2 million bid. Additionally, Adams zeroed in on Citadel’s fair-access argument, calling it “actual nerve” from the dominant player in retail order flow. The exchange captured crypto’s core narrative of permissionless code versus gatekeeper control and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 02:32
RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved

RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved

The post RWA Tokenization and Crypto Activities Declared High-Risk, Unapproved appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways: Seven major Chinese financial associations issued a coordinated warning against RWA tokenization and all virtual-currency-related activity. Regulators stressed that no RWA tokenization projects are authorized in China, citing risks of fraud, speculation, and illegal fundraising. Institutions and individuals were told to avoid all forms of crypto involvement, while enforcement measures widen to include foreign firms serving mainland users. China has delivered one of its strongest signals yet that crypto-linked products, especially RWA tokenization remain firmly off-limits. A rare joint notice issued by seven national financial associations warns that emerging narratives around “stablecoins,” “air coins,” mining, and tokenized real-world assets are now being used as fronts for fraudulent fundraising, cross-border fund transfers, and market manipulation. Below is a structured, journalist-style breakdown of the alert, written uniquely, with expanded insights to help readers understand the regulatory landscape and its implications for global crypto markets. Read More: China to Shake Crypto Markets With First-Ever Yuan Stablecoin Plan Amid U.S. Dollar Dominance China’s Joint Warning: RWA Tokenization Not Approved and Considered High-Risk China’s latest advisory makes it clear that the rapid rise of RWA tokenization in global markets does not translate into tolerance at home. The notice states that financial regulators have not approved any RWA token issuance, trading, or financing activities inside the mainland. Officials emphasized that tokenizing traditional assets such as bonds, real estate claims, or corporate receivables introduces several layers of risk. These include: Fake or unverifiable underlying assets Operational and governance failures Speculative hype marketed as financial innovation Use of RWA tokens for illegal fundraising or unapproved securities issuance The message is unambiguous: any assumption that RWAs occupy a regulatory grey zone in China is incorrect. They are grouped alongside virtual currencies, mining schemes, and stablecoins as activities that can trigger criminal liability when conducted domestically. Why RWAs…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 02:40