TLDR Arkham to drop Linea, Manta, and Blast L2s from its platform starting January 11. Decision follows Arkham’s routine chain review focused on user activity andTLDR Arkham to drop Linea, Manta, and Blast L2s from its platform starting January 11. Decision follows Arkham’s routine chain review focused on user activity and

Arkham Ends Support for Three L2 Chains Including Linea and Blast

TLDR

  • Arkham to drop Linea, Manta, and Blast L2s from its platform starting January 11.
  • Decision follows Arkham’s routine chain review focused on user activity and relevance.

  • Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Mantle, and Polygon zkEVM remain supported by Arkham.

  • Linea faced issues in 2025 but stabilized before its token airdrop launch.


Arkham Intelligence will stop supporting the Linea, Blast, and Manta Layer-2 networks on its intelligence platform. The removal will take effect on January 11, 2026, as part of Arkham’s periodic review of chain integrations.

According to Arkham’s official statement, chains are assessed based on factors such as user demand, platform relevance, and their broader role in the crypto ecosystem. The company posted the update on its X page on January 9, noting that Linea had not met its criteria during the most recent evaluation.

While the specific reasons were not shared, users speculated that the lack of on-chain activity and lower adoption rates could be key factors. There has been no record of such removals in 2025, suggesting a new trend by Arkham to streamline its offerings.

Linea to Be Removed Alongside Manta and Blast

Linea, an Ethereum Layer-2 developed by Consensys, will be among the chains removed from Arkham. The blockchain had seen earlier traction but may have failed to maintain ongoing relevance.

Arkham confirmed that Blast and Manta would also be removed from its platform on the same day. These announcements were shared across the company’s social channels within days of each other. Users raised concerns about reduced transparency and the inability to track token flows without Arkham’s monitoring tools.

As of now, no further chains have been confirmed for removal, though Arkham may continue this review process as the year progresses.

Remaining L2s on Arkham’s Platform

Despite the removal of three L2s, several major Ethereum scaling networks continue to be supported on Arkham. These include Arbitrum, Base, Optimism, Mantle, and Polygon zkEVM.

All of these networks have maintained high user engagement, particularly after Ethereum’s 2024 Dencun upgrade, which helped offload transaction data from the mainnet to Layer-2s. This shift made many L2s more efficient and useful for scaling Ethereum transactions.

According to Arkham’s current platform data, these L2s consistently generate enough usage to warrant continued support. This suggests that Arkham is prioritizing performance and utility over chain diversity.

Ethereum’s Dencun upgrade in 2024 introduced protodanksharding, which allowed L2s to store data in separate blob space. This reduced the data competition on the Ethereum mainnet and improved Layer-2 efficiency.

Later upgrades, including Pectra and Fusaka in 2025, increased the blob capacity, further optimizing the network. As CoinCentral reported, these changes helped maintain activity across major L2s. The upcoming Glasterdam upgrade in 2026 is expected to expand blob handling even further.

These developments have helped the supported L2s continue growing, which may explain their retention on Arkham’s platform. Meanwhile, networks like Linea, Manta, and Blast may not have achieved comparable adoption.

As CoinCentral detailed, Linea had previously resolved a sequencer issue in 2025 just before its token airdrop. Although the problem was fixed quickly, it did not appear to change the network’s long-term usage trajectory.

The post Arkham Ends Support for Three L2 Chains Including Linea and Blast appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
LINEA Logo
LINEA Price(LINEA)
$0.005406
$0.005406$0.005406
-2.27%
USD
LINEA (LINEA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37