Manny Pangilinan's MGEN Corp., however, says the company that got a congressional franchise, Solar Para sa Bayan, is different from SP New Energy Corp. which MGENManny Pangilinan's MGEN Corp., however, says the company that got a congressional franchise, Solar Para sa Bayan, is different from SP New Energy Corp. which MGEN

Ombudsman Remulla says Leviste being probed for ‘selling’ solar franchise to Pangilinan

2026/01/11 19:25

MANILA, Philippines – Batangas Representative Leandro Leviste is being investigated for “selling” the franchise of his solar energy business to tycoon Manny V. Pangilinan, according to Ombudsman Jesus Crispin “Boying” Remulla. 

In a radio show on DZRH on Saturday, January 10, Remulla assailed Leviste for “flipping” Solar Philippines to Pangilinan after securing a franchise to put up solar microgrids in select provinces nationwide during the Rodrigo Duterte administration. 

“Kasi dapat yun yung franchise ‘di dapat ninenegosyo yun e. Batang-bata binebenta mo yung franchise, wala ka bang kahihiyan? Anong klaseng Pilipino yan?” he said. 

(A franchise shouldn’t be made into a business. He’s so young yet he’s selling a franchise, has he no shame? What kind of Filipino are you?) 

“National franchise, renewable energy, critical to the national life tapos ganun lang? Tapos, ‘bebenta mo, fi-flip mo lang? Nanay mo [Loren Legarda] pa senador,” Remulla said.

(National franchise, renewable energy, critical to national life and then you sell just like that? You sell it, you flip it. And your mother is even a senator.) 

Duterte signed Republic Act No. 11357 into law on July 31, 2019, providing a franchise to Leviste’s Solar Para Sa Bayan Corporation.

Remulla said this was the more important issue than the Cathy Cabral files which Leviste has exposed, adding that the files the congressman has are questionable. 

“Kasi marami s’yang ibang problema e. Yung  prangkisa n’ya ineembistiga na ngayon e… Yung ang pagusapan muna natin, bago ang lahat,” he said. 

(He has other problems. His franchise is being investigated now… That’s what we should talk about first before anything else.)

“Mas mabigat na isyu yung sa franchise n’ya. Remember, walang consent ang Congress sa transfer ng franchise na ‘yan. Critical ‘yan.

(His franchise is a bigger issue. Remember, there’s no consent from Congress for the transfer of the franchise. That’s critical.) 

Remulla also alleged that Leviste’s companies have a total of “84 cancelled [solar energy] contracts so far,” with significant impact on the country’s energy outlook. 

“Can you imagine the effect on the national energy situation. Sasabihin mo eto na ang forecast natin sa energy, andyan ang DOE [Department of Energy], naniniwala sayo, yun pala drawing lang,” he said.

(Can you imagine the effect on the national energy situation? You give a forecast on energy, the DOE is there, it believes you and then it turns out to be just a drawing.)

In an apparent response to Remulla’s statements, Leviste said he would respond to all the accusations made against him when Congress resumes its session on January 26. 

“Bibigyan ko kayo ng dalawang linggo para sabihin ang lahat. Sasagutin ko ang lahat sa pagbubukas ng Kongreso sa January 26,” Leviste said in a social media post, without specifying who he was referring to. 

(I will give you two weeks to say everything. I will answer all when Congress opens on January 26.)

During a Senate hearing on the budget of the Department of Energy (DOE) last October,  Energy Undersecretary Rowena Guevarra disclosed that 21 solar energy contracts of Leviste’s Solar Philippines are “being processed for termination due to the company’s failure to deliver the scheduled targets.” 

Rappler’s business columnist Val Villanueva, in his latest column, said the case of Leviste’s Solar Philippines “exposes how the country’s renewable-energy framework can be gamed.” 

Must Read

[Vantage Point] The Leviste gambit: Monetizing clean energy for political gains?

Pangilinan’s Metro Pacific Investments Corporation started investing in Leviste’s SP New Energy Corporation (SPNEC) in March 2023, and by December 2023, Manila Electric Company subsidiary, Meralco PowerGen Corporation (MGEN), had completed its P15.9-billion buyout in Leviste’s SP New Energy Corporation (SPNEC), effectively becoming the controlling shareholder with 50.5% voting rights.

Leviste became the vice chairman of SPNEC while Pangilinan assumed the role of chairman, president, and CEO of SPNEC. 

MGEN, in a media statement on Sunday, January 11, said SPNEC is a “separate and distinct corporate entity from Solar Para sa Bayan Corporation (SPBC),” the Leviste company that got a 25-year congressional franchise during the Duterte administration.

SPNEC, however, is a subsidiary of Solar Philippines.

“MGEN did not acquire any share in SPBC, which was awarded a congressional franchise thru Republic Act 11357 to construct and install and operate microgrids in remote areas. Moreover, MGEN is not privy to any transactions of SPBC nor to any circumstances that may relate to its compliance with its franchise,” the power firm said.

Thus, MGEN said “SPNEC’s business and operations are not dependent on the franchise mentioned.”

MGEN also insisted that its investment in SPNEC “did not violate any law or regulation,” noting that “the transactions of SPNEC, including the entry of MGEN through its affiliates” were “scrutinized and approved by the Philippine Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission.”

On Sunday, Leviste also reposted MGEN’s media statement on his Facebook page.

– Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Smart Pocket Logo
Smart Pocket Price(SP)
$0.0003296
$0.0003296$0.0003296
+0.09%
USD
Smart Pocket (SP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37