The Flow protocol can’t seem to catch a break, as Huobi HTX, an exchange linked to Justin Sun, publicly condemned the project’s recovery plans after it sufferedThe Flow protocol can’t seem to catch a break, as Huobi HTX, an exchange linked to Justin Sun, publicly condemned the project’s recovery plans after it suffered

Huobi HTX has called out the Flow network for creating an isolated recovery plan

The Flow protocol can’t seem to catch a break, as Huobi HTX, an exchange linked to Justin Sun, publicly condemned the project’s recovery plans after it suffered close to a $4 million exploit. 

An update shared via the Huobi official site detailed the major security incident that occurred on the Flow network in December last year, and claimed that after the incident, Huobi HTX immediately attempted to verify the situation by reaching out to the team and providing abnormal price monitoring and on-chain data.

Huobi criticizes Flow’s recovery plans

The report claims that after the project team confirmed the security incident, Huobi HTX continued to provide assistance to the project team in risk management and on-chain tracking, including providing relevant address information and related recharge information.

Through this process, Huobi HTX’s risk control and monitoring system continuously tracked abnormal capital flows and took restrictive measures on identifiable hacker-related assets to prevent further inflows into the market as much as possible while protecting the overall interests of currency holders.

However, the report claims that without fully communicating with the exchange and the community, the Flow project party decided to unilaterally promote its so-called “Isolated Recovery” plan through protocol layer authority.

Without mastering the private key, the team directly forcibly transferred its identified FLOW assets from centralized exchange addresses, including Huobi HTX. These assets included a large number of normal user positions obtained via real market transactions, and they were going to be unilaterally destroyed on January 30, 2026, according to plans announced by the team.

Huobi claims the approach not only seriously deviates from the decentralization principle that the blockchain should have, but it also fails to fully consider the legitimate rights and interests of the platform and its regular users.

Huobi HTX claims it was acting in the best interest of users and its community and continued to invest resources in monitoring, tracking, and coordination, striving to minimize the potential impact on users in a highly uncertain environment.

It has said it will continue to urge the Flow project team to handle this incident more transparently and responsibly, while fully respecting the legitimate rights and interests of users, exchange custody assets, and publish a complete and auditable post-analysis report.

The exchange has also said it will continue to synchronize the progress of the incident with users, and will provide explanations and follow-up as soon as possible in any situation that may affect users’ asset rights.

The collateral damage from the Flow exploit 

The hack that disrupted the Flow ecosystem went down on December 27, 2025.

The hacker minted counterfeit or duplicate tokens, which led to about $3.9 million in assets being drained and bridged out to other chains. To be clear, the exploit did not affect legitimate user deposits and balances; it only created fake assets.

In the days that followed, the Flow team claimed there was no other logical way forward than to initiate a rollback that would restore the network to a pre-hack state while removing unauthorized transactions from the ledger.

The rollback raised eyebrows and critics like Alex Smirnov, whose company, deBridge, is integrated with Flow, alleged the team had reached the decision to effect a rollback without communicating or coordinating with his platform, even though it had claimed they were synchronizing with critical partners.

After consulting, the foundation altered course, switching to a targeted recovery approach that saw it maintain most valid transactions on-chain and only process transactions that failed to act correctly. The plan saw affected accounts temporarily frozen as forensic analysis was carried out to identify and fully remediate the illicitly minted tokens.

The foundation called it the “scalpel” approach and claimed it would enable them to resolve the issue while staying true to their principles of decentralization.

Claim your free seat in an exclusive crypto trading community - limited to 1,000 members.

Market Opportunity
HTX DAO Logo
HTX DAO Price(HTX)
$0.000001674
$0.000001674$0.000001674
+0.11%
USD
HTX DAO (HTX) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37