The post Vitalik Buterin Calls for ‘New Designs’ of DAOs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has called for new decentralizedThe post Vitalik Buterin Calls for ‘New Designs’ of DAOs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has called for new decentralized

Vitalik Buterin Calls for ‘New Designs’ of DAOs

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has called for new decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) designs, arguing that the sector needs more than token-voting treasuries if it wants to improve on traditional corporate and political structures. 

In a Monday X post, Buterin said that current DAOs often amount to “a treasury controlled by token holder voting.”

That model is widely copied but it is “inefficient, vulnerable to capture and fails utterly at the goal of mitigating the weaknesses of human politics,” he said.

Buterin argued that DAOs should solve specific infrastructure problems, starting with better oracles, onchain dispute resolution and long‑term project stewardship.

He also highlighted the need for DAOs for subjective disputes (such as insurance outcomes), maintain shared lists like anti‑scam registries and standard formats to spin up short‑lived funding vehicles and keep projects alive after core teams disappear.

Vitalik Buterin calls for new designs of DAOs. Source: Vitalik Buterin

Related: Vitalik calls for a ‘garbage collection’ function to stop Ethereum bloat

Concave vs. convex: different DAOs for different problems

​Buterin framed his thinking using his earlier “convex vs concave” governance lens. For “concave” problems, where compromise is “better than a coin flip,” DAOs should maximize robustness by aggregating input from many sources.

For “convex” problems that require decisive bets, he said it was more appropriate to allow strong leadership and treat decentralization to hold leaders to account, rather than a full replacement.

​To make such systems work in practice, DAOs must solve privacy issues and “decision fatigue,” Buterin said.

Without privacy, governance becomes a “social game,” and if participants are asked to vote constantly, engagement falls off after an initial burst of enthusiasm. He pointed to zero‑knowledge proofs and, in some cases, secure multi‑party computation and fully homomorphic encryption to secure privacy.

He also suggested that artificial intelligence could help reduce decision fatigue by supporting analysis or allowing users to delegate voting to locally controlled models, while cautioning against DAOs being run by AI.

Related: Why Ethereum’s ‘walkaway test’ and quantum readiness matter more than ever

Low turnout, whale capture and the case for next‑gen DAOs 

Buterin’s post comes as DAO ecosystems are growing but struggle with participation and concentration. 

DAO tokens have a market capitalization of at least $17.5 billion, according to CoinMarketCap.

While mature DAOs like Aave DAO and the Optimism Collective have used onchain governance to manage major decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols and fund public goods, Buterin argued that projects designing new oracles or governance systems should treat DAO design and the surrounding communication layer as “50% of their job, not 10%,” if they want Ethereum’s decentralized base layer to carry through to the apps built on top.

Magazine: Ethereum’s Fusaka fork explained for dummies — What the hell is PeerDAS?

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently. Read our Editorial Policy https://cointelegraph.com/editorial-policy

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/vitalik-buterin-calls-new-design-daos?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound

Market Opportunity
ZeroLend Logo
ZeroLend Price(ZERO)
$0.00000693
$0.00000693$0.00000693
-5.00%
USD
ZeroLend (ZERO) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Talent Technology Company Cappfinity accelerates growth plans through Chief Talent Management Officer appointment

Talent Technology Company Cappfinity accelerates growth plans through Chief Talent Management Officer appointment

LONDON, Jan. 20, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Cappfinity is pleased to announce the promotion of Stephanie Hopper to the role of Chief Talent Management Officer, marking
Share
AI Journal2026/01/20 15:30
TRX Technical Analysis Jan 20

TRX Technical Analysis Jan 20

The post TRX Technical Analysis Jan 20 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TRX is consolidating at the $0.31 level while showing a short-term bullish tendency
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 15:27