The post U.S. Treasury Criticizes EU’s Response to Greenland Tariffs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: U.S. Treasury Bassett critiques EU’s responseThe post U.S. Treasury Criticizes EU’s Response to Greenland Tariffs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: U.S. Treasury Bassett critiques EU’s response

U.S. Treasury Criticizes EU’s Response to Greenland Tariffs

Key Points:
  • U.S. Treasury Bassett critiques EU’s response efficiency.
  • EU likely establishing a working group.
  • Potential delay in counter-coercion instrument activation.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Bassett expressed skepticism about the EU’s quick response to Trump’s proposed ‘Greenland Tariffs’ during a forum in Davos, Switzerland, on January 20.

Bassett’s comments highlight concerns over EU decision-making inefficiencies, potentially impacting transatlantic trade dynamics amid substantial geopolitical tensions.

Bassett’s Doubts on EU’s Greenland Tariffs Strategy

U.S. Treasury Secretary Bassett, during the World Economic Forum in Davos, expressed doubts about the EU’s swift response to the U.S.’s “Greenland Tariffs.” Bassett suggested that the EU would likely form a “dreadful European working group” as its initial step, a decision he views as the union’s strongest possible reaction. This response stems from what Bassett perceives as the EU’s lack of decision-making efficiency amidst its 27 member states.

“The ability of the EU’s internal mechanisms to align swiftly is often overestimated,” Bassett remarked. Bassett’s comments signal a potential lack of immediate resolution in trade tensions between the U.S. and the EU. He noted that the activation of the EU’s counter-coercion instrument might face delays, possibly hampering complete access for U.S. companies into the EU single market. This situation could reflect broader economic coercion challenges faced by the EU in the current global trade climate.

Washington’s overall reaction appears dismissive of the EU’s ability to deploy its counter-coercion strategies efficiently. Bassett remarked to reporters that despite having this regulatory tool, “I think they will first establish that ‘dreadful European working group.’” The sentiment from Bassett’s statements suggests that the anticipated actions might lack the impact needed for an effective response.

EU’s Counter-Coercion Instrument Faces First Major Test

Did you know? The EU’s Anti-Coercion Instrument, initiated in late 2023, aims to counteract economic pressures but has never been deployed against a significant trade partner like the U.S., potentially testing its effectiveness in practice now.

Bitcoin (BTC) currently trades at $90,986.03 with a market cap of $1.82 trillion, maintaining a market dominance of 59.01%, as per CoinMarketCap. BTC’s 24-hour trading volume is $34.96 billion, reflecting a -1.87% change. The circulating supply stands at 19,978,256, against a max supply of 21 million.

Bitcoin(BTC), daily chart, screenshot on CoinMarketCap at 08:08 UTC on January 20, 2026. Source: CoinMarketCap

Coincu’s research team notes that the EU’s delay in activating the counter-coercion instrument may lead to protracted trade tensions. With potential restraints on market access, U.S. firms might face challenges, increasing the stakes for both sides. Historical trade conflicts underline these geopolitical tensions.

Source: https://coincu.com/news/us-treasury-criticizes-eu-response/

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.002426
$0.002426$0.002426
-4.75%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37