The Commission on Audit (CoA) has filed four fraud audit reports involving more than P325 million worth of flood control projects in Bulacan, citing ghost projectsThe Commission on Audit (CoA) has filed four fraud audit reports involving more than P325 million worth of flood control projects in Bulacan, citing ghost projects

CoA files 4 fraud audit reports worth over P325 million for Bulacan flood control projects; flags ghost projects, unauthorized relocations, and questionable accomplishments

The Commission on Audit (CoA) has filed four fraud audit reports involving more than P325 million worth of flood control projects in Bulacan, citing ghost projects, unauthorized relocation of project sites, and questionable claims of completion.

In reports submitted to the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI), the CoA said the projects were implemented by the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH)-Bulacan 1st District Engineering Office and awarded to contractors Wawao Builders and Darcy and Anna Builders & Trading. The audit found recurring indicators of systemic misuse of public funds in projects intended to mitigate flooding in vulnerable communities.

The CoA said its findings underscore the agency’s commitment to transparency and accountability, stressing that funds earmarked for public safety must not be diverted through corruption.

Ghost projects and dubious accomplishments

Based on physical inspections, drone surveillance, geotagged photographs, and historical satellite imagery, auditors uncovered several irregularities. In some cases, no flood control or riverbank protection structures were found at the approved project sites despite documents declaring the projects completed or substantially accomplished.

The CoA also reported instances where DPWH representatives directed inspectors to locations different from those specified in approved bid documents and contracts, without any authorized revised plans — violations of procurement and contract rules. In other locations, satellite images showed that riverbank protection structures already existed before the contracts took effect, raising the possibility that public funds were used to pay for works that were not newly constructed.

The audit further flagged severe documentation deficiencies, including missing as-built plans, detailed cost estimates, geotechnical investigation reports, complete statements of work accomplished, and approved master plans, which auditors said undermined the credibility of reported accomplishments and payments.

Projects under scrutiny

Among the projects cited was the P96.49-million construction of a riverbank protection structure in Barangay Santa Cruz, Guiguinto, Bulacan, awarded to Wawao Builders. The CoA found that the structure was not built at the approved site and appeared to have been relocated without authority, with discrepancies in project length and design.

Another Wawao Builders project worth P77.19 million in Barangay Iba-Ibayo, Hagonoy, Bulacan, was declared 100% complete, but auditors found no structure at the designated site. The structure pointed out by DPWH officials was located about 694 meters away and had no approved authority for relocation.

In Calumpit, Bulacan, a P77.19-million riverbank protection project also awarded to Wawao Builders showed inconsistencies in location and measurements, with a structure bearing a different contract identification and located outside the approved site.

The CoA also flagged a P74.12-million project in Barangay Babatnin, Malolos City, awarded to Darcy and Anna Builders & Trading. Auditors confirmed that no structure was built at the approved site, while the structure identified by DPWH officials predated the contract by nearly a year based on satellite imagery. Progress photos submitted by the contractor also contained embedded coordinates inconsistent with the approved project location.

The fraud audit reports named several DPWH engineers and officials, as well as representatives of the contractors, as persons potentially liable.

Possible charges, more reports expected

The CoA said the individuals involved may face charges for graft and corruption under the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, as well as malversation and falsification of public documents under the Revised Penal Code. Possible violations of CoA Circular No. 2009-001 were also noted.

The fraud audit forms part of a broader investigation ordered by CoA Chairperson Gamaliel A. Cordoba in August 2025, directing an immediate review of DPWH flood control projects in Bulacan from July 2022 to May 2025 amid public concerns over alleged ghost projects.

The CoA said it will continue to submit additional reports to the ICI as the investigation progresses, in line with President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr.’s call for greater transparency and accountability in government spending.


Spotlight is BusinessWorld’s sponsored section that allows advertisers to amplify their brand and connect with BusinessWorld’s audience by publishing their stories on the BusinessWorld Web site. For more information, send an email to [email protected].

Join us on Viber at https://bit.ly/3hv6bLA to get more updates and subscribe to BusinessWorld’s titles and get exclusive content through www.bworld-x.com.

Market Opportunity
Alliance Games Logo
Alliance Games Price(COA)
$0,002963
$0,002963$0,002963
0,00%
USD
Alliance Games (COA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37