Peter Schiff is back with another warning on Bitcoin, this time tying it directly to silver’s explosive rally. The long-time precious metals advocate believes BitcoinPeter Schiff is back with another warning on Bitcoin, this time tying it directly to silver’s explosive rally. The long-time precious metals advocate believes Bitcoin

Bitcoin critic Peter Schiff recycles collapse warning as silver surges

Peter Schiff is back with another warning on Bitcoin, this time tying it directly to silver’s explosive rally. The long-time precious metals advocate believes Bitcoin is heading towards a sharp downturn, one that will look even worse as silver continues to surge.

On January 19, silver broke $94, continuing a trend that has transformed the precious metals market over the previous 12 months. Due to increased industrial demand and limited supply, prices have consistently reached new highs since 2024.

Real demand drives silver’s climb

Schiff took advantage of this to issue his most recent warning. “What’s happening with silver is about to happen with Bitcoin, only in reverse,” he said in a post on X. “Bitcoin’s disastrous demise will be brought on by silver’s meteoric surge. Don’t claim that I didn’t warn you.”

His comments quickly sparked new debates between supporters of traditional investing and digital assets. These types of arguments are nothing new for Schiff, who has long contended that Bitcoin is worthless.

Similar increases in the usage of silver have been observed in facilities housing semiconductor makers and data servers, resulting in continuing supply shortfalls that drive up prices.

Bitcoin has struggled to match silver’s results. Although BTC rose above $97,000 earlier this month during a brief surge, it failed to maintain those levels. Worries about larger market conditions, including new trade tensions connected to President Donald Trump’s tariff threats, have kept speculative assets under pressure.

Members of Congress continue to create pertinent regulations, while Bitcoin continues to draw institutional capital through exchange-traded funds. However, during times of economic uncertainty, major progress has been impeded by its increasing correlation with equity market patterns.

Schiff has a long history of failed predictions.

Schiff has a long history of making incorrect forecasts. More than a dozen times, in fact. Every time, the advice is the same: sell Bitcoin and invest your money in gold or silver mining stocks instead.

The problem is, his track record isn’t great. Bitcoin has gone on to hit multiple all-time highs despite those warnings, often climbing to levels he once insisted it would never reach.

Still, Schiff argues that Bitcoin has no fundamental value because it isn’t used to build anything, unlike silver. In his view, Bitcoin’s price is driven more by hype and speculation than anything tangible, which is why he believes it could unravel suddenly.

He has compared the rise of Bitcoin to infamous financial bubbles in the past, claiming that when investor sentiment changes, the drop would be rapid and severe.

Currently, Bitcoin is struggling. Institutional purchasing has been inconsistent, retail demand has declined, and uncertainty from trade tariffs to ongoing international conflicts continues to impact the overall picture.

Still, unlike in other downturns, it hasn’t totally collapsed. Although confidence was shaken by the steep decline on October 10, prices swiftly recovered. Many in the crypto community saw this as a sign that the price is still on its way up.

This divide is clear in the reactions to Schiff’s latest post. Silver fans point to the metal’s physical uses as proof of its value, while Bitcoin fans mostly ignore Schiff because of his past mistakes. Some critics even pointed out that Schiff sees a price drop in silver as a chance to buy more, but sees any drop in Bitcoin as proof that it is dying.

Bitcoin is still confined to a small trading range, while silver keeps reaching all-time highs. The way the market responds to impending economic and policy events will determine whether Schiff’s prediction turns out to be accurate or simply another failure.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Market Opportunity
SILVER Logo
SILVER Price(SILVER)
$0.000000000000147
$0.000000000000147$0.000000000000147
-2.64%
USD
SILVER (SILVER) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37