The post Celsius estate alleges TrueUSD firms gambled customer deposits appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In October 2025, the Celsius estate filed a lawsuitThe post Celsius estate alleges TrueUSD firms gambled customer deposits appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In October 2025, the Celsius estate filed a lawsuit

Celsius estate alleges TrueUSD firms gambled customer deposits

In October 2025, the Celsius estate filed a lawsuit against Archblock, TrueCoin, and TrustToken, which all operated TrueUSD (TUSD) as well as other “True” stablecoins before Justin Sun-connected Techteryx took over.

The complaint alleges that the firms that operate the various stablecoins “gambled their customers’ deposits on risky offshore investments with partners who disclaimed any fiduciary duties.”

In its November response, Archblock denied the allegations.

Read more: Justin Sun bailed out $500M stablecoin TUSD, report

However, Techteryx, the Sun-affiliated firm that now operates TrueUSD, has filed lawsuits against First Digital, which allege that First Digital had misappropriated the funds that had been placed with it and invested them in speculative assets.

This accusation was echoed in the SEC lawsuit against TrueUSD that claimed that TUSD’s dollar backing had been sent to “a speculative and risky offshore commodity fund.”

The SEC complaint also claims that two of the firms mentioned in this complaint, TrueCoin and TrustToken, “became aware of redemption problems at the commodity fund” in 2022.

Read more: Control of TrueUSD private keys transferred to Techteryx

Sun has reportedly stepped in with additional liquidity to prevent the stablecoin’s failure.

However, despite this Sun-provided liquidity — which may be limited to only TrueUSD — Celsius still claims that it “has been unable to redeem stablecoins issued by defendants worth approximately USD $12.92 million.”

According to the complaint in March 2023, “Celsius emailed a redemption request to TrustToken, seeking to redeem certain holdings.”

Read more: FTX knew Justin Sun tried to acquire TrueUSD

There was then, apparently, “nearly a month” wait until “Archblock responded.”

Subsequently, in July 2023, “Archblock informed Celsius that GBP, CAD and AUD funds were inaccessible for redemption because Prime Trust…had been placed into receivership in Nevada.”

Prime Trust was not the only TrueCurrency partner who was experiencing problems, as “On March 26, 2024, Alex de Lorraine, the CEO of Archblock, sent an email altering Celsius to ‘potential issue concerning the collateral backing the TGBP stablecoin.’”

De Lorraine added that Archblock “suspects a potential default by an underlying investment fund.”

Read more: What’s up with TrueUSD and the rest of TrustToken’s stablecoins?

Celsius claims this is evidence that “collateral for TGBP held by Celsius were invested with an investment fund and not in cash, cash equivalents or short-term government securities.”

Archblock, in its response, claims to deny that allegation, though it’s unclear how Celsius would be misrepresenting its ability to redeem those tokens.

The TrueCoin website currently includes several paragraphs detailing its legal maneuvers with the Prime Trust bankruptcy related to “foreign currency held by Prime” which TrueCoin claims “were held for the benefit of TrueCoin token holders.”

Protos reached out to Archblock and TrueCoin for comment on this ongoing lawsuit, but neither responded before publication.

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source: https://protos.com/celsius-estate-alleges-trueusd-firms-gambled-customer-deposits/

Market Opportunity
TrueUSD Logo
TrueUSD Price(TUSD)
$0.9996
$0.9996$0.9996
-0.01%
USD
TrueUSD (TUSD) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Pinecone Matches INIBOX: The Ultimate Guide to High-Performance Mining

Pinecone Matches INIBOX: The Ultimate Guide to High-Performance Mining

  Introduction to Pinecone Matches INIBOX (850Mh) We present the definitive guide to the Pinecone Matches INIBOX (850Mh) — a cutting-edge cryptocurrency mining
Share
Techbullion2026/01/22 12:27
Solana Founder Reveals Three Essential Principles To Attract Capital Successfully

Solana Founder Reveals Three Essential Principles To Attract Capital Successfully

The post Solana Founder Reveals Three Essential Principles To Attract Capital Successfully appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto Projects: Solana Founder
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 11:49