Nakamoto shares fell nearly 10% after the company announced a name change from KindlyMD.Nakamoto shares fell nearly 10% after the company announced a name change from KindlyMD.

Bitcoin treasury firm Nakamoto slides nearly 10% after name change announcement

The stocks in Nakamoto plummeted by almost 10% on Wednesday in response to the company’s decision to change its brand from KindlyMD to one that focuses exclusively on Bitcoin reserves. The initial idea was to demonstrate a commitment to long-term storage of digital assets.

The change in its name was made official through a public announcement on Wednesday, in which the firm stated that it would operate under the new name Nakamoto Inc., using the ticker symbol NAKA going forward. At the time of its publication, its stock was down over 7% and was priced at $0.39, according to CNBC market data.

Nakamoto changed its name to focus only on Bitcoin.

Previously known as KindlyMD, Nakamoto started in the healthcare sector, though it later focused on Bitcoin. This development aligned the business with digital assets, as did most other companies in the sector.

Nakamoto was established following a merger of the current activities, allowing the previous activities to continue, while the strategy involves investing in cryptocurrencies.

Currently operating as Kindly LLC, medical services continue despite the change: no closing or sale has occurred. The organization is wholly owned by Nakamoto Inc., operating as an independent entity. 

According to Chief Executive Officer David Bailey, the name change will remove any ambiguity about what the company is trying to build. Nakamoto, as a name, clearly states its intentions rooted firmly in Bitcoin as both the premise and objective. 

This rebranding is part of Nakamoto’s steady increase in its Bitcoin treasury holdings. The company has more than $500 million in Bitcoins, along with investments in other firms focused on Bitcoins but outside the U.S.

Bailey explained that Nakamoto’s long-term plan is to hold up to 5% of the total 21 million Bitcoins, which would make the firm one of the most aggressive corporate investors if achieved.

Nakamoto finds itself in good company among several companies that have adopted the digital asset treasury strategy, even if it lags behind the largest players in the space.

Twenty One Capital, led by Tether and Strike founder Jack Mallers, has also emerged as a significant holder of Bitcoin, second only to Strategy and its founder, Michael Saylor, among companies that hold Bitcoin on their balance sheets.

Investors sold the stock after the rebrand raised concerns.

Contrary to expectations, the market took a downturn following Nakamoto’s announcement of a name change. Investors began selling shares because they didn’t know whether this company could manage not only its conventional business but also its new focus on Bitcoin.

Losses started appearing instead of gains, with more than 7 percent shed in mid-session trading, almost reaching double digits at one point. Questions began to rise about when this would occur, how it would be financed, and what future gains might look like under this new name.

At this point, the company was trading well below its previous high of $25, last reached in May, when it was thrilled about accumulating digital assets.

This recent data influenced how traders viewed conditions, which explains their cautious stance.

A drop of $0.42 in the last quarter, combined with revenue below forecast, sparked scrutiny over how quickly the company might sustain Bitcoin expansion. 

Analysts are closely following Nakamoto’s reaction to changes in Bitcoin’s price and holding reserves for operational and investment purposes. The target analyst price for Nakamoto is around $1.25.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Market Opportunity
ChangeX Logo
ChangeX Price(CHANGE)
$0.00065079
$0.00065079$0.00065079
-35.37%
USD
ChangeX (CHANGE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Pinecone Matches INIBOX: The Ultimate Guide to High-Performance Mining

Pinecone Matches INIBOX: The Ultimate Guide to High-Performance Mining

  Introduction to Pinecone Matches INIBOX (850Mh) We present the definitive guide to the Pinecone Matches INIBOX (850Mh) — a cutting-edge cryptocurrency mining
Share
Techbullion2026/01/22 12:27
Solana Founder Reveals Three Essential Principles To Attract Capital Successfully

Solana Founder Reveals Three Essential Principles To Attract Capital Successfully

The post Solana Founder Reveals Three Essential Principles To Attract Capital Successfully appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto Projects: Solana Founder
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 11:49