The Central Bank of Ireland has fined Coinbase $24.75 million (€21,464,734) for breaching anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) monitoring obligations between 2021 and 2025. Related Reading: Top Crypto Exchange Expands To Latin America With Argentina And Brazil Market Entry Coinbase Europe Fined By Irish Regulator On Thursday, the Central Bank of Ireland announced […]The Central Bank of Ireland has fined Coinbase $24.75 million (€21,464,734) for breaching anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) monitoring obligations between 2021 and 2025. Related Reading: Top Crypto Exchange Expands To Latin America With Argentina And Brazil Market Entry Coinbase Europe Fined By Irish Regulator On Thursday, the Central Bank of Ireland announced […]

Irish Regulator Hits Coinbase With $24.7M Fine For AML Monitoring Failures

2025/11/07 13:00

The Central Bank of Ireland has fined Coinbase $24.75 million (€21,464,734) for breaching anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) monitoring obligations between 2021 and 2025.

Coinbase Europe Fined By Irish Regulator

On Thursday, the Central Bank of Ireland announced its first enforcement action against the crypto sector after fining Coinbase Europe Limited, the European arm of the US exchange, for multiple anti-money laundering monitoring failures over the past four years.

According to the announcement, the Irish regulator and the crypto exchange settled on November 5, 2025, resulting in the $35.3 million (€30.6 million) penalty being reduced to $24.75 million after a 30% settlement scheme discount.

Coinbase was fined for “faults in the configuration of their transaction monitoring system” that resulted in over 30 million transactions not being properly monitored over 12 months. As the Central Bank detailed, the value of these transactions amounted to €176 billion, approximately 31% of all Coinbase Europe transactions conducted in the period when the faults existed.

As a registered Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) in Ireland, the crypto exchange is required to monitor customer transactions and file a Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) with the national Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) and Revenue Commissioners if it suspects that any given transaction is facilitating money laundering or terrorist financing.

Nonetheless, Coinbase’s European arm took almost 3 years to fully complete monitoring of the over 30 million impacted transactions, which led to the reporting of 2,708 STRs to the FIU for analysis and potential investigation. The submitted STRs contained suspicions of serious criminal activities, the statement noted.

Colm Kincaid, Deputy Governor of Consumer and Investor Protection, asserted that “to be effective in combatting financial crime, law enforcement agencies rely on regulated financial institutions to have systems in place to monitor transactions and report suspicions. The failure of such a system within any financial institution creates an opportunity for criminals to evade detection – and criminals will take that opportunity.”

“Where system failures do occur, it is imperative that they are reported to the Central Bank without delay so that appropriate actions can be taken to manage and mitigate the risk,” he concluded.

 Coinbase Called ‘Corruption Factory’

Last week, Coinbase also faced scrutiny in the US, after Senator Chris Murphy accused the crypto exchange of participating in President Donald Trump’s alleged “corruption factory.”

As reported by Bitcoinist, the Democratic Senator claimed that the crypto exchange’s donations to Trump’s presidential campaign were part of a political payoff that allegedly resulted in the dismissal of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s lawsuit against the exchange.

Coinbase’s CLO, Paul Grewal, and CPO, Faryar Shirzad, refuted the claims, affirming that the Senator’s allegations were misinformed. Shirzad argued that the SEC lawsuits against the exchange and multiple other crypto companies “were part of a grotesque pattern of bullying and abuse of power by the previous chair.”

Meanwhile, Grewal asserted that “What was corrupt was allowing us to go public ‘in the public interest’ and then suing us. What was corrupt was what the Third Circuit held was an arbitrary and capricious denial of our request to get basic rules for crypto.”

It’s worth noting that Coinbase has openly criticized the previous administration’s crypto crackdown, asking for a more welcoming approach and clear regulations. Earlier this year, the exchange filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to seek information on the SEC’s spending on enforcement actions against crypto firms during the Biden Administration.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

OCC Confirms Banks Can Facilitate No-Risk Crypto Transactions

OCC Confirms Banks Can Facilitate No-Risk Crypto Transactions

The post OCC Confirms Banks Can Facilitate No-Risk Crypto Transactions appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. national banks have been passed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to enable their customers perform instant crypto trades with no risk. This decision has cleared a significant obstacle in the way of banks that desire to be part of the expanding digital assets market. Banks Receive Clarity on Crypto Trading Authority  Interpretive Letter 1188 states that a bank can be an intermediary in crypto transactions without having digital assets in its possession. The OCC clarified that one client may sell a crypto asset to one bank and that bank will sell the asset to the other client at the same time. Since the two trades take place virtually at the same time the bank does not have an exposure to the market. The license provides banks with a regulated structure to provide crypto trading services. This is in line with preceding actions like enabling banks to hold major crypto assets. Another explanation that OCC provides is that the role of the bank is not to trade digital assets. Instead, the only responsibility of the bank is linking the sellers and the buyers. OCC Reinforces Bank’s Crypto Oversight The regulator mentioned that such transactions carry a limited amount of settlement risk. The decision is an update of a previous guidance that permitted crypto custody and some stablecoin transactions. The latest clarification strengthens the same allowances but indicates continued regulation of responsible crypto services in the banking space. With this, the banks are now enabled to provide customers with a secure means of accessing digital assets in compliance with federal regulations. The OCC stressed that institutions need to continue having robust risk controls, such as cybersecurity controls and compliance programs. Hence, all their operations can be safe and in line with current rules. How Institutions Might…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/10 07:46