Civil society groups are concerned that a ‘meaningful’ consultation process has not yet taken place despite the delay in submission of the updated NDC to the United NationsCivil society groups are concerned that a ‘meaningful’ consultation process has not yet taken place despite the delay in submission of the updated NDC to the United Nations

Corruption a threat to Philippines’ higher climate ambition – groups

2025/12/04 11:45

MANILA, Philippines – As the Philippine government proposes higher climate targets, groups warn that corruption can threaten the country’s capacity to implement programs needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The Philippines is proposing an unconditional target of between 10% to 20% — much higher than the 2.71% stated in the country’s current Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC).

The new target was presented to civil society groups on Wednesday, December 3, in a high-level plenary session. Even before the annual climate talks in Brazil took place, groups Rappler talked to had already complained about the lack of consultations on the new NDC.

“With a likely higher cost of implementation for the updated NDC to match the higher ambition, there is simply no room for any errors, especially those caused by corruption or inaction,” Aksyon Klima Pilipinas national coordinator John Leo Algo said in a statement Wednesday.

Countries like the Philippines that are party to the Paris Agreement are required to submit NDCs, or pledges on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Back in 2021, the Philippines pledged to reduce carbon emissions by 75% — 2.71% is unconditional and 72.29% is conditional. Parties are supposed to submit to the United Nations their revised targets early 2025.

Raising unconditional targets would mean mobilizing more national resources. Conditional targets, meanwhile, are reliant on the support that the Philippines will get from the international community.

“Any commitment like the NDC is only as good as its implementation,” said Algo.

Despite the Philippines’ delayed timeline in submission, think-tank Center for Energy, Ecology, and Development (CEED) said the government has not made use of the time to have a “meaningful” consultation process. CEED was one of the groups present at the consultation arranged by the Philippine government on Wednesday.

CEED is concerned that the 2025 NDC is slated for submission to the Office of the President by December without providing civil society the full draft as well as the analyses behind the new targets.

“Government agencies must be transparent and genuinely inclusive if we are to have an NDC that is truly backed by the people,” said CEED deputy executive director Avril de Torres.

AKP pointed out that the government agencies making the 2025 NDC cannot expect “meaningful feedback” if they are not given enough time to examine the new pledges.

The Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Climate Change Commission lead this process while the Department of Economy, Planning, and Development and the Department of Finance act as oversight agencies.

“In this regard, the government comes up short in ensuring an inclusive, bottom-up approach to this crucial part of finalizing the NDC,” Algo said.

So far, 122 parties have submitted their new NDCs to the United Nations. Parties are supposed to submit a revised NDC every five years, showing a progression in climate ambition. – Rappler.com

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0005346
$0.0005346$0.0005346
-3.88%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

US Congress Proposes AI Export Oversight Bill

US Congress Proposes AI Export Oversight Bill

US Congress introduces bipartisan bill for AI chip export oversight, affecting Nvidia and Trump policies.
Share
bitcoininfonews2026/01/22 21:02
Ubisoft (UBI) Stock: Restructuring Efforts and Game Cancellations Prompt 33% Dip

Ubisoft (UBI) Stock: Restructuring Efforts and Game Cancellations Prompt 33% Dip

TLDR Ubisoft’s stock dropped 33% following organizational changes and the cancellation of six games. The company plans to shut down studios in Halifax and Stockholm
Share
Blockonomi2026/01/22 20:50
The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets

The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets

The post The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Researchers found $40 million in “risk-free” profits from mispriced markets on Polymarket in one year. Prices on some markets didn’t add up to 100%, letting traders lock in guaranteed gains. The same inefficiencies likely exist on other platforms like Myriad and Kalshi, though arbitrageurs help correct them. A new academic paper suggests there’s been a steady stream of “free money” lying around on Polymarket—and smart traders have been scooping it up. The paper, Unravelling the Probabilistic Forest: Arbitrage in Prediction Markets, is the most detailed look yet at how mispricing creeps into crypto’s most popular prediction platform. The researchers combed through a year of data, from April 2024 to April 2025, and found thousands of instances where market prices simply didn’t add up. In some cases, the prices of “Yes” and “No” shares in a single market didn’t sum to one dollar as they theoretically should, creating a risk-free profit for anyone quick enough to pounce.  In other cases, the mispricing was more subtle, involving logically related markets. For example, a market on “Trump wins the presidency” might trade at very different odds than “Republican wins the presidency,” even though those outcomes are tightly linked. By buying and selling combinations of these contracts, a savvy trader could lock in a profit no matter what happens. The researchers estimate more than $40 million in profits have already been pulled from the system by arbitrageurs, traders who specialize in sniffing out and exploiting these kinds of inconsistencies. Far from being a theoretical curiosity, this is a live and lucrative business model. Is this pattern true across all prediction markets? What’s striking is how common these opportunities are. The study found more than 7,000 markets with measurable mispricing, many in highly liquid, closely watched contracts. “Prediction markets are often treated…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 14:34