The post Grand Jury Declines Indictment Against Letitia James appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline An indictment against New York Attorney General Letitia James was declined by a grand jury Thursday in a mortgage fraud case against her, marking the second Trump administration-led indictment James has avoided within the last two weeks. New York Attorney General Letitia James, speaks outside the United States District Court on Oct. 24 in Norfolk, Virginia. Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. Key Facts The indictment was declined by a grand jury in Norfolk, Virginia. The Justice Department sought to indict James after its first indictment against James was thrown out in November, as U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie ruled U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, who signed the indictment, was not validly appointed. Prosecutors can still seek a third indictment against James, who has denied wrongdoing. What We Don’t Know: If the DOJ will also try to reindict former FBI Director James Comey, whose charges for allegedly lying to Congress were also thrown out due to Halligan’s appointment being invalid. While bringing charges against James was more straightforward, Comey’s case is more complicated, as the statute of limitations for his comments to Congress expired in September. Federal law does allow prosecutors to bring new charges within six months of charges being dismissed despite the statute of limitations—or 60 days after any appeals process ends—but it’s unclear if that applies here. Currie suggested in a footnote to her ruling that since the government’s indictment against Comey was never valid in the first place, since Halligan wasn’t a valid prosecutor, then the six-month rule doesn’t apply, and the charges can’t be brought again. The judge’s comments aren’t binding, however, so the Trump administration could still try to bring charges again and see how it plays out in court. Read More Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/12/04/new-york-attorney-general-letitia-james-avoids-new-indictment-from-trump-administration/The post Grand Jury Declines Indictment Against Letitia James appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline An indictment against New York Attorney General Letitia James was declined by a grand jury Thursday in a mortgage fraud case against her, marking the second Trump administration-led indictment James has avoided within the last two weeks. New York Attorney General Letitia James, speaks outside the United States District Court on Oct. 24 in Norfolk, Virginia. Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. Key Facts The indictment was declined by a grand jury in Norfolk, Virginia. The Justice Department sought to indict James after its first indictment against James was thrown out in November, as U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie ruled U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, who signed the indictment, was not validly appointed. Prosecutors can still seek a third indictment against James, who has denied wrongdoing. What We Don’t Know: If the DOJ will also try to reindict former FBI Director James Comey, whose charges for allegedly lying to Congress were also thrown out due to Halligan’s appointment being invalid. While bringing charges against James was more straightforward, Comey’s case is more complicated, as the statute of limitations for his comments to Congress expired in September. Federal law does allow prosecutors to bring new charges within six months of charges being dismissed despite the statute of limitations—or 60 days after any appeals process ends—but it’s unclear if that applies here. Currie suggested in a footnote to her ruling that since the government’s indictment against Comey was never valid in the first place, since Halligan wasn’t a valid prosecutor, then the six-month rule doesn’t apply, and the charges can’t be brought again. The judge’s comments aren’t binding, however, so the Trump administration could still try to bring charges again and see how it plays out in court. Read More Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/12/04/new-york-attorney-general-letitia-james-avoids-new-indictment-from-trump-administration/

Grand Jury Declines Indictment Against Letitia James

2025/12/05 07:45

Topline

An indictment against New York Attorney General Letitia James was declined by a grand jury Thursday in a mortgage fraud case against her, marking the second Trump administration-led indictment James has avoided within the last two weeks.

New York Attorney General Letitia James, speaks outside the United States District Court on Oct. 24 in Norfolk, Virginia.

Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

Key Facts

The indictment was declined by a grand jury in Norfolk, Virginia.

The Justice Department sought to indict James after its first indictment against James was thrown out in November, as U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie ruled U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, who signed the indictment, was not validly appointed.

Prosecutors can still seek a third indictment against James, who has denied wrongdoing.

What We Don’t Know:

If the DOJ will also try to reindict former FBI Director James Comey, whose charges for allegedly lying to Congress were also thrown out due to Halligan’s appointment being invalid. While bringing charges against James was more straightforward, Comey’s case is more complicated, as the statute of limitations for his comments to Congress expired in September. Federal law does allow prosecutors to bring new charges within six months of charges being dismissed despite the statute of limitations—or 60 days after any appeals process ends—but it’s unclear if that applies here. Currie suggested in a footnote to her ruling that since the government’s indictment against Comey was never valid in the first place, since Halligan wasn’t a valid prosecutor, then the six-month rule doesn’t apply, and the charges can’t be brought again. The judge’s comments aren’t binding, however, so the Trump administration could still try to bring charges again and see how it plays out in court.

Read More

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2025/12/04/new-york-attorney-general-letitia-james-avoids-new-indictment-from-trump-administration/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37