The post Binance Alpha’s Piggycell faces scrutiny after brutal crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Piggycell’s PIGGY token crashed after a sudden mint‑and‑dump, raising hard questions over token controls, smart‑contract design and Binance Alpha’s listing safeguards. Summary Large, sudden PIGGY mint linked to one wallet preceded a violent intraday price collapse.​ Piggycell markets itself as a Korean DePIN power‑bank network tokenized via PIGGY on Binance Alpha.​ Lack of immediate, detailed disclosure from Piggycell or Binance fuels rug‑pull accusations and trust concerns. Piggycell’s PIGGY (PIGGY) token appears to have suffered a violent intraday collapse after a sudden spike in freshly minted tokens hit the market, triggering renewed questions over token controls and Binance’s Alpha listing standards. Onchain sleuths are now scrutinizing a single wallet that allegedly minted and dumped millions of dollars’ worth of PIGGY within minutes.​ $PIGGY RUG Over the last 10 minutes, nearly $4M worth of $PIGGY was freshly minted – and immediately dumped on the market The token collapsed -90% instantly Minting wallet:0x942f360d8a265aFcfDFa564429550DD755F96896 pic.twitter.com/5SI2NmezQO — onchainschool.pro (@how2onchain) December 5, 2025 What happened to PIGGY According to on-chain monitoring accounts, a wallet identified as 0x942f360d8a265aFcfDFa564429550DD755F96896 minted a large batch of new PIGGY tokens and rapidly sold them into the market, coinciding with a reported intraday drawdown of around 90%. Price trackers show PIGGY trading around the 0.4 dollar range recently, with sharp volatility and elevated volumes consistent with forced selling and panic exits.​ At the time of writing, there is no public statement from Piggycell or Binance Alpha addressing the specific minting wallet or explaining whether the issuance was part of a vesting schedule, treasury action, or an exploit. Without that disclosure, the incident has understandably been labeled a potential “rug” by traders watching their positions evaporate in real time.​ Who is Piggycell Piggycell is marketed as a Korean power‑bank sharing network that has been tokenized into a DePIN and real‑world asset (RWA) play… The post Binance Alpha’s Piggycell faces scrutiny after brutal crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Piggycell’s PIGGY token crashed after a sudden mint‑and‑dump, raising hard questions over token controls, smart‑contract design and Binance Alpha’s listing safeguards. Summary Large, sudden PIGGY mint linked to one wallet preceded a violent intraday price collapse.​ Piggycell markets itself as a Korean DePIN power‑bank network tokenized via PIGGY on Binance Alpha.​ Lack of immediate, detailed disclosure from Piggycell or Binance fuels rug‑pull accusations and trust concerns. Piggycell’s PIGGY (PIGGY) token appears to have suffered a violent intraday collapse after a sudden spike in freshly minted tokens hit the market, triggering renewed questions over token controls and Binance’s Alpha listing standards. Onchain sleuths are now scrutinizing a single wallet that allegedly minted and dumped millions of dollars’ worth of PIGGY within minutes.​ $PIGGY RUG Over the last 10 minutes, nearly $4M worth of $PIGGY was freshly minted – and immediately dumped on the market The token collapsed -90% instantly Minting wallet:0x942f360d8a265aFcfDFa564429550DD755F96896 pic.twitter.com/5SI2NmezQO — onchainschool.pro (@how2onchain) December 5, 2025 What happened to PIGGY According to on-chain monitoring accounts, a wallet identified as 0x942f360d8a265aFcfDFa564429550DD755F96896 minted a large batch of new PIGGY tokens and rapidly sold them into the market, coinciding with a reported intraday drawdown of around 90%. Price trackers show PIGGY trading around the 0.4 dollar range recently, with sharp volatility and elevated volumes consistent with forced selling and panic exits.​ At the time of writing, there is no public statement from Piggycell or Binance Alpha addressing the specific minting wallet or explaining whether the issuance was part of a vesting schedule, treasury action, or an exploit. Without that disclosure, the incident has understandably been labeled a potential “rug” by traders watching their positions evaporate in real time.​ Who is Piggycell Piggycell is marketed as a Korean power‑bank sharing network that has been tokenized into a DePIN and real‑world asset (RWA) play…

Binance Alpha’s Piggycell faces scrutiny after brutal crash

2025/12/05 21:32

Piggycell’s PIGGY token crashed after a sudden mint‑and‑dump, raising hard questions over token controls, smart‑contract design and Binance Alpha’s listing safeguards.

Summary

  • Large, sudden PIGGY mint linked to one wallet preceded a violent intraday price collapse.​
  • Piggycell markets itself as a Korean DePIN power‑bank network tokenized via PIGGY on Binance Alpha.​
  • Lack of immediate, detailed disclosure from Piggycell or Binance fuels rug‑pull accusations and trust concerns.

Piggycell’s PIGGY (PIGGY) token appears to have suffered a violent intraday collapse after a sudden spike in freshly minted tokens hit the market, triggering renewed questions over token controls and Binance’s Alpha listing standards. Onchain sleuths are now scrutinizing a single wallet that allegedly minted and dumped millions of dollars’ worth of PIGGY within minutes.​

What happened to PIGGY

According to on-chain monitoring accounts, a wallet identified as 0x942f360d8a265aFcfDFa564429550DD755F96896 minted a large batch of new PIGGY tokens and rapidly sold them into the market, coinciding with a reported intraday drawdown of around 90%. Price trackers show PIGGY trading around the 0.4 dollar range recently, with sharp volatility and elevated volumes consistent with forced selling and panic exits.​

At the time of writing, there is no public statement from Piggycell or Binance Alpha addressing the specific minting wallet or explaining whether the issuance was part of a vesting schedule, treasury action, or an exploit. Without that disclosure, the incident has understandably been labeled a potential “rug” by traders watching their positions evaporate in real time.​

Who is Piggycell

Piggycell is marketed as a Korean power‑bank sharing network that has been tokenized into a DePIN and real‑world asset (RWA) play under the PIGGY ticker. The project’s pitch is simple: users rent portable power banks from a physical network of stations, while token holders earn incentives tied to real-world device usage and uptime.​

PIGGY launched through Binance Alpha in late October, with a 100 million token supply split across BNB Chain and ICP, and an airdrop campaign designed to funnel early users via Alpha Points. Binance promoted Piggycell as a “top power bank network turned RWA & DePIN protocol,” underlining the platform’s desire to court physical‑infrastructure narratives.​

Rug pull, exploit, or mismanaged tokenomics?

The pattern desccribed by traders—sudden mint, aggressive dumping, vertical price collapse—is textbook rug‑pull or insider exit behavior, even if intent is not yet proven. Rug pulls typically rely either on hidden mint functions or concentrated insider holdings that can be offloaded onto retail without warning, leaving the market illiquid and shell‑shocked.

Source: https://crypto.news/binance-alphas-piggycell-faces-scrutiny-after-brutal-crash/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37