The post EU Fines X $140M for Misleading Verified Badges and Data Denial appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X’s blue checkmark system was judged a deceptive design, because it misleads users about account authenticity The social media platform didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules X now has 60 working days to present a remediation plan for the blue check issue, and 90 days to address ad transparency and data access shortcomings The European Commission fined Elon Musk’s social network X €120 million (roughly $140 million) for violations of the Digital Services Act (DSA), which represents the first major enforcement under the regulation. The case centers on X’s paid blue check verification system, missing transparency around political and commercial ads, and barriers that researchers faced when they tried to study public posts. Under the DSA, regulators want people in Europe to see who paid for content, why they see it, and how platforms handle risks such as disinformation and targeted manipulation. Related: ‘Impossible to Fake Energy’: Musk Doubles Down on Bitcoin’s Intrinsic Value How X misled users with Blue Checks According to the Commission, there were several breaches involved: X’s blue checkmark (verification badge) system, where users can pay for verified” status, was judged a deceptive design because it misleads users about account authenticity. X didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules. Key details like who bought an ad, what it said, and who it was shown to were often missing or hard to find. Researchers were denied adequate access to public data, such as metrics and content data. The platform’s interface and terms of service were found to impose unnecessary barriers that hindered legitimate data collection and analysis of public information. The fine is broken down into three segments: approximately €45 million for checkmark-related deception, €35 million for advertising transparency failures,… The post EU Fines X $140M for Misleading Verified Badges and Data Denial appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. X’s blue checkmark system was judged a deceptive design, because it misleads users about account authenticity The social media platform didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules X now has 60 working days to present a remediation plan for the blue check issue, and 90 days to address ad transparency and data access shortcomings The European Commission fined Elon Musk’s social network X €120 million (roughly $140 million) for violations of the Digital Services Act (DSA), which represents the first major enforcement under the regulation. The case centers on X’s paid blue check verification system, missing transparency around political and commercial ads, and barriers that researchers faced when they tried to study public posts. Under the DSA, regulators want people in Europe to see who paid for content, why they see it, and how platforms handle risks such as disinformation and targeted manipulation. Related: ‘Impossible to Fake Energy’: Musk Doubles Down on Bitcoin’s Intrinsic Value How X misled users with Blue Checks According to the Commission, there were several breaches involved: X’s blue checkmark (verification badge) system, where users can pay for verified” status, was judged a deceptive design because it misleads users about account authenticity. X didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules. Key details like who bought an ad, what it said, and who it was shown to were often missing or hard to find. Researchers were denied adequate access to public data, such as metrics and content data. The platform’s interface and terms of service were found to impose unnecessary barriers that hindered legitimate data collection and analysis of public information. The fine is broken down into three segments: approximately €45 million for checkmark-related deception, €35 million for advertising transparency failures,…

EU Fines X $140M for Misleading Verified Badges and Data Denial

2025/12/06 06:53
  • X’s blue checkmark system was judged a deceptive design, because it misleads users about account authenticity
  • The social media platform didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules
  • X now has 60 working days to present a remediation plan for the blue check issue, and 90 days to address ad transparency and data access shortcomings

The European Commission fined Elon Musk’s social network X €120 million (roughly $140 million) for violations of the Digital Services Act (DSA), which represents the first major enforcement under the regulation.

The case centers on X’s paid blue check verification system, missing transparency around political and commercial ads, and barriers that researchers faced when they tried to study public posts. Under the DSA, regulators want people in Europe to see who paid for content, why they see it, and how platforms handle risks such as disinformation and targeted manipulation.

Related: ‘Impossible to Fake Energy’: Musk Doubles Down on Bitcoin’s Intrinsic Value

How X misled users with Blue Checks

According to the Commission, there were several breaches involved:

  • X’s blue checkmark (verification badge) system, where users can pay for verified” status, was judged a deceptive design because it misleads users about account authenticity.
  • X didn’t create the required clear, public log of ads, as mandated by new EU rules. Key details like who bought an ad, what it said, and who it was shown to were often missing or hard to find.
  • Researchers were denied adequate access to public data, such as metrics and content data. The platform’s interface and terms of service were found to impose unnecessary barriers that hindered legitimate data collection and analysis of public information.

The fine is broken down into three segments: approximately €45 million for checkmark-related deception, €35 million for advertising transparency failures, and €40 million for data access violations.

Under the DSA, penalties could have reached up to 6% of global revenue, meaning this is more of a proportionate penalty rather than a maximal one.

Henna Virkkunen, the European Commission’s Executive Vice President for tech regulation, said the fine was appropriate and not about censorship. She clarified that the purpose is not to censor but to ensure companies are more open and users are safer online.

X has yet to respond

For X, the blue check model represented a way to monetize. The social media platform now has 60 working days to present a remediation plan for the blue check issue, and 90 days to address ad transparency and data access shortcomings. If it fails, higher fines or further sanctions under DSA are possible.

Interestingly, a similar situation happened with TikTok, where the company recently avoided a fine by committing to improve its ad transparency and compliance.

All eyes are now on whether X will follow the EU’s instructions and, if so, how fast. What the company does next will show if it plans to play by the new rules or fight against them.

Related: Europe’s 10 Largest Banks Form ‘Qivalis’ to Break US Dollar’s 99% Grip on Stablecoin Market

Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

Source: https://coinedition.com/eu-fines-musk-x-140m-for-misleading-verified-badges-and-data-denial/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37