South Korea’s FSC is considering rules that would force crypto exchanges to reimburse customers for losses from hacks or system failures, even when the exchange isn’t at fault. The post South Korea Moves to Impose Bank-Level ‘No-Fault’ Liability on Crypto Exchanges appeared first on Crypto News Australia.South Korea’s FSC is considering rules that would force crypto exchanges to reimburse customers for losses from hacks or system failures, even when the exchange isn’t at fault. The post South Korea Moves to Impose Bank-Level ‘No-Fault’ Liability on Crypto Exchanges appeared first on Crypto News Australia.

South Korea Moves to Impose Bank-Level ‘No-Fault’ Liability on Crypto Exchanges

2025/12/08 13:19
  • South Korea will impose “no-fault” liability on major crypto exchanges, forcing them to compensate customers for losses from hacks and system failures.
  • This new rule sets the compensation standard for exchanges equivalent to that of traditional banks.
  • Lawmakers are planning tougher sanctions, which could include fines up to 3% of an exchange’s annual revenue.

South Korea plans to make major crypto exchanges compensate customers for hacks and outages in the same way banks must do.

According to a report from the Korea Times, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) is drafting rules that would force exchanges to reimburse users for losses from hacking or system failures even when the platform is not directly at fault. 

This “no-fault” rule, the report reads, now applies only to banks and electronic payment firms, leaving a gap for digital asset platforms.

Related: Citadel’s Tokenised-Stock Warning Puts DeFi in the Crosshairs of Federal Rulemaking

Regulators Eyeing Korean Exchanges

The recent fallout and breaches from high-profile crypto exchanges, based in SK and worldwide, have drawn scrutiny and concern from regulators. 

Data from the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) show the five largest exchanges, Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone, Korbit and Gopax, reported 20 system failures from 2023 through September this year. More than 900 customers lost about 5 billion won in total, and Upbit accounted for six incidents, over 600 affected users and 3 billion won in losses (AU$3.05M).

The immediate catalyst was a 27 Nov. exploit at Upbit, where Solana-based tokens worth 44.5 billion won, or about US$30.1 million (AU$46.05 million), were moved to external wallets in under an hour, as Crypto News Australia reported.  

Under current law, authorities cannot order user compensation, and the exchange has faced limited penalties.

Higher Standards

Lawmakers are now considering higher standards for IT security, systems and staffing, plus tougher sanctions. One proposal would allow fines of up to 3% of an exchange’s annual revenue for hacking cases, replacing the current 5 billion won ceiling.

The Upbit case has also raised concerns over delayed reporting. The hack was detected around 5 a.m. but not reported to the FSS until 10:58 a.m., after a planned merger between Upbit operator Dunamu and Naver Financial closed. 

FSS Governor Lee Chan-jin said the hack “is not something we can overlook”, but admitted that current oversight rules limit the agency’s ability to impose tough penalties

Related: Why MSCI’s Pending Decision Isn’t the Real Risk for MicroStrategy — or Bitcoin

The post South Korea Moves to Impose Bank-Level ‘No-Fault’ Liability on Crypto Exchanges appeared first on Crypto News Australia.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council

The post Best Crypto to Buy as Saylor & Crypto Execs Meet in US Treasury Council appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Michael Saylor and a group of crypto executives met in Washington, D.C. yesterday to push for the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill (the BITCOIN Act), which would see the U.S. acquire up to 1M $BTC over five years. With Bitcoin being positioned yet again as a cornerstone of national monetary policy, many investors are turning their eyes to projects that lean into this narrative – altcoins, meme coins, and presales that could ride on the same wave. Read on for three of the best crypto projects that seem especially well‐suited to benefit from this macro shift:  Bitcoin Hyper, Best Wallet Token, and Remittix. These projects stand out for having a strong use case and high adoption potential, especially given the push for a U.S. Bitcoin reserve.   Why the Bitcoin Reserve Bill Matters for Crypto Markets The strategic Bitcoin Reserve Bill could mark a turning point for the U.S. approach to digital assets. The proposal would see America build a long-term Bitcoin reserve by acquiring up to one million $BTC over five years. To make this happen, lawmakers are exploring creative funding methods such as revaluing old gold certificates. The plan also leans on confiscated Bitcoin already held by the government, worth an estimated $15–20B. This isn’t just a headline for policy wonks. It signals that Bitcoin is moving from the margins into the core of financial strategy. Industry figures like Michael Saylor, Senator Cynthia Lummis, and Marathon Digital’s Fred Thiel are all backing the bill. They see Bitcoin not just as an investment, but as a hedge against systemic risks. For the wider crypto market, this opens the door for projects tied to Bitcoin and the infrastructure that supports it. 1. Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER) – Turning Bitcoin Into More Than Just Digital Gold The U.S. may soon treat Bitcoin as…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:27
The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters

The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters

The post The Future of Secure Messaging: Why Decentralization Matters appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. From encrypted chats to decentralized messaging Encrypted messengers are having a second wave. Apps like WhatsApp, iMessage and Signal made end-to-end encryption (E2EE) a default expectation. But most still hinge on phone numbers, centralized servers and a lot of metadata, such as who you talk to, when, from which IP and on which device. That is what Vitalik Buterin is aiming at in his recent X post and donation. He argues the next steps for secure messaging are permissionless account creation with no phone numbers or Know Your Customer (KYC) and much stronger metadata privacy. In that context he highlighted Session and SimpleX and sent 128 Ether (ETH) to each to keep pushing in that direction. Session is a good case study because it tries to combine E2E encryption with decentralization. There is no central message server, traffic is routed through onion paths, and user IDs are keys instead of phone numbers. Did you know? Forty-three percent of people who use public WiFi report experiencing a data breach, with man-in-the-middle attacks and packet sniffing against unencrypted traffic among the most common causes. How Session stores your messages Session is built around public key identities. When you sign up, the app generates a keypair locally and derives a Session ID from it with no phone number or email required. Messages travel through a network of service nodes using onion routing so that no single node can see both the sender and the recipient. (You can see your message’s node path in the settings.) For asynchronous delivery when you are offline, messages are stored in small groups of nodes called “swarms.” Each Session ID is mapped to a specific swarm, and your messages are stored there encrypted until your client fetches them. Historically, messages had a default time-to-live of about two weeks…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 14:40