Brazil’s Central Bank defines new 2026 operational rules for all virtual asset service providers (VASPs). New VASPs must meet traditional finance standards for governance, compliance, and client protection. The Central Bank of Brazil (BCB) has solidified its regulatory framework for crypto assets with the publication of three resolutions. These rules, which will take effect on [...]]]>Brazil’s Central Bank defines new 2026 operational rules for all virtual asset service providers (VASPs). New VASPs must meet traditional finance standards for governance, compliance, and client protection. The Central Bank of Brazil (BCB) has solidified its regulatory framework for crypto assets with the publication of three resolutions. These rules, which will take effect on [...]]]>

Brazil’s Central Bank Greenlights Full Crypto Framework: Here’s the 2026 VASP Launch Date

  • Brazil’s Central Bank defines new 2026 operational rules for all virtual asset service providers (VASPs).
  • New VASPs must meet traditional finance standards for governance, compliance, and client protection.

The Central Bank of Brazil (BCB) has solidified its regulatory framework for crypto assets with the publication of three resolutions. These rules, which will take effect on June 2, 2026, detail the conditions for operating in the sector and assign a specific classification to stablecoins, integrating their use into the framework for international exchange.

Resolutions BCB nº 519, 520, and 521 form the foundation of the new supervisory scheme. Resolution nº 519 defines the figure of the Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) and establishes operational requirements.

These institutions, whether traditional financial entities or companies created exclusively for this purpose, must comply with rules for governance, internal control, and procedures against money laundering and terrorist financing. Their operation as intermediaries, custodians, or brokers requires a guarantee of transparency and client protection.

The authorization process for these providers is detailed in Resolution nº 520. This norm updates the criteria applicable to financial segments and sets deadlines for existing companies in the sector to adapt to the Central Bank’s requirements.

The Direct Impact on Stablecoins and International Transactions

Resolution nº 521 creates a substantial change by classifying operations with virtual assets as part of the foreign exchange and international capital markets. Activities such as international payments, transfers to self-custodied wallets, and conversions between fiat currencies and crypto assets fall under this category. In practice, transactions with stablecoins like USDT, USDC, BRZ, and BRLV are equated to traditional foreign exchange operations.

This measure means that international payments or remittances made with stablecoins are subject to the same limits and identification requirements. The rule sets an operational cap of 100,000 dollars per transaction when the counterparty is not a registered financial institution. Companies must implement processes to verify the origin and destination of funds, in addition to reporting data to the Central Bank.

A BCB executive, Gilneu, specified that stablecoins with algorithmic collateral control will not be accepted, citing previous cases where these assets did not prove functional.

The publication of these resolutions represents the final stage of a process that began with Law nº 14,478/2022 and continued with Decree nº 11,563/2023, which designated the Central Bank as the sector’s authority. The public consultations numbered 97/2023, 109/2024, 110/2024, and 111/2024 have now resulted in regulation with concrete deadlines and obligations.

]]>
Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.0384
$0.0384$0.0384
+2.37%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Let insiders trade – Blockworks

Let insiders trade – Blockworks

The post Let insiders trade – Blockworks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. This is a segment from The Breakdown newsletter. To read more editions, subscribe ​​“The most valuable commodity I know of is information.” — Gordon Gekko, Wall Street Ten months ago, FBI agents raided Shayne Coplan’s Manhattan apartment, ostensibly in search of evidence that the prediction market he founded, Polymarket, had illegally allowed US residents to place bets on the US election. Two weeks ago, the CFTC gave Polymarket the green light to allow those very same US residents to place bets on whatever they like. This is quite the turn of events — and it’s not just about elections or politics. With its US government seal of approval in hand, Polymarket is reportedly raising capital at a valuation of $9 billion — a reflection of the growing belief that prediction markets will be used for much more than betting on elections once every four years. Instead, proponents say prediction markets can provide a real service to the world by providing it with better information about nearly everything. I think they might, too — but only if insiders are free to participate. Yesterday, for example, Polymarket announced new betting markets on company earnings reports, with a promise that it would improve the information that investors have to work with.  Instead of waiting three months to find out how a company is faring, investors could simply watch the odds on Polymarket.  If the probability of an earnings beat is rising, for example, investors would know at a glance that things are going well. But that will only happen if enough of the people betting actually know how things are going. Relying on the wisdom of crowds to magically discern how a business is doing won’t add much incremental knowledge to the world; everyone’s guesses are unlikely to average out to the truth. If…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:16
U Mobile and IGB Collaborate on Malaysia’s 5G Indoor Networks

U Mobile and IGB Collaborate on Malaysia’s 5G Indoor Networks

U Mobile partners with IGB Berhad for 5G indoor network deployment across 20 Malaysian properties.
Share
bitcoininfonews2025/12/21 20:20