The post Binance Alpha’s Piggycell faces scrutiny after brutal crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Piggycell’s PIGGY token crashed after a sudden mint‑and‑dump, raising hard questions over token controls, smart‑contract design and Binance Alpha’s listing safeguards. Summary Large, sudden PIGGY mint linked to one wallet preceded a violent intraday price collapse.​ Piggycell markets itself as a Korean DePIN power‑bank network tokenized via PIGGY on Binance Alpha.​ Lack of immediate, detailed disclosure from Piggycell or Binance fuels rug‑pull accusations and trust concerns. Piggycell’s PIGGY (PIGGY) token appears to have suffered a violent intraday collapse after a sudden spike in freshly minted tokens hit the market, triggering renewed questions over token controls and Binance’s Alpha listing standards. Onchain sleuths are now scrutinizing a single wallet that allegedly minted and dumped millions of dollars’ worth of PIGGY within minutes.​ $PIGGY RUG Over the last 10 minutes, nearly $4M worth of $PIGGY was freshly minted – and immediately dumped on the market The token collapsed -90% instantly Minting wallet:0x942f360d8a265aFcfDFa564429550DD755F96896 pic.twitter.com/5SI2NmezQO — onchainschool.pro (@how2onchain) December 5, 2025 What happened to PIGGY According to on-chain monitoring accounts, a wallet identified as 0x942f360d8a265aFcfDFa564429550DD755F96896 minted a large batch of new PIGGY tokens and rapidly sold them into the market, coinciding with a reported intraday drawdown of around 90%. Price trackers show PIGGY trading around the 0.4 dollar range recently, with sharp volatility and elevated volumes consistent with forced selling and panic exits.​ At the time of writing, there is no public statement from Piggycell or Binance Alpha addressing the specific minting wallet or explaining whether the issuance was part of a vesting schedule, treasury action, or an exploit. Without that disclosure, the incident has understandably been labeled a potential “rug” by traders watching their positions evaporate in real time.​ Who is Piggycell Piggycell is marketed as a Korean power‑bank sharing network that has been tokenized into a DePIN and real‑world asset (RWA) play… The post Binance Alpha’s Piggycell faces scrutiny after brutal crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Piggycell’s PIGGY token crashed after a sudden mint‑and‑dump, raising hard questions over token controls, smart‑contract design and Binance Alpha’s listing safeguards. Summary Large, sudden PIGGY mint linked to one wallet preceded a violent intraday price collapse.​ Piggycell markets itself as a Korean DePIN power‑bank network tokenized via PIGGY on Binance Alpha.​ Lack of immediate, detailed disclosure from Piggycell or Binance fuels rug‑pull accusations and trust concerns. Piggycell’s PIGGY (PIGGY) token appears to have suffered a violent intraday collapse after a sudden spike in freshly minted tokens hit the market, triggering renewed questions over token controls and Binance’s Alpha listing standards. Onchain sleuths are now scrutinizing a single wallet that allegedly minted and dumped millions of dollars’ worth of PIGGY within minutes.​ $PIGGY RUG Over the last 10 minutes, nearly $4M worth of $PIGGY was freshly minted – and immediately dumped on the market The token collapsed -90% instantly Minting wallet:0x942f360d8a265aFcfDFa564429550DD755F96896 pic.twitter.com/5SI2NmezQO — onchainschool.pro (@how2onchain) December 5, 2025 What happened to PIGGY According to on-chain monitoring accounts, a wallet identified as 0x942f360d8a265aFcfDFa564429550DD755F96896 minted a large batch of new PIGGY tokens and rapidly sold them into the market, coinciding with a reported intraday drawdown of around 90%. Price trackers show PIGGY trading around the 0.4 dollar range recently, with sharp volatility and elevated volumes consistent with forced selling and panic exits.​ At the time of writing, there is no public statement from Piggycell or Binance Alpha addressing the specific minting wallet or explaining whether the issuance was part of a vesting schedule, treasury action, or an exploit. Without that disclosure, the incident has understandably been labeled a potential “rug” by traders watching their positions evaporate in real time.​ Who is Piggycell Piggycell is marketed as a Korean power‑bank sharing network that has been tokenized into a DePIN and real‑world asset (RWA) play…

Binance Alpha’s Piggycell faces scrutiny after brutal crash

Piggycell’s PIGGY token crashed after a sudden mint‑and‑dump, raising hard questions over token controls, smart‑contract design and Binance Alpha’s listing safeguards.

Summary

  • Large, sudden PIGGY mint linked to one wallet preceded a violent intraday price collapse.​
  • Piggycell markets itself as a Korean DePIN power‑bank network tokenized via PIGGY on Binance Alpha.​
  • Lack of immediate, detailed disclosure from Piggycell or Binance fuels rug‑pull accusations and trust concerns.

Piggycell’s PIGGY (PIGGY) token appears to have suffered a violent intraday collapse after a sudden spike in freshly minted tokens hit the market, triggering renewed questions over token controls and Binance’s Alpha listing standards. Onchain sleuths are now scrutinizing a single wallet that allegedly minted and dumped millions of dollars’ worth of PIGGY within minutes.​

What happened to PIGGY

According to on-chain monitoring accounts, a wallet identified as 0x942f360d8a265aFcfDFa564429550DD755F96896 minted a large batch of new PIGGY tokens and rapidly sold them into the market, coinciding with a reported intraday drawdown of around 90%. Price trackers show PIGGY trading around the 0.4 dollar range recently, with sharp volatility and elevated volumes consistent with forced selling and panic exits.​

At the time of writing, there is no public statement from Piggycell or Binance Alpha addressing the specific minting wallet or explaining whether the issuance was part of a vesting schedule, treasury action, or an exploit. Without that disclosure, the incident has understandably been labeled a potential “rug” by traders watching their positions evaporate in real time.​

Who is Piggycell

Piggycell is marketed as a Korean power‑bank sharing network that has been tokenized into a DePIN and real‑world asset (RWA) play under the PIGGY ticker. The project’s pitch is simple: users rent portable power banks from a physical network of stations, while token holders earn incentives tied to real-world device usage and uptime.​

PIGGY launched through Binance Alpha in late October, with a 100 million token supply split across BNB Chain and ICP, and an airdrop campaign designed to funnel early users via Alpha Points. Binance promoted Piggycell as a “top power bank network turned RWA & DePIN protocol,” underlining the platform’s desire to court physical‑infrastructure narratives.​

Rug pull, exploit, or mismanaged tokenomics?

The pattern desccribed by traders—sudden mint, aggressive dumping, vertical price collapse—is textbook rug‑pull or insider exit behavior, even if intent is not yet proven. Rug pulls typically rely either on hidden mint functions or concentrated insider holdings that can be offloaded onto retail without warning, leaving the market illiquid and shell‑shocked.

Source: https://crypto.news/binance-alphas-piggycell-faces-scrutiny-after-brutal-crash/

Market Opportunity
Stella Logo
Stella Price(ALPHA)
$0.005079
$0.005079$0.005079
-0.56%
USD
Stella (ALPHA) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Nasdaq-listed iPower reaches $30 million convertible note financing agreement to launch DAT strategy.

Nasdaq-listed iPower reaches $30 million convertible note financing agreement to launch DAT strategy.

PANews reported on December 23 that, according to Globenewswire, Nasdaq-listed e-commerce and supply chain platform iPower announced it has reached a $30 million
Share
PANews2025/12/23 22:19
SelectCam AI Launches Flagship AI-Powered Video Telematics Solutions for Global Fleet Safety

SelectCam AI Launches Flagship AI-Powered Video Telematics Solutions for Global Fleet Safety

SHENZHEN, China–(BUSINESS WIRE)–SelectCam AI, a China-based, product-driven technology company, today announced the launch of its flagship AI video telematics solutions
Share
AI Journal2025/12/23 21:48