Bitcoin’s pullback sparked fresh debate after Steve Hanke called the asset “highly speculative” and valueless.Bitcoin’s pullback sparked fresh debate after Steve Hanke called the asset “highly speculative” and valueless.

Analyst Pushes Back on Steve Hanke’s Claim Bitcoin Lacks Value

Bitcoin’s latest pullback has reignited a long-running argument over whether the asset has any real value, after economist Steve Hanke dismissed it as having “zero fundamental value” on X earlier today.

The comment landed during a volatile session that saw BTC dip toward the mid-$80,000 range, drawing sharp pushback from analysts and crypto figures who suggested that those judging the OG digital asset based on the market turmoil were missing the bigger picture.

Analysts Push Back as Bitcoin Slides Below $90K

Hanke, a Johns Hopkins professor, made his comments during a period of notable strain for cryptocurrencies. After several weeks of weakening from October peaks, Bitcoin’s price briefly hit a two-week low near $85,100 yesterday, according to market data.

On-chain analyst Axel Adler Jr. was quick to react, calling Hanke’s assessment “absolutely incorrect” and arguing that Bitcoin is in a correction after years of growth and is transitioning into “a key element of the global financial system.”

Others framed the debate around trust and monetary history, with trader Carpe_Diem comparing the cryptocurrency’s supposed lack of value to fiat money, pointing to long-term loss of purchasing power in the U.S. dollar.

“Oh. You mean, like that fiat currency we call the US Dollar?” they asked, posting a chart showing the dollar’s 86% loss in purchasing power since 1972.

At the same time as the price drop, network data from December 9-14 showed a series of sharp daily drops in Bitcoin’s estimated hashrate, totaling drops of up to 12.8%. However, Adler cautioned that network metrics alone cannot confirm explanations for the occurrence circulating in the press, including reports of mining shutdowns in China.

Market Value, Macro Pressure, and the Bigger Debate

Price action has added weight to the argument on both sides. At the time of writing, Bitcoin was down around 3.4% over the past 24 hours as it continues to underperform its late-November highs near $100,000.

Ethereum slipped below $3,000 during the same window, while major altcoins such as XRP, Solana, and Cardano also posted short-term losses. The sell-off coincided with $210 million in liquidations within an hour, as reported by CryptoPotato, highlighting how leveraged positioning amplified the move.

Supporters argue that market value itself challenges the “zero value” claim. Swan Bitcoin quoted analyst Checkmate on December 15, noting that more than $1 trillion in capital has flowed into Bitcoin as a store of savings.

Commentator Daniel Tschinkel added that focusing only on price ignores Bitcoin’s global payment network and resistance to control.

Still, skeptics have pointed to tightening financial conditions and fragile technical levels, with some analysts now warning that delayed U.S. rate cuts could keep pressure on risk assets into early 2026, and the bearish scenarios could place BTC far lower before any sustained recovery.

For now, the clash between traditional economic theory and Bitcoin’s growing role in markets shows no sign of fading, especially when sharp drawdowns give critics fresh talking points.

The post Analyst Pushes Back on Steve Hanke’s Claim Bitcoin Lacks Value appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

What We Know (and Don’t) About Modern Code Reviews

What We Know (and Don’t) About Modern Code Reviews

This article traces the evolution of modern code review from formal inspections to tool-driven workflows, maps key research themes, and highlights a critical gap
Share
Hackernoon2025/12/17 17:00
X claims the right to share your private AI chats with everyone under new rules – no opt out

X claims the right to share your private AI chats with everyone under new rules – no opt out

X says its Terms of Service will change Jan. 15, 2026, expanding how the platform defines user “Content” and adding contract language tied to the operation and
Share
CryptoSlate2025/12/17 19:24
Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference

Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference

The post Michael Saylor Pushes Digital Capital Narrative At Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The suitcoiners are in town.  From a low-key, circular podium in the middle of a lavish New York City event hall, Strategy executive chairman Michael Saylor took the mic and opened the Bitcoin Treasuries Unconference event. He joked awkwardly about the orange ties, dresses, caps and other merch to the (mostly male) audience of who’s-who in the bitcoin treasury company world.  Once he got onto the regular beat, it was much of the same: calm and relaxed, speaking freely and with confidence, his keynote was heavy on the metaphors and larger historical stories. Treasury companies are like Rockefeller’s Standard Oil in its early years, Michael Saylor said: We’ve just discovered crude oil and now we’re making sense of the myriad ways in which we can use it — the automobile revolution and jet fuel is still well ahead of us.  Established, trillion-dollar companies not using AI because of “security concerns” make them slow and stupid — just like companies and individuals rejecting digital assets now make them poor and weak.  “I’d like to think that we understood our business five years ago; we didn’t.”  We went from a defensive investment into bitcoin, Saylor said, to opportunistic, to strategic, and finally transformational; “only then did we realize that we were different.” Michael Saylor: You Come Into My Financial History House?! Jokes aside, Michael Saylor is very welcome to the warm waters of our financial past. He acquitted himself honorably by invoking the British Consol — though mispronouncing it, and misdating it to the 1780s; Pelham’s consolidation of debts happened in the 1750s and perpetual government debt existed well before then — and comparing it to the gold standard and the future of bitcoin. He’s right that Strategy’s STRC product in many ways imitates the consols; irredeemable, perpetual debt, issued at par, with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:12