The post Ethereum co-founder dismisses China’s artificial superintelligence goal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum co-founder, Vitalik Buterin, engagedThe post Ethereum co-founder dismisses China’s artificial superintelligence goal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Ethereum co-founder, Vitalik Buterin, engaged

Ethereum co-founder dismisses China’s artificial superintelligence goal

Ethereum co-founder, Vitalik Buterin, engaged in a debate on X regarding the narrative of China and the U.S. being neck and neck in the AI war.

Through a series of posts and responses on the social media platform X, Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum’s co-founder, challenged the current popular narrative that the United States is locked in an inescapable “arms race” for Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) with China. 

Is a moratorium on AI development needed? 

Senator Bernie Sanders took to X to advocate for a halt to the rapid expansion of AI infrastructure, proposing a moratorium on the building of the massive data centers currently causing the “unregulated sprint” of AI development. 

Sanders’ view is that a temporary pause would give democratic institutions the necessary time to “catch up” and ensure that the technology will benefit the general public and not just the wealthiest 1%.

Large-scale data centers currently consume immense amounts of electricity and water, with some individual facilities projected to use as much power as 750,000 homes.

In response, Buterin wrote out the pros and cons of such a slowdown. He expressed support for distinguishing between “supersized clusters” and consumer-grade AI writing, and he prefers decentralized progress. 

But he also raised concerns that a simple moratorium might be easily worked around by developers and fail to meet its intended safety goals. 

Rather than a moratorium, he proposed the idea of a “pause button” that could cut off power to AI supercomputers during future critical moments.

Is China really racing toward Artificial Superintelligence?

A comment on Sanders’ post read that any U.S. slowdown while China continues to produce at the same pace would mean the U.S. losing its lead in a “new cold war.” 

Responding to this perspective, Buterin stated, “I feel like these claims that China is determined to race to ASI are often overstated and not really well-backed by evidence.”

Recent industry reports are in Buterin’s favor and have revealed that while China is a dominant force in AI research and the industry as a whole, it still faces significant problems. For instance, the 2025 AI Index Report from Stanford shows that U.S. private investment in AI reached $109 billion, which is nearly 12 times that of China. 

Chinese tech leaders have also recently voiced concerns over the “severe problem” of hardware shortages due to U.S. export controls on advanced chips, and experts believe these restrictions have widened the gap in actual model training capabilities.

Russia, another adversary that American AI proponents point to in the argument for ignoring the speed limit in the ASI race, has also had its fair share of setbacks in the AI race. As Cryptopolitan reported in November, Russia has had missteps since it began publicly displaying its AI-powered products, even in the presence of President Vladimir Putin.

The long-serving leader of the former large country has also spoken about the technology’s potential benefits as a modern invention, his country is willing to take advantage of, as well as the perils of artificial intelligence.

“This is an important and very difficult issue,” the head of state noted during a meeting of Russia’s human rights council, as reported by Cryptopolitan earlier this month.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days – normally $100/mo.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/buterin-china-artificial-superintelligence/

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.003146
$0.003146$0.003146
-6.81%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

[OPINION] Honduras’ election turmoil offers a warning — and a mirror — for the Philippines

IN PROTEST. Supporters of the Liberty and Refoundation party protest in front of the presidential palace in support of Honduran President Xiomara Castro in what
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:00
UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

UST honors ‘heaven-sent’ Pastrana, Soriano as Tigresses reignite UAAP contender fire

After crossing paths in UST for the first time in UAAP Season 86, Kent Pastrana and Eka Soriano leave the Growling Tigresses' lair as two-time champions, reigniting
Share
Rappler2025/12/19 20:21