Author: Aki Wu Talks Blockchain In late October 2025, Nvidia's stock price reached a new all-time high, pushing its market capitalization past the $5 trillion mark, making it the first company globally to cross this threshold. Since the emergence of ChatGPT in late 2022, Nvidia's stock price has increased more than 12-fold. The AI revolution has not only driven the S&P 500 to new highs but also sparked discussions about a tech valuation bubble. Today, Nvidia's market capitalization even exceeds the total size of the entire cryptocurrency market, and in terms of global GDP ranking, Nvidia's market capitalization is second only to the United States and China. Remarkably, this AI superstar also had a "honeymoon period" in the cryptocurrency field. This article will review Nvidia's tumultuous history with the cryptocurrency mining industry and why it chose to withdraw and shift its focus to its core AI business. Crypto Bull Market Frenzy: Gaming Graphics Cards Turn into "Money Printing Machines" Looking back at Nvidia's history is like reading a legend of the ever-evolving narrative of technology. Founded in 1993, Nvidia started by inventing the GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) and rode the wave of the PC gaming boom in the late 1990s. Nvidia's GeForce series graphics cards were a huge success, and the company quickly rose to become a graphics card giant. However, when the gaming market gradually saturated and growth slowed, Nvidia also faced the predicament of unsold inventory. Fortunately, opportunity always favors the prepared—a major turning point was the cryptocurrency boom. In 2017, the prices of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum soared, sparking a "mining" craze. Because GPUs are ideally suited for parallel computing in mining, miners worldwide scrambled for graphics cards, turning them into money-printing machines with supply falling short of demand and prices skyrocketing. Nvidia emerged as one of the biggest winners behind this crypto bull market, reaping huge profits from card sales. Starting in the second half of 2020, the cryptocurrency market rebounded after a two-year hiatus. Bitcoin prices surged from less than $15,000 in the middle of the year to a peak of over $60,000 in early 2021, while Ethereum rose from a few hundred dollars to over $2,000. This new wave of price increases reignited the GPU mining frenzy. Miners snapped up the new generation of GeForce RTX 30 series graphics cards, leading to a shortage of high-end cards originally intended for gamers, plunging the market into a frenzy of "supply falling short of demand." While NVIDIA's RTX 30 series graphics cards initially surprised gamers with their high performance and cost-effectiveness, the soaring profits from Ethereum mining pushed their actual selling prices to outrageous levels. The RTX 3060, with a suggested retail price of 2499 RMB, was being resold for 5499 RMB, and the flagship RTX 3090 was even being priced close to 20,000 RMB. However, the persistent shortage of graphics cards brought the conflict between gamers and miners to the forefront. Nvidia opted for a "dual-track" approach, simultaneously lowering the Ethereum hash rate for its gamer-oriented GeForce cards (starting with the RTX 3060). However, this was later discovered to be a smokescreen. In reality, miners discovered that by plugging the RTX 3060 with a "dummy HDMI cable," it would perceive other graphics cards as also functioning as display adapters, thus bypassing the hash rate limitations in multi-GPU scenarios and achieving full-speed mining. Andreas demonstrated this on his Twitter account. On the other hand, a series of Cryptocurrency Mining Processors (CMPs) were launched specifically for miners, attempting to "divide the market." The official blog stated explicitly that day: "GeForce is born for gamers, CMP is born for professional miners." CMPs would eliminate display output, use open baffles to improve airflow in densely packed mining racks, and lower peak voltage/frequency for stable energy efficiency. However, precisely because CMPs lacked display output and had a short warranty period, exiting the market was more difficult for miners. GeForces, on the other hand, could be used for mining and could be refurbished and resold to struggling miners, offering better residual value and liquidity. Therefore, this project ultimately generated much hype but little substance, eventually fading from public view. According to Nvidia's financial report, graphics cards used for mining accounted for a quarter of its shipments in the first fiscal quarter of 2021, with sales of cryptocurrency-specific chips (CMP series) reaching $155 million. Fueled by the crypto boom, Nvidia's revenue for the entire year of 2021 soared to $26.9 billion, a 61% increase year-over-year, and the company's market capitalization briefly surpassed $800 billion. However, this favorable situation did not last long. On May 21, 2021, the Financial Stability and Development Committee of the State Council of China proposed to severely crack down on Bitcoin mining and trading. Subsequently, mining farms in Xinjiang, Qinghai, Sichuan and other places were shut down, and the mining business quickly came to a halt. In the same month and the following month, Bitcoin hashrate and price both came under pressure, and miners were forced to relocate or liquidate their equipment. By September 24, the People's Bank of China and multiple departments issued a joint notice, defining all virtual currency-related transactions as illegal financial activities and proposing a nationwide "orderly cleanup of the mining industry," further "closing the loopholes" at the policy level. For those in the Huaqiangbei mining machine industry, the cycle of boom and bust is nothing new. Those who experienced the mining machine "crash" of early 2018 still vividly remember it; some withdrew from the market in despair, but a few persevered and weathered the storm, investing their unsold machines into their own mining farms, waiting for the next boom. As it turns out, the bull market of 2020-2021 once again allowed those who held on to turn their fortunes around. In September 2022, a landmark event occurred in the crypto industry: the Ethereum blockchain completed its "merge" upgrade, transitioning from a Proof-of-Work (PoW) mechanism to a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanism, eliminating the need for a large number of GPUs to participate in mining. This marked the end of the long-standing era of GPU mining. Without the specific needs of crypto miners, the global GPU market cooled rapidly, directly impacting Nvidia's performance. In the third quarter of 2022, Nvidia's revenue declined by 17% year-on-year to $5.93 billion, and net profit was only $680 million, a year-on-year decrease of 72%. Nvidia's stock price once fell to around $165 in 2022, nearly halving from its peak, and the former crypto boom instantly became a burden on its performance. Drawing a line: Nvidia's breakup with the mining industry Faced with the frenzy in the mining industry, complaints from gamers, and problems arising from cyclical profits, Nvidia gradually realized it needed to find a balance within the cryptocurrency mining boom and, at the right time, "draw a clear line" with it. As concerns about a bubble emerged from soaring cryptocurrency prices, the company also suffered from financial compliance issues. A subsequent investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) found that Nvidia had failed to adequately disclose the contribution of cryptocurrency mining to its gaming graphics card revenue growth for two consecutive quarters in fiscal year 2018. This was deemed improper disclosure. In May 2022, Nvidia agreed to settle with the SEC and pay a $5.5 million fine. This incident forced Nvidia to re-evaluate its delicate relationship with the crypto industry; while the cryptocurrency mining boom brought considerable profits, its volatility and regulatory risks could also damage the company's reputation and performance. After Ethereum switched to PoS in 2022, GPU mining demand plummeted, and Nvidia's gaming graphics card business quickly returned to normal supply and demand. Jensen Huang has also repeatedly emphasized that the company's future growth will primarily come from areas such as artificial intelligence, data centers, and autonomous driving, rather than relying on speculative businesses like cryptocurrencies. It can be said that after experiencing the highs and lows of the "mining card craze," Nvidia decisively distanced itself from this highly volatile industry, investing more resources in the broader and more socially valuable AI computing landscape. Furthermore, Nvidia's latest Inception program website for AI startups explicitly lists "unqualified organization types," including "crypto-related companies," demonstrating Nvidia's clear desire to distance itself from its former crypto associates. So, after fully embracing the AI industry, will Nvidia's chip business still intersect with the crypto industry? On the surface, since Ethereum bid farewell to the "mining era," the connection between GPUs and traditional crypto mining has weakened significantly. Major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin have long used dedicated ASIC miners, and GPUs are no longer the highly sought-after "golden goose" for crypto miners as they once were. However, the two fields are not entirely without overlap, and new points of convergence are emerging in different forms. Some companies that previously focused on cryptocurrency mining are shifting their business focus to AI computing power services, becoming new customers of Nvidia. Furthermore, traditional Bitcoin mining companies are also exploring using surplus electricity and space resources to undertake AI computing tasks. Some large mining companies have recently replaced some of their equipment with GPU hardware for training AI models, believing that AI training offers a more stable and reliable source of revenue compared to the volatile cryptocurrency mining industry. The person who made the most money in the AI gold rush — Nvidia, the company that sells "shovels" In November 2022, OpenAI's ChatGPT emerged, causing a huge sensation worldwide with its large-scale AI models. For NVIDIA, this was undoubtedly another once-in-a-century opportunity. The world suddenly realized that to power these computationally intensive AI monsters, NVIDIA's GPU hardware support was indispensable. Following ChatGPT's explosive popularity, major tech companies and startups flocked to the "large model" track, leading to an explosive growth in the computing power required to train AI models. NVIDIA astutely recognized this fundamental truth: regardless of technological advancements, computing power will always be the basic currency of the digital world. Currently, Nvidia holds over 90% of the market share for large-scale model training chips. Its A100, H100, and next-generation Blackwell/H200 GPUs have become industry standards for AI acceleration computing. Due to demand far exceeding supply, Nvidia possesses extraordinary pricing power and profit margins in high-end AI chips. Goldman Sachs predicts that from 2025 to 2027, the capital expenditures of just the five major cloud service providers—Amazon, Meta, Google, Microsoft, and Oracle—are expected to approach $1.4 trillion, nearly tripling compared to the previous three years. These massive investments have laid the foundation for Nvidia's astronomical market capitalization. However, the AI field once experienced a shockwave of "cost reduction and efficiency improvement"—the explosive popularity of the open-source large model DeepSeek. The DeepSeek project claimed to have trained the DeepSeek V3 model with performance comparable to GPT-4 at an extremely low cost of only about $5.576 million, and subsequently released the R1 model with ultra-low inference cost. The industry was in an uproar at the time, with many predicting Nvidia's demise. They argued that the emergence of such low-cost AI models meant that small and medium-sized enterprises could deploy large models with fewer GPUs, potentially impacting demand for Nvidia's high-end GPUs. The question of whether "AI computing power demand will be replaced by an efficiency revolution" became a hot topic. Affected by this expectation, Nvidia's stock price plummeted, closing down about 17%, wiping out approximately $589 billion in market capitalization in a single day (considered one of the largest single-day market capitalization losses in US stock market history). However, just a few months later, it became clear that these concerns were short-sighted. DeepSeek did not reduce the demand for computing power; instead, it triggered a new surge in demand. Its technical approach essentially achieved "computing power equality"—through algorithmic innovation and model distillation, it significantly lowered the hardware barrier for large models, making AI applications more affordable for more institutions and enterprises. On the surface, it seemed that "less computing power was needed" due to improved model efficiency; but in reality, the DeepSeek phenomenon greatly popularized AI applications, leading to an exponential increase in computing power demand. A large number of enterprises rushed to adopt DeepSeek, triggering a wave of AI applications, with inference computing quickly becoming the new main driver of computing power consumption. This precisely illustrates the famous "Jeves' paradox"—increased technical efficiency actually accelerates resource consumption. DeepSeek lowered the barrier to AI and led to a surge in applications, resulting in even more insufficient computing resources. As it turns out, the emergence of a new AI model often translates into a surge of new GPU orders. The more AI innovation Nvidia produces, the stronger it becomes, a fact once again validated in the DeepSeek controversy. Nvidia's financial report released in February 2025 showed that its data center business significantly exceeded expectations. At a deeper level, the success of DeepSeek is not a threat to Nvidia; rather, it demonstrates that "cost reduction and efficiency improvement" can lead to larger-scale application expansion, thereby driving up total computing power demand. This time, DeepSeek has become new fuel for Nvidia's computing power empire. As AI pioneer Andrew Ng said, "AI is the new electricity." In the era where AI is electricity, computing power providers like Nvidia undoubtedly play the role of power companies. Through massive data centers and GPU clusters, they continuously supply "energy" to various industries, driving intelligent transformation. This is also the core logic behind Nvidia's market value soaring from $1 trillion to $5 trillion in just two years—a qualitative leap in global demand for AI computing power, with tech giants around the world investing in computing power in an arms race-like manner. After its market capitalization climbed to $5 trillion, Nvidia's influence and scale have surpassed even the economic influence of many national governments. Nvidia is no longer just a graphics card manufacturer that makes games run smoother; it has transformed into the fuel of the AI era, becoming the undisputed "shovel seller" in this gold rush. With its increasing size, the wealth creation stories of Nvidia employees have become legendary in the industry, with many employees holding stock worth more than their annual salaries. Nvidia itself has achieved one leap forward after another by continuously "telling" new technological narratives. Gaming graphics cards opened the first door for it, the mining boom provided a second wave of growth, and AI has propelled Nvidia to its true peak.Author: Aki Wu Talks Blockchain In late October 2025, Nvidia's stock price reached a new all-time high, pushing its market capitalization past the $5 trillion mark, making it the first company globally to cross this threshold. Since the emergence of ChatGPT in late 2022, Nvidia's stock price has increased more than 12-fold. The AI revolution has not only driven the S&P 500 to new highs but also sparked discussions about a tech valuation bubble. Today, Nvidia's market capitalization even exceeds the total size of the entire cryptocurrency market, and in terms of global GDP ranking, Nvidia's market capitalization is second only to the United States and China. Remarkably, this AI superstar also had a "honeymoon period" in the cryptocurrency field. This article will review Nvidia's tumultuous history with the cryptocurrency mining industry and why it chose to withdraw and shift its focus to its core AI business. Crypto Bull Market Frenzy: Gaming Graphics Cards Turn into "Money Printing Machines" Looking back at Nvidia's history is like reading a legend of the ever-evolving narrative of technology. Founded in 1993, Nvidia started by inventing the GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) and rode the wave of the PC gaming boom in the late 1990s. Nvidia's GeForce series graphics cards were a huge success, and the company quickly rose to become a graphics card giant. However, when the gaming market gradually saturated and growth slowed, Nvidia also faced the predicament of unsold inventory. Fortunately, opportunity always favors the prepared—a major turning point was the cryptocurrency boom. In 2017, the prices of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum soared, sparking a "mining" craze. Because GPUs are ideally suited for parallel computing in mining, miners worldwide scrambled for graphics cards, turning them into money-printing machines with supply falling short of demand and prices skyrocketing. Nvidia emerged as one of the biggest winners behind this crypto bull market, reaping huge profits from card sales. Starting in the second half of 2020, the cryptocurrency market rebounded after a two-year hiatus. Bitcoin prices surged from less than $15,000 in the middle of the year to a peak of over $60,000 in early 2021, while Ethereum rose from a few hundred dollars to over $2,000. This new wave of price increases reignited the GPU mining frenzy. Miners snapped up the new generation of GeForce RTX 30 series graphics cards, leading to a shortage of high-end cards originally intended for gamers, plunging the market into a frenzy of "supply falling short of demand." While NVIDIA's RTX 30 series graphics cards initially surprised gamers with their high performance and cost-effectiveness, the soaring profits from Ethereum mining pushed their actual selling prices to outrageous levels. The RTX 3060, with a suggested retail price of 2499 RMB, was being resold for 5499 RMB, and the flagship RTX 3090 was even being priced close to 20,000 RMB. However, the persistent shortage of graphics cards brought the conflict between gamers and miners to the forefront. Nvidia opted for a "dual-track" approach, simultaneously lowering the Ethereum hash rate for its gamer-oriented GeForce cards (starting with the RTX 3060). However, this was later discovered to be a smokescreen. In reality, miners discovered that by plugging the RTX 3060 with a "dummy HDMI cable," it would perceive other graphics cards as also functioning as display adapters, thus bypassing the hash rate limitations in multi-GPU scenarios and achieving full-speed mining. Andreas demonstrated this on his Twitter account. On the other hand, a series of Cryptocurrency Mining Processors (CMPs) were launched specifically for miners, attempting to "divide the market." The official blog stated explicitly that day: "GeForce is born for gamers, CMP is born for professional miners." CMPs would eliminate display output, use open baffles to improve airflow in densely packed mining racks, and lower peak voltage/frequency for stable energy efficiency. However, precisely because CMPs lacked display output and had a short warranty period, exiting the market was more difficult for miners. GeForces, on the other hand, could be used for mining and could be refurbished and resold to struggling miners, offering better residual value and liquidity. Therefore, this project ultimately generated much hype but little substance, eventually fading from public view. According to Nvidia's financial report, graphics cards used for mining accounted for a quarter of its shipments in the first fiscal quarter of 2021, with sales of cryptocurrency-specific chips (CMP series) reaching $155 million. Fueled by the crypto boom, Nvidia's revenue for the entire year of 2021 soared to $26.9 billion, a 61% increase year-over-year, and the company's market capitalization briefly surpassed $800 billion. However, this favorable situation did not last long. On May 21, 2021, the Financial Stability and Development Committee of the State Council of China proposed to severely crack down on Bitcoin mining and trading. Subsequently, mining farms in Xinjiang, Qinghai, Sichuan and other places were shut down, and the mining business quickly came to a halt. In the same month and the following month, Bitcoin hashrate and price both came under pressure, and miners were forced to relocate or liquidate their equipment. By September 24, the People's Bank of China and multiple departments issued a joint notice, defining all virtual currency-related transactions as illegal financial activities and proposing a nationwide "orderly cleanup of the mining industry," further "closing the loopholes" at the policy level. For those in the Huaqiangbei mining machine industry, the cycle of boom and bust is nothing new. Those who experienced the mining machine "crash" of early 2018 still vividly remember it; some withdrew from the market in despair, but a few persevered and weathered the storm, investing their unsold machines into their own mining farms, waiting for the next boom. As it turns out, the bull market of 2020-2021 once again allowed those who held on to turn their fortunes around. In September 2022, a landmark event occurred in the crypto industry: the Ethereum blockchain completed its "merge" upgrade, transitioning from a Proof-of-Work (PoW) mechanism to a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanism, eliminating the need for a large number of GPUs to participate in mining. This marked the end of the long-standing era of GPU mining. Without the specific needs of crypto miners, the global GPU market cooled rapidly, directly impacting Nvidia's performance. In the third quarter of 2022, Nvidia's revenue declined by 17% year-on-year to $5.93 billion, and net profit was only $680 million, a year-on-year decrease of 72%. Nvidia's stock price once fell to around $165 in 2022, nearly halving from its peak, and the former crypto boom instantly became a burden on its performance. Drawing a line: Nvidia's breakup with the mining industry Faced with the frenzy in the mining industry, complaints from gamers, and problems arising from cyclical profits, Nvidia gradually realized it needed to find a balance within the cryptocurrency mining boom and, at the right time, "draw a clear line" with it. As concerns about a bubble emerged from soaring cryptocurrency prices, the company also suffered from financial compliance issues. A subsequent investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) found that Nvidia had failed to adequately disclose the contribution of cryptocurrency mining to its gaming graphics card revenue growth for two consecutive quarters in fiscal year 2018. This was deemed improper disclosure. In May 2022, Nvidia agreed to settle with the SEC and pay a $5.5 million fine. This incident forced Nvidia to re-evaluate its delicate relationship with the crypto industry; while the cryptocurrency mining boom brought considerable profits, its volatility and regulatory risks could also damage the company's reputation and performance. After Ethereum switched to PoS in 2022, GPU mining demand plummeted, and Nvidia's gaming graphics card business quickly returned to normal supply and demand. Jensen Huang has also repeatedly emphasized that the company's future growth will primarily come from areas such as artificial intelligence, data centers, and autonomous driving, rather than relying on speculative businesses like cryptocurrencies. It can be said that after experiencing the highs and lows of the "mining card craze," Nvidia decisively distanced itself from this highly volatile industry, investing more resources in the broader and more socially valuable AI computing landscape. Furthermore, Nvidia's latest Inception program website for AI startups explicitly lists "unqualified organization types," including "crypto-related companies," demonstrating Nvidia's clear desire to distance itself from its former crypto associates. So, after fully embracing the AI industry, will Nvidia's chip business still intersect with the crypto industry? On the surface, since Ethereum bid farewell to the "mining era," the connection between GPUs and traditional crypto mining has weakened significantly. Major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin have long used dedicated ASIC miners, and GPUs are no longer the highly sought-after "golden goose" for crypto miners as they once were. However, the two fields are not entirely without overlap, and new points of convergence are emerging in different forms. Some companies that previously focused on cryptocurrency mining are shifting their business focus to AI computing power services, becoming new customers of Nvidia. Furthermore, traditional Bitcoin mining companies are also exploring using surplus electricity and space resources to undertake AI computing tasks. Some large mining companies have recently replaced some of their equipment with GPU hardware for training AI models, believing that AI training offers a more stable and reliable source of revenue compared to the volatile cryptocurrency mining industry. The person who made the most money in the AI gold rush — Nvidia, the company that sells "shovels" In November 2022, OpenAI's ChatGPT emerged, causing a huge sensation worldwide with its large-scale AI models. For NVIDIA, this was undoubtedly another once-in-a-century opportunity. The world suddenly realized that to power these computationally intensive AI monsters, NVIDIA's GPU hardware support was indispensable. Following ChatGPT's explosive popularity, major tech companies and startups flocked to the "large model" track, leading to an explosive growth in the computing power required to train AI models. NVIDIA astutely recognized this fundamental truth: regardless of technological advancements, computing power will always be the basic currency of the digital world. Currently, Nvidia holds over 90% of the market share for large-scale model training chips. Its A100, H100, and next-generation Blackwell/H200 GPUs have become industry standards for AI acceleration computing. Due to demand far exceeding supply, Nvidia possesses extraordinary pricing power and profit margins in high-end AI chips. Goldman Sachs predicts that from 2025 to 2027, the capital expenditures of just the five major cloud service providers—Amazon, Meta, Google, Microsoft, and Oracle—are expected to approach $1.4 trillion, nearly tripling compared to the previous three years. These massive investments have laid the foundation for Nvidia's astronomical market capitalization. However, the AI field once experienced a shockwave of "cost reduction and efficiency improvement"—the explosive popularity of the open-source large model DeepSeek. The DeepSeek project claimed to have trained the DeepSeek V3 model with performance comparable to GPT-4 at an extremely low cost of only about $5.576 million, and subsequently released the R1 model with ultra-low inference cost. The industry was in an uproar at the time, with many predicting Nvidia's demise. They argued that the emergence of such low-cost AI models meant that small and medium-sized enterprises could deploy large models with fewer GPUs, potentially impacting demand for Nvidia's high-end GPUs. The question of whether "AI computing power demand will be replaced by an efficiency revolution" became a hot topic. Affected by this expectation, Nvidia's stock price plummeted, closing down about 17%, wiping out approximately $589 billion in market capitalization in a single day (considered one of the largest single-day market capitalization losses in US stock market history). However, just a few months later, it became clear that these concerns were short-sighted. DeepSeek did not reduce the demand for computing power; instead, it triggered a new surge in demand. Its technical approach essentially achieved "computing power equality"—through algorithmic innovation and model distillation, it significantly lowered the hardware barrier for large models, making AI applications more affordable for more institutions and enterprises. On the surface, it seemed that "less computing power was needed" due to improved model efficiency; but in reality, the DeepSeek phenomenon greatly popularized AI applications, leading to an exponential increase in computing power demand. A large number of enterprises rushed to adopt DeepSeek, triggering a wave of AI applications, with inference computing quickly becoming the new main driver of computing power consumption. This precisely illustrates the famous "Jeves' paradox"—increased technical efficiency actually accelerates resource consumption. DeepSeek lowered the barrier to AI and led to a surge in applications, resulting in even more insufficient computing resources. As it turns out, the emergence of a new AI model often translates into a surge of new GPU orders. The more AI innovation Nvidia produces, the stronger it becomes, a fact once again validated in the DeepSeek controversy. Nvidia's financial report released in February 2025 showed that its data center business significantly exceeded expectations. At a deeper level, the success of DeepSeek is not a threat to Nvidia; rather, it demonstrates that "cost reduction and efficiency improvement" can lead to larger-scale application expansion, thereby driving up total computing power demand. This time, DeepSeek has become new fuel for Nvidia's computing power empire. As AI pioneer Andrew Ng said, "AI is the new electricity." In the era where AI is electricity, computing power providers like Nvidia undoubtedly play the role of power companies. Through massive data centers and GPU clusters, they continuously supply "energy" to various industries, driving intelligent transformation. This is also the core logic behind Nvidia's market value soaring from $1 trillion to $5 trillion in just two years—a qualitative leap in global demand for AI computing power, with tech giants around the world investing in computing power in an arms race-like manner. After its market capitalization climbed to $5 trillion, Nvidia's influence and scale have surpassed even the economic influence of many national governments. Nvidia is no longer just a graphics card manufacturer that makes games run smoother; it has transformed into the fuel of the AI era, becoming the undisputed "shovel seller" in this gold rush. With its increasing size, the wealth creation stories of Nvidia employees have become legendary in the industry, with many employees holding stock worth more than their annual salaries. Nvidia itself has achieved one leap forward after another by continuously "telling" new technological narratives. Gaming graphics cards opened the first door for it, the mining boom provided a second wave of growth, and AI has propelled Nvidia to its true peak.

The world's first company to surpass a $5 trillion market capitalization: A look back at Nvidia's brief honeymoon period with cryptocurrencies.

2025/11/03 09:30
12 min di lettura
Per feedback o dubbi su questo contenuto, contattateci all'indirizzo [email protected].

Author: Aki Wu Talks Blockchain

In late October 2025, Nvidia's stock price reached a new all-time high, pushing its market capitalization past the $5 trillion mark, making it the first company globally to cross this threshold. Since the emergence of ChatGPT in late 2022, Nvidia's stock price has increased more than 12-fold. The AI revolution has not only driven the S&P 500 to new highs but also sparked discussions about a tech valuation bubble. Today, Nvidia's market capitalization even exceeds the total size of the entire cryptocurrency market, and in terms of global GDP ranking, Nvidia's market capitalization is second only to the United States and China. Remarkably, this AI superstar also had a "honeymoon period" in the cryptocurrency field. This article will review Nvidia's tumultuous history with the cryptocurrency mining industry and why it chose to withdraw and shift its focus to its core AI business.

Crypto Bull Market Frenzy: Gaming Graphics Cards Turn into "Money Printing Machines"

Looking back at Nvidia's history is like reading a legend of the ever-evolving narrative of technology. Founded in 1993, Nvidia started by inventing the GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) and rode the wave of the PC gaming boom in the late 1990s. Nvidia's GeForce series graphics cards were a huge success, and the company quickly rose to become a graphics card giant. However, when the gaming market gradually saturated and growth slowed, Nvidia also faced the predicament of unsold inventory. Fortunately, opportunity always favors the prepared—a major turning point was the cryptocurrency boom.

In 2017, the prices of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum soared, sparking a "mining" craze. Because GPUs are ideally suited for parallel computing in mining, miners worldwide scrambled for graphics cards, turning them into money-printing machines with supply falling short of demand and prices skyrocketing. Nvidia emerged as one of the biggest winners behind this crypto bull market, reaping huge profits from card sales.

Starting in the second half of 2020, the cryptocurrency market rebounded after a two-year hiatus. Bitcoin prices surged from less than $15,000 in the middle of the year to a peak of over $60,000 in early 2021, while Ethereum rose from a few hundred dollars to over $2,000. This new wave of price increases reignited the GPU mining frenzy. Miners snapped up the new generation of GeForce RTX 30 series graphics cards, leading to a shortage of high-end cards originally intended for gamers, plunging the market into a frenzy of "supply falling short of demand." While NVIDIA's RTX 30 series graphics cards initially surprised gamers with their high performance and cost-effectiveness, the soaring profits from Ethereum mining pushed their actual selling prices to outrageous levels. The RTX 3060, with a suggested retail price of 2499 RMB, was being resold for 5499 RMB, and the flagship RTX 3090 was even being priced close to 20,000 RMB.

However, the persistent shortage of graphics cards brought the conflict between gamers and miners to the forefront. Nvidia opted for a "dual-track" approach, simultaneously lowering the Ethereum hash rate for its gamer-oriented GeForce cards (starting with the RTX 3060). However, this was later discovered to be a smokescreen. In reality, miners discovered that by plugging the RTX 3060 with a "dummy HDMI cable," it would perceive other graphics cards as also functioning as display adapters, thus bypassing the hash rate limitations in multi-GPU scenarios and achieving full-speed mining.

Andreas demonstrated this on his Twitter account.

On the other hand, a series of Cryptocurrency Mining Processors (CMPs) were launched specifically for miners, attempting to "divide the market." The official blog stated explicitly that day: "GeForce is born for gamers, CMP is born for professional miners." CMPs would eliminate display output, use open baffles to improve airflow in densely packed mining racks, and lower peak voltage/frequency for stable energy efficiency. However, precisely because CMPs lacked display output and had a short warranty period, exiting the market was more difficult for miners. GeForces, on the other hand, could be used for mining and could be refurbished and resold to struggling miners, offering better residual value and liquidity. Therefore, this project ultimately generated much hype but little substance, eventually fading from public view.

According to Nvidia's financial report, graphics cards used for mining accounted for a quarter of its shipments in the first fiscal quarter of 2021, with sales of cryptocurrency-specific chips (CMP series) reaching $155 million. Fueled by the crypto boom, Nvidia's revenue for the entire year of 2021 soared to $26.9 billion, a 61% increase year-over-year, and the company's market capitalization briefly surpassed $800 billion.

However, this favorable situation did not last long. On May 21, 2021, the Financial Stability and Development Committee of the State Council of China proposed to severely crack down on Bitcoin mining and trading. Subsequently, mining farms in Xinjiang, Qinghai, Sichuan and other places were shut down, and the mining business quickly came to a halt. In the same month and the following month, Bitcoin hashrate and price both came under pressure, and miners were forced to relocate or liquidate their equipment. By September 24, the People's Bank of China and multiple departments issued a joint notice, defining all virtual currency-related transactions as illegal financial activities and proposing a nationwide "orderly cleanup of the mining industry," further "closing the loopholes" at the policy level.

For those in the Huaqiangbei mining machine industry, the cycle of boom and bust is nothing new. Those who experienced the mining machine "crash" of early 2018 still vividly remember it; some withdrew from the market in despair, but a few persevered and weathered the storm, investing their unsold machines into their own mining farms, waiting for the next boom. As it turns out, the bull market of 2020-2021 once again allowed those who held on to turn their fortunes around.

In September 2022, a landmark event occurred in the crypto industry: the Ethereum blockchain completed its "merge" upgrade, transitioning from a Proof-of-Work (PoW) mechanism to a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanism, eliminating the need for a large number of GPUs to participate in mining. This marked the end of the long-standing era of GPU mining. Without the specific needs of crypto miners, the global GPU market cooled rapidly, directly impacting Nvidia's performance. In the third quarter of 2022, Nvidia's revenue declined by 17% year-on-year to $5.93 billion, and net profit was only $680 million, a year-on-year decrease of 72%. Nvidia's stock price once fell to around $165 in 2022, nearly halving from its peak, and the former crypto boom instantly became a burden on its performance.

Drawing a line: Nvidia's breakup with the mining industry

Faced with the frenzy in the mining industry, complaints from gamers, and problems arising from cyclical profits, Nvidia gradually realized it needed to find a balance within the cryptocurrency mining boom and, at the right time, "draw a clear line" with it. As concerns about a bubble emerged from soaring cryptocurrency prices, the company also suffered from financial compliance issues. A subsequent investigation by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) found that Nvidia had failed to adequately disclose the contribution of cryptocurrency mining to its gaming graphics card revenue growth for two consecutive quarters in fiscal year 2018. This was deemed improper disclosure. In May 2022, Nvidia agreed to settle with the SEC and pay a $5.5 million fine. This incident forced Nvidia to re-evaluate its delicate relationship with the crypto industry; while the cryptocurrency mining boom brought considerable profits, its volatility and regulatory risks could also damage the company's reputation and performance.

After Ethereum switched to PoS in 2022, GPU mining demand plummeted, and Nvidia's gaming graphics card business quickly returned to normal supply and demand. Jensen Huang has also repeatedly emphasized that the company's future growth will primarily come from areas such as artificial intelligence, data centers, and autonomous driving, rather than relying on speculative businesses like cryptocurrencies. It can be said that after experiencing the highs and lows of the "mining card craze," Nvidia decisively distanced itself from this highly volatile industry, investing more resources in the broader and more socially valuable AI computing landscape. Furthermore, Nvidia's latest Inception program website for AI startups explicitly lists "unqualified organization types," including "crypto-related companies," demonstrating Nvidia's clear desire to distance itself from its former crypto associates.

So, after fully embracing the AI industry, will Nvidia's chip business still intersect with the crypto industry? On the surface, since Ethereum bid farewell to the "mining era," the connection between GPUs and traditional crypto mining has weakened significantly. Major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin have long used dedicated ASIC miners, and GPUs are no longer the highly sought-after "golden goose" for crypto miners as they once were. However, the two fields are not entirely without overlap, and new points of convergence are emerging in different forms.

Some companies that previously focused on cryptocurrency mining are shifting their business focus to AI computing power services, becoming new customers of Nvidia. Furthermore, traditional Bitcoin mining companies are also exploring using surplus electricity and space resources to undertake AI computing tasks. Some large mining companies have recently replaced some of their equipment with GPU hardware for training AI models, believing that AI training offers a more stable and reliable source of revenue compared to the volatile cryptocurrency mining industry.

The person who made the most money in the AI gold rush — Nvidia, the company that sells "shovels"

In November 2022, OpenAI's ChatGPT emerged, causing a huge sensation worldwide with its large-scale AI models. For NVIDIA, this was undoubtedly another once-in-a-century opportunity. The world suddenly realized that to power these computationally intensive AI monsters, NVIDIA's GPU hardware support was indispensable.

Following ChatGPT's explosive popularity, major tech companies and startups flocked to the "large model" track, leading to an explosive growth in the computing power required to train AI models. NVIDIA astutely recognized this fundamental truth: regardless of technological advancements, computing power will always be the basic currency of the digital world.

Currently, Nvidia holds over 90% of the market share for large-scale model training chips. Its A100, H100, and next-generation Blackwell/H200 GPUs have become industry standards for AI acceleration computing. Due to demand far exceeding supply, Nvidia possesses extraordinary pricing power and profit margins in high-end AI chips. Goldman Sachs predicts that from 2025 to 2027, the capital expenditures of just the five major cloud service providers—Amazon, Meta, Google, Microsoft, and Oracle—are expected to approach $1.4 trillion, nearly tripling compared to the previous three years. These massive investments have laid the foundation for Nvidia's astronomical market capitalization.

However, the AI field once experienced a shockwave of "cost reduction and efficiency improvement"—the explosive popularity of the open-source large model DeepSeek. The DeepSeek project claimed to have trained the DeepSeek V3 model with performance comparable to GPT-4 at an extremely low cost of only about $5.576 million, and subsequently released the R1 model with ultra-low inference cost.

The industry was in an uproar at the time, with many predicting Nvidia's demise. They argued that the emergence of such low-cost AI models meant that small and medium-sized enterprises could deploy large models with fewer GPUs, potentially impacting demand for Nvidia's high-end GPUs. The question of whether "AI computing power demand will be replaced by an efficiency revolution" became a hot topic. Affected by this expectation, Nvidia's stock price plummeted, closing down about 17%, wiping out approximately $589 billion in market capitalization in a single day (considered one of the largest single-day market capitalization losses in US stock market history).

However, just a few months later, it became clear that these concerns were short-sighted. DeepSeek did not reduce the demand for computing power; instead, it triggered a new surge in demand. Its technical approach essentially achieved "computing power equality"—through algorithmic innovation and model distillation, it significantly lowered the hardware barrier for large models, making AI applications more affordable for more institutions and enterprises. On the surface, it seemed that "less computing power was needed" due to improved model efficiency; but in reality, the DeepSeek phenomenon greatly popularized AI applications, leading to an exponential increase in computing power demand. A large number of enterprises rushed to adopt DeepSeek, triggering a wave of AI applications, with inference computing quickly becoming the new main driver of computing power consumption. This precisely illustrates the famous "Jeves' paradox"—increased technical efficiency actually accelerates resource consumption. DeepSeek lowered the barrier to AI and led to a surge in applications, resulting in even more insufficient computing resources.

As it turns out, the emergence of a new AI model often translates into a surge of new GPU orders. The more AI innovation Nvidia produces, the stronger it becomes, a fact once again validated in the DeepSeek controversy. Nvidia's financial report released in February 2025 showed that its data center business significantly exceeded expectations. At a deeper level, the success of DeepSeek is not a threat to Nvidia; rather, it demonstrates that "cost reduction and efficiency improvement" can lead to larger-scale application expansion, thereby driving up total computing power demand. This time, DeepSeek has become new fuel for Nvidia's computing power empire.

As AI pioneer Andrew Ng said, "AI is the new electricity." In the era where AI is electricity, computing power providers like Nvidia undoubtedly play the role of power companies. Through massive data centers and GPU clusters, they continuously supply "energy" to various industries, driving intelligent transformation. This is also the core logic behind Nvidia's market value soaring from $1 trillion to $5 trillion in just two years—a qualitative leap in global demand for AI computing power, with tech giants around the world investing in computing power in an arms race-like manner.

After its market capitalization climbed to $5 trillion, Nvidia's influence and scale have surpassed even the economic influence of many national governments. Nvidia is no longer just a graphics card manufacturer that makes games run smoother; it has transformed into the fuel of the AI era, becoming the undisputed "shovel seller" in this gold rush. With its increasing size, the wealth creation stories of Nvidia employees have become legendary in the industry, with many employees holding stock worth more than their annual salaries. Nvidia itself has achieved one leap forward after another by continuously "telling" new technological narratives. Gaming graphics cards opened the first door for it, the mining boom provided a second wave of growth, and AI has propelled Nvidia to its true peak.

Opportunità di mercato
Logo LOOK
Valore LOOK (LOOK)
$0.00411
$0.00411$0.00411
+0.73%
USD
Grafico dei prezzi in tempo reale di LOOK (LOOK)
Disclaimer: gli articoli ripubblicati su questo sito provengono da piattaforme pubbliche e sono forniti esclusivamente a scopo informativo. Non riflettono necessariamente le opinioni di MEXC. Tutti i diritti rimangono agli autori originali. Se ritieni che un contenuto violi i diritti di terze parti, contatta [email protected] per la rimozione. MEXC non fornisce alcuna garanzia in merito all'accuratezza, completezza o tempestività del contenuto e non è responsabile per eventuali azioni intraprese sulla base delle informazioni fornite. Il contenuto non costituisce consulenza finanziaria, legale o professionale di altro tipo, né deve essere considerato una raccomandazione o un'approvazione da parte di MEXC.

Potrebbe anche piacerti

Tennis Death Threats & Match Fixing: WTA Players Targeted

Tennis Death Threats & Match Fixing: WTA Players Targeted

Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions - Experts in Crypto Casinos WTA players Panna Udvardy
Condividi
Cryptsy2026/03/10 18:37
Swiss Crypto Bank Just Became the First Regulated Bank Inside the EU’s Blockchain Trading System

Swiss Crypto Bank Just Became the First Regulated Bank Inside the EU’s Blockchain Trading System

AMINA Bank AG joined 21X as its first fully regulated bank participant, connecting institutional-grade custody to the European Union’s only DLT-regulated trading
Condividi
Ethnews2026/03/10 18:10
Nasdaq Proposal Analysis: How Tokenized Securities Will Reshape the U.S. Stock Trading Ecosystem

Nasdaq Proposal Analysis: How Tokenized Securities Will Reshape the U.S. Stock Trading Ecosystem

Author: Aki Wu on Blockchain On September 8, 2025, Nasdaq submitted a landmark proposal to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), seeking to amend its exchange rules to allow tokenized securities to be traded on its market. This means that Nasdaq-listed US stocks like Apple and Amazon could potentially be listed, traded, and settled on Nasdaq in the form of blockchain tokens. If approved, this proposal would be the first time a major US stock exchange has permitted tokenized stock trading, marking the first large-scale introduction of blockchain technology into the core markets of Wall Street. This article will systematically review the key points of Nasdaq's proposal, the motivations behind it, the potential market shifts it could bring, its impact on the "US stock blockchain" initiative and related sectors, and explore the potential development paths for this innovative initiative. Proposal Highlights: Detailed Explanation of Nasdaq Trading Rules Amendments The core of Nasdaq's 19b-4 Rule amendments submitted to the SEC is to allow member brokerages and investors to choose to trade and settle Nasdaq-listed equity securities and exchange-traded products (ETPs) in tokenized form. Specifically, the rule amendments include the following: 1. Expanding the definition of “securities” to include tokenized forms of securities in Equity 1, Section 1 The proposal first amended the exchange’s definition of “securities,” emphasizing that “tokenized securities are still securities,” rejecting the “isolated” trading model that is decoupled from the main market and expanding it to include two forms: Traditional form: This refers to a digital record of asset ownership and rights, but does not utilize distributed ledgers or blockchain technology. This refers to the electronic record-keeping method currently used in US stocks, which essentially still corresponds to the electronic registration of paper securities. Tokenization: This refers to the digital representation of asset ownership and rights, recorded and transferred using blockchain (distributed ledger) technology. Simply put, the rights associated with a stock are issued on the blockchain and represented as tokens. Nasdaq explicitly stipulates that a tokenized security is considered an equivalent security and can be traded on the same order book as its traditional counterpart only if it is fully homogeneous. This means that the token must be fungible with traditional shares, share the same CUSIP (Uniform Securities Identification Number), and confer upon the holder the same substantive rights and privileges as traditional shares—including rights to equity returns, dividends, voting rights, and the right to distribute residual assets upon liquidation. If the tokenized security does not confer the same rights as the original share (e.g., no voting rights, no shareholder equity), or does not share the same CUSIP, the exchange will not treat it as equivalent to the traditional security and will instead treat it as a different product, such as a derivative or American Depositary Receipt (ADR). Because of this high standard, most so-called "tokenized stocks" currently on the market, such as Robinhood "Stock Tokens" and Xstocks, do not actually meet the above conditions. At best, they are just shadow tokens that reflect stock prices, do not represent real equity, and usually do not confer voting rights; dividends are mostly reflected in the form of reinvestment or cash equivalents; the legal relationship is mostly directed to the SPV or issuing vehicle rather than the listed company itself, and most products are mainly redeemed in cash. Direct "exchange for original shares" will be subject to custody and compliance restrictions. 2. Unified matching and distributed settlement: trading and clearing mechanism Equity 4, Rule 4757 Nasdaq plans to fully integrate tokenized securities with traditional securities at the trading level. The proposal stipulates that as long as the tokenized version of a stock meets the aforementioned homogeneity requirements, it will share the same order book as traditional stocks and be matched according to the same order matching and priority rules. In other words, the exchange's matching engine will treat tokenized and non-tokenized buy and sell orders equally. Indeed, Nasdaq emphasizes that "at the trading stage, there is no difference between the two; the fundamental trade execution process is identical." Equity 4, Rule 4756、4758 The difference lies in the settlement process. Currently, U.S. stock transactions are typically cleared and settled through the Depository Trust Company (DTC). By introducing tokenization, Nasdaq will offer trading participants a new option: they can use tokens for settlement. The specific process is as follows: When brokers enter orders with the exchange, they can choose to specify that they wish to have their orders settled in tokens. If the order is executed and marked as token-settled, Nasdaq will pass the clearing instructions for the trade to DTC, which will then execute the security transfer in the background via blockchain. DTC will register stock ownership as on-chain tokens based on its own business rules and systems (including its currently developing blockchain settlement platform). The entire process will be transparent to front-end investors. Trades will still be matched on Nasdaq, but clearing and settlement will shift from traditional electronic bookkeeping to blockchain-based registration. Ultimately, the shares will be held as tokens on-chain. It's worth noting that Nasdaq's move isn't about creating a new market from scratch. Instead, it's leveraging existing market infrastructure, introducing blockchain as the underlying record-keeping technology without altering front-end trading mechanisms. This ensures that traditional stocks and tokenized shares maintain unified prices during trading, share market depth and liquidity, and maintain consistent information transparency and risk management. As Nasdaq explains in its filing, this plan aims to prevent different versions of tokenized shares from operating independently on multiple blockchains, fragmenting liquidity and ensuring that core mechanisms of the national market system, such as price discovery and best execution, are not impacted. This approach addresses the pain points of tokenized shares, including the lack of liquidity caused by the fragmentation of market-making capital and order books, resulting from multiple chains (ETH/SOL, etc.), multiple markets (regulated on-exchange trading versus crypto exchanges/DEXs), and geographical compliance restrictions. 3. Trading hours: 24/7 trading is not currently available Since their launch, tokenized stocks have been plagued by issues of deep liquidity and high impact during US stock market holidays. This misalignment in trading hours has also contributed to insufficient liquidity and price decoupling. Consequently, many investors are concerned about whether tokenized stocks can transcend existing US stock market trading hours and achieve 24/7 trading. Nasdaq's proposal offers a cautious answer: at this stage, tokenized securities will only be traded during existing trading hours, with no extensions or breaks in trading hours. Tokenized stocks cannot be traded outside of regular or extended trading hours, and will continue to follow US stock market practices, trading only during regular trading hours (9:30–16:00) and pre- and post-market hours, Monday through Friday, Eastern Time. Weekend or late-night trading is not currently supported. 4. Implementation path of on-chain settlement Nasdaq's tokenized stock trading relies on the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTC), a core clearinghouse in traditional financial markets. Notably, DTC has been exploring distributed ledger technology (DLT) clearing in recent years. Its "Project Ion" is a blockchain-based stock settlement platform designed to achieve T+0 and even real-time delivery. According to public information, Project Ion launched in a parallel pilot environment in 2022 and processes settlement instructions for over 100,000 stock trades daily. DTC developed the platform in collaboration with enterprise blockchain technology provider R3, using R3's Corda distributed ledger software and building a private permissioned blockchain as its underlying architecture. This network is a non-public consortium blockchain. This suggests that Nasdaq's tokenized transactions are more likely to be run on DTC's permissioned blockchain platform, rather than on public blockchains such as Ethereum, which have been widely discussed in the community. This would allow DTC to maintain its legacy system as the authoritative record, running it in parallel with the new DLT system to ensure security redundancy. Therefore, under Nasdaq's proposal, on-chain settlement would likely occur within a controlled "consortium blockchain" environment, with nodes maintained by financial infrastructure operators such as DTC. This ensures transaction privacy, network reliability, and regulatory control, meeting Wall Street's high standards for trade settlement systems. Consortium blockchains allow participants to undergo access control, ensuring greater control over data privacy and transaction speed, thus complying with regulatory requirements. Therefore, it is foreseeable that records of Nasdaq's tokenized shares will not appear on public blockchain explorers, but will instead be stored in a distributed ledger jointly maintained by Nasdaq, DTC, and related custodians. While Nasdaq has not specified the specifics of how its smart contracts will be deployed in its public documents, it is clear that Nasdaq does not intend to introduce a completely open token trading environment. Instead, it intends to utilize blockchain technology as a "behind-the-scenes" tool to enhance efficiency, while front-end transactions will still occur within a controlled system. The only change is to use blockchain records for bookkeeping. This means that investors will hold on-chain records approved by regulators, rather than crypto tokens that circulate freely outside the traditional system. Why did Nasdaq apply for tokenized securities? Blockchain has enormous potential to improve the efficiency of financial market infrastructure. Currently, US stock trades are settled on a delayed basis (T+1) (or T+2 in some markets). Blockchain technology can achieve near-real-time settlement (T+0 or even within seconds), reducing the time it takes for funds and securities to be held, and mitigating counterparty risk. Furthermore, blockchain's transparent and immutable distributed ledger provides a comprehensive audit trail, reducing reconciliation and manual errors. Nasdaq hopes to introduce tokenized settlement to expedite post-trade processes while reducing costs in clearing and custody. This is an attempt to revolutionize securities settlement mechanisms from the ground up. Nasdaq stated in its filing: "Today, securities, including stocks, have evolved from paper to electronic records, and tokenization is simply another method of digitally representing assets." By embracing blockchain, exchanges have demonstrated their determination to promote financial technology innovation so as not to fall behind in the new wave of technology. It is expected that the scale of the asset tokenization market is experiencing explosive growth, and the total market value of global tokenized assets will soar from approximately US$2.1 trillion in 2024 to approximately US$41.9 trillion in 2032, with a compound annual growth rate of 45.8%. Consequently, investors and issuers are showing strong interest in security tokenization, which represents a significant emerging market opportunity. Regulators and market participants in many countries are actively exploring the potential of blockchain-based securities, and the US cannot afford to lag behind. As a market organizer, Nasdaq hopes to capitalize on this trend, offering clients new trading options and thereby attracting more capital to the US market. By taking an early approach, Nasdaq can solidify its competitiveness in the digital asset era, especially as the White House actively promotes crypto-asset innovation and fosters a digital asset-friendly regulatory environment. It is crucial to ensure that tokenized securities develop within a compliant framework and prevent market fragmentation. As mentioned earlier, many tokenized stocks are currently traded on unregulated offshore platforms, lacking investor protections. Different platforms operate independently, leading to fragmented liquidity and market opacity. Nasdaq's proposal aims to incorporate these innovations into the mainstream regulatory system, thereby preventing investors from being drawn into unregulated markets by chasing novel concepts. While exchanges won't aggressively open up dazzling features in the short term, in the long term, stock tokenization opens up new possibilities for financial innovation. For example, stocks can be used as on-chain collateral in decentralized finance (DeFi), and equity tokens can be programmatically integrated into smart contracts to automate dividends, voting, and even the creation of entirely new derivatives and index products. These scenarios, difficult to achieve under traditional architectures, are expected to gradually become possible with tokenization. However, it's important to note that Nasdaq's tokenized securities trading venue remains on Nasdaq, meaning it's brokered within a compliant, centralized environment. This doesn't mean anyone can trade anonymously and freely on-chain. Conclusion: Long-term opportunities and industry outlook Nasdaq's promotion of tokenized securities trading is undoubtedly a major innovation in the underlying technology of securities trading. It marks a crucial step for traditional financial markets towards the blockchain era. From regulatory approval to technological preparation, this transformation will not be achieved overnight. According to Nasdaq's application documents, the relevant blockchain settlement infrastructure may not be ready until the end of the third quarter of 2026. Nasdaq anticipates that, assuming the proposal is approved by the SEC and the DTC's distributed ledger settlement system is launched, US investors could expect to see the first securities transactions settled in token form by the end of the third quarter of 2026. Investors need to recognize that this is a long-term theme. The GENIUS Act ushers in a new era of stablecoin compliance, and Nasdaq tokenized securities could become the next game-changing milestone. In the coming years, policy advancements and technological milestones related to this theme will continue to be a market focus, fostering cyclical investment opportunities in sectors such as oracles and RWAs. As Nasdaq management has stated, innovation should occur within national market systems to protect investors, not in the unregulated offshore wilderness. As Nasdaq tokenized stocks gradually launch, it will unlock greater potential for institutional capital to participate in on-chain equities. For example, large institutions can obtain real stock tokens through official channels and then confidently invest them in DeFi to generate returns. This represents a high level of capital that shadow token platforms currently struggle to attract. For the average user, once sovereign-level exchanges offer compliant stock tokens, holding shadow versions without shareholder rights becomes unnecessary. While the prospects are promising, potential limitations must be addressed. First, in the initial stages, the direct benefits for average investors may be limited. Currently, US retail investors can easily trade stocks through brokerages, and Nasdaq's tokenization will not immediately significantly reduce their trading costs or barriers to entry. While benefits such as 24/7 trading are not necessarily desirable for non-professional investors, they may not want to be constantly trading and experiencing volatility. Smart contracts are also subject to the risk of vulnerabilities and hacking, and if problems arise with tokenized stock contracts, it remains unclear who will bear liability. Furthermore, significant price deviations have been observed in some unregulated tokenized stock transactions abroad, exposing issues of insufficient liquidity and potential manipulation. Under Nasdaq's proposal, these deviations are expected to be reduced because the tokens are backed by real stocks and traditional market makers participate in pricing. Nasdaq's tokenized stock trading will mark a major milestone in the commercial application of blockchain technology. It signifies that blockchain is no longer confined to the cryptocurrency world, but has truly entered the core landscape of mainstream finance. From an industry perspective, this is an authoritative endorsement of the blockchain and Web3 ecosystem, inspiring more companies and developers to invest in this field. From a financial history perspective, this event may be seen as the starting point for the digital transformation of the traditional securities market, similar to the transition of exchanges from paper-based trading to electronic trading decades ago. For the Web3 community, this is an opportunity to put ideals into practice: concepts like decentralization and tokenization can only unlock their greatest value when integrated with the real economy. While this may not be the most utopian outcome for purist decentralization enthusiasts, it has significantly advanced the process of large-scale blockchain adoption.
Condividi
PANews2025/09/18 13:00