The post Schwartz: Ripple Doesn’t Control Consensus appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Why XRP is not used for consensus  The best incentive is no incentive The post Schwartz: Ripple Doesn’t Control Consensus appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Why XRP is not used for consensus  The best incentive is no incentive 

Schwartz: Ripple Doesn’t Control Consensus

2026/05/13 13:47
2분 읽기
이 콘텐츠에 대한 의견이나 우려 사항이 있으시면 [email protected]으로 연락주시기 바랍니다
  • Why XRP is not used for consensus 
  • The best incentive is no incentive 

Ripple Chief Technology Officer Emeritus David Schwartz has stepped in to clarify persistent misconceptions about the inner workings of the XRP Ledger (XRPL). 

He has detailed why the network’s native token is not used to secure the blockchain.

Why XRP is not used for consensus 

An X user questioned a previous statement made by Schwartz comparing proof of work (PoW), proof of stake (PoS), and the XRPL. 

Schwartz: Ripple Doesn’t Control Consensus

Bitcoin (BTC), XRP, Shiba Inu (SHIB), Toncoin (TON) and Zcash (ZEC) Price Analysis for May 13: Hiding Explosive Volatility Potential

Schwartz had previously noted the XRPL relies on “stakeholder chosen scarcity.” For comparison, PoW uses computing power, and PoS uses the value of a native token.

The user asked whether XRP itself was the asset “chosen” to be scarce in this model. 

Schwartz was quick to explain that the token plays no role in consensus, and there are two main reasons why this is the case. 

You Might Also Like

First of all, when the XRPL was being developed, Proof of Stake “hadn’t been invented yet, and we weren’t clever enough to think of it.”

More importantly, as Schwartz has noted, using XRP to drive the consensus mechanism “would have left Ripple in control of the consensus mechanism whether people wanted that or not.”

The XRPL relies on what Schwartz calls “shareholder choice.” Network participants choose to come to a consensus with validators they believe are doing a good job.

The best incentive is no incentive 

In his 2020 lecture, Schwartz argued that artificial financial rewards actually harm the network’s actual users. He noted that the primary technical hurdle is that “eventual consistency is needed for blockchains to be useful,” but argued that paying exorbitant fees to solve this problem is inefficient.

Schwartz fundamentally views built-in mining or staking rewards as a net negative: “artificial incentives are attacks on the natural stakeholders, and they represent friction left in the system.” 

As he explained, “natural incentives decentralize the only reason to participate in the system is because you want the system to work reliably there is nothing for you to take from the system.”

Source: https://u.today/schwartz-ripple-doesnt-control-consensus

시장 기회
리플 로고
리플 가격(XRP)
$1.3543
$1.3543$1.3543
-0.95%
USD
리플 (XRP) 실시간 가격 차트
면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, [email protected]으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.

No Chart Skills? Still Profit

No Chart Skills? Still ProfitNo Chart Skills? Still Profit

Copy top traders in 3s with auto trading!