An attacker drained $11.58 million from the Verus-Ethereum cross-chain bridge on May 18, 2026, by submitting a forged transfer message that passed the bridge’sAn attacker drained $11.58 million from the Verus-Ethereum cross-chain bridge on May 18, 2026, by submitting a forged transfer message that passed the bridge’s

Verus-Ethereum Bridge Hacked for $11.58M in Forged-Transfer Exploit

2026/05/18 19:27
4분 읽기
이 콘텐츠에 대한 의견이나 우려 사항이 있으시면 [email protected]으로 연락주시기 바랍니다
Verus-Ethereum Bridge Hacked for .58M in Forged-Transfer Exploit

An attacker drained $11.58 million from the Verus-Ethereum cross-chain bridge on May 18, 2026, by submitting a forged transfer message that passed the bridge’s verification checks while depositing nearly zero real value.

The exploit, first flagged by on-chain security firm Blockaid, targeted a gap between what the bridge’s smart contracts proved and what they actually paid out. 

The attack exposed a class of vulnerability that security researchers say has cost the broader DeFi sector hundreds of millions of dollars since 2022.

How a $10 Transaction Drained $11.58 Million

The attacker spent approximately $10 in VRSC fees. For that cost, they received $11.58 million in return.

Blockaid described the root cause as “a missing source-amount validation in checkCCEValues,” saying it was not an ECDSA bypass, not a notary key compromise, and not a parser or hash-binding bug. 

In plain terms: the bridge verified signatures correctly but never confirmed that the source-chain transaction actually locked matching funds.

The attacker built a transaction committing to a payout blob with empty source-side totals. Verus accepted it as legitimate. 

Eight of fifteen notaries cryptographically signed the resulting state root. 

The attacker then submitted that signed proof to the Ethereum bridge contract via submitImports(). 

The bridge verified the proof, decoded the blob, and paid out $11.58 million from its reserves.

Security firm ExVul reached the same conclusion, saying the attacker used a “forged cross-chain import payload” that passed the bridge’s verification flow and triggered three separate transfers to a drainer wallet.

Blockaid said the incident resembles the $190 million Nomad Bridge exploit and the $325 million Wormhole exploit from 2022, where fraudulent transfer instructions tricked protocols into releasing reserve funds.

What Was Taken and Where the Funds Went

PeckShield reported the bridge lost 103.6 tBTC, 1,625 ETH, and 147,000 USDC. The attacker quickly swapped the stolen assets into approximately 5,402 ETH, valued at roughly $11.4 million at current market prices.

PeckShield also revealed that the attacker’s wallet was initially funded through Tornado Cash, the crypto mixing service often associated with anonymous transactions. 

That funding occurred approximately 14 hours before the drain. 

The stolen funds remain parked at address 0x65Cb8b128Bf6e690761044CCECA422bb239C25F9, according to on-chain data.

At the time of publication, the Verus team had not publicly confirmed the exploit. Cointelegraph said it reached out to the protocol without receiving a response.

Eighth Bridge Hack of 2026 as DeFi Losses Pile Up

The Verus incident did not arrive in isolation.

THORChain confirmed a separate $10 million exploit just three days before the Verus attack, adding to mounting concerns about bridge and interoperability infrastructure across the DeFi sector.

The Verus exploit is the eighth incident involving bridge platforms in 2026. Attackers targeting bridges have made off with at least $328 million this year, according to PeckShield.

April 2026 set the year’s benchmark, with protocols losing more than $606 million across 12 incidents. The KelpDAO bridge drain accounted for $292 million, making it 2026’s largest single hack to date.

Blockaid said the fix for the Verus vulnerability would require approximately ten lines of Solidity code inside the checkCCEValues function. ExVul added broader recommendations: bridges should add strict payload-to-execution validation, layered verification around proof checks, and emergency pause mechanisms for unusual outbound transfers.

Verus’s native token VRSC showed little reaction to the news. Data from CoinGecko shows it was largely flat on the day of the hack, though it has lost close to 73% of its value over the past year.

What Comes Next

  • Recovery and reimbursement: Verus-Ethereum Bridge users await information from the project team about potential reimbursements, recovery efforts, and upcoming security measures. No timeline has been announced.
  • Stolen funds tracking: The consolidated 5,402 ETH wallet remains publicly visible on Etherscan. Law enforcement or exchange cooperation could freeze assets if the attacker attempts to cash out.

Bridge security reform: Blockaid’s technical report, published May 18, 2026, outlines the specific Solidity fix needed to close the checkCCEValues gap.

시장 기회
CROSS 로고
CROSS 가격(CROSS)
$0.09275
$0.09275$0.09275
-2.03%
USD
CROSS (CROSS) 실시간 가격 차트
면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우, [email protected]으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.

No Chart Skills? Still Profit

No Chart Skills? Still ProfitNo Chart Skills? Still Profit

Copy top traders in 3s with auto trading!