HSBC's recent analysis suggests US crypto market structure legislation will probably advance, despite Coinbase withdrawing its backing. Although CEO Brian Armstrong stated he'd "prefer no bill over accepting a flawed one," analysts believe he may yet embrace a sensible middle ground. This legislation is crucial because it delivers the regulatory certainty institutions require before committing capital. The bill's core objective is ending "regulation by enforcement" in America—clearly separating SEC jurisdiction over securities from CFTC authority over commodities. Such distinction creates a workable legal structure enabling hedge funds and corporate investors to participate confidently. Therefore, industry leaders like Ripple continue advocating for "clarity instead of confusion," while substantial Fairshake PAC funding helps drive momentum. Even an imperfect current draft likely beats whatever might emerge under future political shifts. Should comprehensive agreement prove elusive, the Senate Agriculture Committee's standalone version could still pass, thereby strengthening market integrity through enhanced CFTC supervision.
PANews reported on January 29th, citing CoinDesk, that HSBC analysis indicates that despite Coinbase withdrawing its support, the legislative process for the US crypto market structure bill will not be stalled. The analysis suggests that while Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has stated he would "rather have no bill than accept a bad one," he may still accept a reasonable compromise. The report emphasizes that legislation is crucial for providing the stability needed for institutional entry. The core of the bill aims to end the long-standing practice of "regulation through enforcement" in the US, clarifying the SEC's regulatory authority over securities and the CFTC's over commodities, laying the legal foundation for large-scale entry of institutional investors such as hedge funds and corporate funds into the market.
Analysts point out that industry leaders like Ripple continue to advocate for "clarity over confusion," while significant funding from the Fairshake PAC is also driving the legislative process. Even if the current draft is imperfect, it may be more advantageous than versions that emerge under different political circumstances. If a comprehensive agreement ultimately fails, the Senate Agriculture Committee's version may still pass first, thereby enhancing market integrity through CFTC regulation.
면책 조항: 본 사이트에 재게시된 글들은 공개 플랫폼에서 가져온 것으로 정보 제공 목적으로만 제공됩니다. 이는 반드시 MEXC의 견해를 반영하는 것은 아닙니다. 모든 권리는 원저자에게 있습니다. 제3자의 권리를 침해하는 콘텐츠가 있다고 판단될 경우,
[email protected]으로 연락하여 삭제 요청을 해주시기 바랍니다. MEXC는 콘텐츠의 정확성, 완전성 또는 시의적절성에 대해 어떠한 보증도 하지 않으며, 제공된 정보에 기반하여 취해진 어떠한 조치에 대해서도 책임을 지지 않습니다. 본 콘텐츠는 금융, 법률 또는 기타 전문적인 조언을 구성하지 않으며, MEXC의 추천이나 보증으로 간주되어서는 안 됩니다.