Both tools charge exactly the same for their main paid plan.
Twenty dollars a month, either way.
So the honest answer to "which is cheaper" depends entirely on what you do with it.
A writer, a developer, and someone wiring an API into a product will get three different answers out of the same two price lists.
Key Takeaways
Claude Pro and ChatGPT Plus both cost $20 a month, and both companies sell $100 and $200 tiers above that, so the sticker price settles nothing.
Claude is cheaper across a full year at $17 a month on annual billing, because ChatGPT Plus is sold monthly only.
ChatGPT is cheaper at the entry point, with an $8 Go plan that Claude has no equivalent for.
Claude includes its coding agent in every paid plan, while ChatGPT gates Codex access by tier.
On the API the two flagships cost the same, and OpenAI's small model is five times cheaper per input token.
The two sides meter usage differently, so what you actually spend depends on whether your work is plain text or leans on tools, reasoning and code.
Claude and ChatGPT run near-identical price ladders.
Both charge $20 a month for their main consumer plan, and both sell higher tiers at $100 and $200.
Two real gaps separate them: ChatGPT sells a plan below $20, and Claude discounts its $20 plan to $17 if you pay for a year.
Plan level | Claude | ChatGPT |
Free | $0 | $0, ad-supported in the US |
Entry paid | no plan at this level | Go, $8/mo |
Main plan | Pro, $20/mo, or $17/mo billed annually at $200 up front | Plus, $20/mo, monthly billing only |
Power tier | Max, from $100/mo, 5x or 20x Pro usage | Pro, from $100/mo, 5x or 20x Plus usage |
Small team | Team, $20/seat/mo annually, $25 monthly | |
Large org | Enterprise, from $20/seat annually with usage billed on top | Enterprise, custom |
The $100 and $200 rungs line up on both sides, and in both cases they are sold as usage multipliers rather than as different products.
On the Claude side those are usage multipliers on the main plan, sold as 5x or 20x more use than Pro.
On the ChatGPT side the same two rungs are sold as 5x and 20x more usage than Plus, with the top tier adding its own reasoning model.
These prices move, so treat the date as part of the figure.
A subscription does not buy the same thing on each side.
It buys an allowance, and the two companies build their allowances differently.
ChatGPT's pricing page lists everyday text chats as unlimited on every consumer tier, subject to abuse guardrails, and puts its published caps on specific things instead: reasoning models, uploads, image creation, voice and Codex.
Claude does not publish a fixed message count at all.
One detail there matters more than any price on this page.
On Claude, everything draws from the same pool: web, desktop, mobile, and the coding agent.
So a developer and a writer on the same $20 plan are not buying the same amount of usable work.
When you hit the wall, the options differ too.
On Claude you wait for the window to reset, upgrade, or switch on usage credits that bill at standard API rates.
On ChatGPT the everyday chat keeps running, and what stops is the specific capped feature you were using.
The practical read: if your work is plain back-and-forth text, ChatGPT's unlimited framing removes the ceiling; if it leans on tools, reasoning or code, both sides put a ceiling back and you have to know which one you will hit.
For plain writing and chat, ChatGPT is cheaper if you want to spend as little as possible, and Claude is cheaper if you are committing for a year.
At the $20 monthly rate they cost the same, and at that point price stops being the deciding factor.
The annual gap is easy to price out.
Claude Pro billed annually is $200 up front, which the pricing page presents as $17 a month.
Twelve months of each: $200 against $240.
A $40 difference, and only if you are willing to pay a year ahead and stop shopping.
Below $20 the comparison stops being a comparison.
Claude has no plan between free and $20, and its pricing page mentions ads on no tier at all.
That is the clearest trade-off on the whole ladder: ChatGPT gives you a cheaper rung, and the ads are the price of it.
For coding, Claude's entry paid plan includes more.
At $20 both give you a coding agent.
Below $20, only ChatGPT has a paid option, and it is the restricted one.
Then the shared pool comes back and changes the math.
A heavy coding week on Claude consumes the same allowance your writing does, so the plan costs a developer more in practice than it costs a writer, at an identical price.
This is why developers are the group most likely to need a $100 tier on either side.
For them the real question is not which $20 plan is cheaper.
It is which $100 tier survives a full working week without a reset, and that depends on your own workload rather than on any price table.
On the API the answer splits by model size.
The flagships cost exactly the same, the mid tier is nearly a tie, and the small model is where the gap opens.
Tier | Anthropic, in / out per 1M tokens | OpenAI, in / out per 1M tokens |
Flagship | Fable 5.1, $10 / $50 | GPT-6 Astra, $10 / $50 |
Upper mid | Opus 5, $5 / $25 | GPT-5.6 Sol, $4 / $20 |
Mid | Sonnet 5, $2 / $10 | GPT-5.6 Terra, $2 / $12 |
Small | Haiku 4.5, $1 / $5 | GPT-5.6 Luna, $0.20 / $1.20 |
A high-volume job on a small model is five times cheaper per input token on OpenAI, which is a real decision rather than a rounding difference.
Here is what the spec tables leave out.
Both companies cut those rates hard for two specific patterns.
Cached input is cheaper again: Anthropic reads from cache at a tenth of its base input rate or less depending on the model, and OpenAI discounts cached input by roughly ninety percent.
If your application sends the same long prompt over and over, caching will move your bill more than your choice of vendor does.
A worked example, using only the published rates above.
Say a job sends one million input tokens and two hundred thousand output tokens a month on the mid-tier model.
On Sonnet 5 that is $2 plus $2, so $4.
On GPT-5.6 Terra it is $2 plus $2.40, so $4.40.
Run the same job through either batch API and both halve.
At that scale the vendor choice is worth forty cents and the batch decision is worth more than two dollars.
Every figure in this article is the US dollar price shown on each company's own pricing page.
Both companies sell in many countries, and the number at checkout can differ from the US figure once local currency and local tax are applied.
Neither company's main pricing page carries a country-by-country price table.
So if you are searching for the Claude Pro price in India against the USA, or any other pair of countries, the reliable answer is not a figure someone else reposted.
Open the official pricing page from your own region and read the number there, then check whether tax is included before you compare it to the US rate.
Treat the US price as the reference point rather than a guarantee.
Five profiles, and what each choice costs you.
A few questions a week. Neither paid plan. Both free tiers handle this, and the difference that will actually reach you is that one shows ads in the US and the other does not.
Light but regular use on a tight budget. ChatGPT Go at $8 is the cheapest paid option either company sells. You accept ads where they are running, and a lower ceiling.
Serious writing or research, willing to commit. Claude Pro at $17 a month annually. You pay $200 up front, so check the cancellation and refund terms before you commit to a year.
Coding. Both $20 plans include a coding agent, and on Claude it is the same agent the higher tiers get, just with less usage. On Claude your coding usage competes with everything else you do in the same account.
Building a product. Neither subscription. Go to the API, where the model tier decides the bill and batching decides it again.
Stated fairly, each side has a genuine price argument.
ChatGPT's is that it owns both ends: the only rung below $20 and the cheaper small model of the two.
Claude's is that its $20 plan discounts to $17 and hands you the coding agent without an upgrade.
And if you want both, the honest number is $40 a month at the $20 tier on each side, or $25 if you pair Claude Pro annual with ChatGPT Go.
Consumer pricing is one of the few public windows into two companies that have not yet reported earnings to public shareholders.
Read the ladders as signals rather than as shopping information.
An annual discount is how a subscription business trades revenue per month for predictability.
A sub-$20 ad-supported tier adds a revenue line that is not subscriptions at all.
The most revealing item is not on the consumer pages.
A company that cancels a planned price rise on its mid-tier model, the one priced for high-volume work, is saying something about inference costs, competitive pressure, or both.
That is the kind of detail worth more than a feature table if you are looking at these two as businesses rather than as tools.
Is Claude cheaper than ChatGPT?
Not at the main $20 tier, where they match, but Claude is cheaper over a year at $17 a month and ChatGPT is cheaper at its $8 entry plan.
Does the $20 plan offer annual billing on both sides?
No, only Claude discounts its $20 plan for annual payment; ChatGPT Plus is monthly only.
What is the cheapest paid plan from either company?
ChatGPT Go at $8 a month, with no Claude equivalent at that level.
Is the coding agent included at the entry paid tier?
On Claude yes, in every paid plan; on ChatGPT, Codex is limited on Go and included from Plus upward.
What happened to Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude 3 Opus pricing?
Neither appears on Anthropic's current API price list, so the comparable current models are Sonnet 5 at $2 and $10 and Opus 5 at $5 and $25.
Is there a student discount?
Neither company's consumer pricing page lists an individual student rate, though both run separate institution-level education programs.
Is it worth paying for both?
That is $40 a month at the $20 tier on each side, or $25 pairing Claude Pro annual with ChatGPT Go, which some people do to keep a second opinion available.
Which is cheaper for API use?
They tie at the flagship level, Anthropic is slightly cheaper on mid-tier output, and OpenAI is five times cheaper on small-model input.
Does the price differ between India and the United States?
Possibly, because both companies apply local currency and tax at checkout, so read the price on the official page for your own region.
The sticker price is the smallest variable in what either of these actually costs you.
Two plans at the same $20 can produce very different bills once annual billing, bundled tools, and allowance limits enter the picture.
Work out which of those three applies to your week, then check the number on the company's own page before you subscribe.