The post Musk’s xAI sues OpenAI for trade secret theft appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Elon Musk’s xAI filed a lawsuit on Wednesday against OpenAI in California federal court for allegedly stealing its trade secrets. The artificial startup accused OpenAI of trying to gain an unfair advantage in the race to develop AI technology. According to the lawsuit, xAI said OpenAI tended to hire away its employees to gain access to trade secrets related to its AI chatbot Grok. xAI alleged that Sam Altman’s firm targeted employees with access to xAI’s source code and its operational advantages in launching data centers. Court bars former xAI employee from sharing trade secrets with OpenAI Elon Musk confirmed a former xAI engineer joined OpenAI, uploaded xAI’s entire codebase, and is now sued for stealing Grok trade secrets after selling $7M in stock pic.twitter.com/3X4VlIBMcJ — Dima Zeniuk (@DimaZeniuk) August 30, 2025 The lawsuit also revealed that OpenAI induced those employees to breach their confidentiality and other obligations to xAI through unlawful means. xAI found out about the alleged campaign by OpenAI while investigating allegations of trade secret theft against former engineer Xuechen Li.  xAI had accused the former employee of taking confidential information to OpenAI in a separate lawsuit. Musk’s AI company got a court order earlier this month that temporarily blocked Li from working or even communicating about AI tech with his new employer. On September 4, U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting Li from indulging in OpenAI’s generative AI. According to the lawsuit, xAI revealed that Li began working at Musk’s company last year and was involved in training and developing its chatbot Grok. The lawsuit further disclosed that the former employee took Grok’s trade secrets in July after accepting a job at OpenAI and sold $7 million in xAI stock. The new lawsuit alleged that the trade secrets… The post Musk’s xAI sues OpenAI for trade secret theft appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Elon Musk’s xAI filed a lawsuit on Wednesday against OpenAI in California federal court for allegedly stealing its trade secrets. The artificial startup accused OpenAI of trying to gain an unfair advantage in the race to develop AI technology. According to the lawsuit, xAI said OpenAI tended to hire away its employees to gain access to trade secrets related to its AI chatbot Grok. xAI alleged that Sam Altman’s firm targeted employees with access to xAI’s source code and its operational advantages in launching data centers. Court bars former xAI employee from sharing trade secrets with OpenAI Elon Musk confirmed a former xAI engineer joined OpenAI, uploaded xAI’s entire codebase, and is now sued for stealing Grok trade secrets after selling $7M in stock pic.twitter.com/3X4VlIBMcJ — Dima Zeniuk (@DimaZeniuk) August 30, 2025 The lawsuit also revealed that OpenAI induced those employees to breach their confidentiality and other obligations to xAI through unlawful means. xAI found out about the alleged campaign by OpenAI while investigating allegations of trade secret theft against former engineer Xuechen Li.  xAI had accused the former employee of taking confidential information to OpenAI in a separate lawsuit. Musk’s AI company got a court order earlier this month that temporarily blocked Li from working or even communicating about AI tech with his new employer. On September 4, U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting Li from indulging in OpenAI’s generative AI. According to the lawsuit, xAI revealed that Li began working at Musk’s company last year and was involved in training and developing its chatbot Grok. The lawsuit further disclosed that the former employee took Grok’s trade secrets in July after accepting a job at OpenAI and sold $7 million in xAI stock. The new lawsuit alleged that the trade secrets…

Musk’s xAI sues OpenAI for trade secret theft

Elon Musk’s xAI filed a lawsuit on Wednesday against OpenAI in California federal court for allegedly stealing its trade secrets. The artificial startup accused OpenAI of trying to gain an unfair advantage in the race to develop AI technology.

According to the lawsuit, xAI said OpenAI tended to hire away its employees to gain access to trade secrets related to its AI chatbot Grok. xAI alleged that Sam Altman’s firm targeted employees with access to xAI’s source code and its operational advantages in launching data centers.

Court bars former xAI employee from sharing trade secrets with OpenAI

The lawsuit also revealed that OpenAI induced those employees to breach their confidentiality and other obligations to xAI through unlawful means. xAI found out about the alleged campaign by OpenAI while investigating allegations of trade secret theft against former engineer Xuechen Li. 

xAI had accused the former employee of taking confidential information to OpenAI in a separate lawsuit. Musk’s AI company got a court order earlier this month that temporarily blocked Li from working or even communicating about AI tech with his new employer.

On September 4, U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting Li from indulging in OpenAI’s generative AI. According to the lawsuit, xAI revealed that Li began working at Musk’s company last year and was involved in training and developing its chatbot Grok. The lawsuit further disclosed that the former employee took Grok’s trade secrets in July after accepting a job at OpenAI and sold $7 million in xAI stock.

The new lawsuit alleged that the trade secrets could allow OpenAI to improve ChatGPT with xAI’s more innovative artificial intelligence technology and imaginative features. According to court documents, Li admitted to stealing company files and covering his tracks. 

The former employee came clean during a meeting on August 14, as the firm later found additional stolen materials on his devices that he had not disclosed. xAI sought an unspecified amount of monetary damages and a restraining order blocking Li’s move to OpenAI.

Judge Lin barred the former xAI employee from communicating about generative AI with any officer, director, employee, agent, supplier, consultant, or customer of OpenAI. The federal judge said the order will last until Musk’s company has confirmed that all of its confidential information in Li’s possession, custody, or control has been deleted. Lin set a hearing for October 7 to evaluate whether a longer order should be imposed.

xAI sues Apple and OpenAI for monopolizing the tech market

Cryptopolitan reported that xAI sued Tim Cook’s Apple in August for allegedly colluding with OpenAI illegally to monopolize the market for AI chatbots on Apple devices and suppress rival tech platforms. The lawsuit alleged that Apple had deprioritized so-called super apps and generative AI competitors in its App Store rankings, while including OpenAI’s chatbot in Apple products.

OpenAI’s spokesperson argued that the filing was consistent with Musk’s ongoing pattern of harassment. Musk had also threatened to sue Apple earlier that same month for an antitrust violation. Musk said Apple behaved in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI firm besides OpenAI to rank number one in the App Store.

Apple’s spokesperson maintained that the App Store was designed to be fair and free of bias. Altman was also separately sued by Musk for allegedly deviating from the company’s original mission to benefit humanity. 

OpenAI also countersued Musk in April for harassment. The company alleged that Musk and xAI engaged in attacks on social media and in the press, and through a bid to buy the company for $97.4 billion, to harm OpenAI’s business relationship.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It’s free.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/musks-xai-sues-openai/

Market Opportunity
Xai Logo
Xai Price(XAI)
$0.01566
$0.01566$0.01566
-0.50%
USD
Xai (XAI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Pinecone Matches INIBOX: The Ultimate Guide to High-Performance Mining

Pinecone Matches INIBOX: The Ultimate Guide to High-Performance Mining

  Introduction to Pinecone Matches INIBOX (850Mh) We present the definitive guide to the Pinecone Matches INIBOX (850Mh) — a cutting-edge cryptocurrency mining
Share
Techbullion2026/01/22 12:27
Solana Founder Reveals Three Essential Principles To Attract Capital Successfully

Solana Founder Reveals Three Essential Principles To Attract Capital Successfully

The post Solana Founder Reveals Three Essential Principles To Attract Capital Successfully appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto Projects: Solana Founder
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 11:49