Bitcoin miners can’t catch a break — and now they’re entering what the industry is grimly calling the “chill zone.” This week, hashprice — a key measure of profitability for Bitcoin miners — fell below $50 for the first time since April, according to TheMinerMag. If current projections hold, that figure could drop to below $46, a level not seen since Bitcoin traded near $90,000. It’s a cruel irony: Bitcoin sits above $110,000, yet miners are making less money than when it was $20,000 cheaper. Figures like those are near to what’s considered a worst-case scenario for miners. Already in April, the situation was dire. Back then, hashprice had fallen to $40, a level considered by TheMinerMag to be at or below break-even for many mining operations.“Most miners were looking at $40 as their bear case,” Nick Hansen, CEO of mining outlet Luxor, previously told DL News, admitting that he had spoken to many mining companies and their response was: “we’re not sure what we’re going to do.”None of this is new, however. Bitcoin mining has been dealing with a severe drain of profits for some time. There’s two reasons: the 2024 halving slashed block rewards in half, which left miners increasingly dependent on transaction fees. A lack of onchain activity, however, means those fees have all but evaporated. For instance, in September, transaction fees contributed less than 0.9% of total Bitcoin mining rewards, “continuing a trend of historically low fee activity since the halving,” wrote TheMinerMag. The situation is existential. Miners are the players that keep Bitcoin’s security afloat, and if they struggle to make money and stay online, then the entire protocol could be at stake. Three factorsThree factors determine mining profitability.One is the price of Bitcoin, second is the difficulty of mining — or how much computing power the network requires — and third is transaction fees.Right now, two of those three are working against miners. Network hashrate — the total computing power securing Bitcoin — has climbed above 1.1 zetahash per second, up 10% in just three weeks. More miners competing for the same rewards means everyone’s slice gets thinner. Another 6% difficulty increase is expected in six days, further squeezing margins, said TheMinerMag.Moreover, without fees to cushion falling subsidies, miners are trapped between rising costs and shrinking revenue.The AI pivotWhat can miners do? Well, some are switching from a pure mining play over to AI. For instance, CleanSpark, once a vocal “Bitcoin-only” miner, just expanded its credit line by $100 million explicitly to invest in high-performance computing infrastructure for AI workloads. Additionally, Cipher Mining signed a $3 billion deal with Fluidstack to convert 168 megawatts of capacity from Bitcoin to AI and cloud computing.“The dual-track mining model is fast becoming the new normal,” TheMinerMag noted.VanEck had already predicted the shift back in 2024. Assuming the 12 major publicly traded Bitcoin miners dedicate 20% of their energy capacity to AI computation by 2027, they could bump their average yearly profits to almost $14 billion.“The synergy is simple: AI companies need energy, and Bitcoin miners have it,” wrote Matthew Sigel, VanEck head of digital assets research in an August blog post.Pedro Solimano is DL News’ Buenos Aires-based markets correspondent. Got at a tip? Email him at [email protected].Bitcoin miners can’t catch a break — and now they’re entering what the industry is grimly calling the “chill zone.” This week, hashprice — a key measure of profitability for Bitcoin miners — fell below $50 for the first time since April, according to TheMinerMag. If current projections hold, that figure could drop to below $46, a level not seen since Bitcoin traded near $90,000. It’s a cruel irony: Bitcoin sits above $110,000, yet miners are making less money than when it was $20,000 cheaper. Figures like those are near to what’s considered a worst-case scenario for miners. Already in April, the situation was dire. Back then, hashprice had fallen to $40, a level considered by TheMinerMag to be at or below break-even for many mining operations.“Most miners were looking at $40 as their bear case,” Nick Hansen, CEO of mining outlet Luxor, previously told DL News, admitting that he had spoken to many mining companies and their response was: “we’re not sure what we’re going to do.”None of this is new, however. Bitcoin mining has been dealing with a severe drain of profits for some time. There’s two reasons: the 2024 halving slashed block rewards in half, which left miners increasingly dependent on transaction fees. A lack of onchain activity, however, means those fees have all but evaporated. For instance, in September, transaction fees contributed less than 0.9% of total Bitcoin mining rewards, “continuing a trend of historically low fee activity since the halving,” wrote TheMinerMag. The situation is existential. Miners are the players that keep Bitcoin’s security afloat, and if they struggle to make money and stay online, then the entire protocol could be at stake. Three factorsThree factors determine mining profitability.One is the price of Bitcoin, second is the difficulty of mining — or how much computing power the network requires — and third is transaction fees.Right now, two of those three are working against miners. Network hashrate — the total computing power securing Bitcoin — has climbed above 1.1 zetahash per second, up 10% in just three weeks. More miners competing for the same rewards means everyone’s slice gets thinner. Another 6% difficulty increase is expected in six days, further squeezing margins, said TheMinerMag.Moreover, without fees to cushion falling subsidies, miners are trapped between rising costs and shrinking revenue.The AI pivotWhat can miners do? Well, some are switching from a pure mining play over to AI. For instance, CleanSpark, once a vocal “Bitcoin-only” miner, just expanded its credit line by $100 million explicitly to invest in high-performance computing infrastructure for AI workloads. Additionally, Cipher Mining signed a $3 billion deal with Fluidstack to convert 168 megawatts of capacity from Bitcoin to AI and cloud computing.“The dual-track mining model is fast becoming the new normal,” TheMinerMag noted.VanEck had already predicted the shift back in 2024. Assuming the 12 major publicly traded Bitcoin miners dedicate 20% of their energy capacity to AI computation by 2027, they could bump their average yearly profits to almost $14 billion.“The synergy is simple: AI companies need energy, and Bitcoin miners have it,” wrote Matthew Sigel, VanEck head of digital assets research in an August blog post.Pedro Solimano is DL News’ Buenos Aires-based markets correspondent. Got at a tip? Email him at [email protected].

Bitcoin miners hit ‘chill zone’ as profitability continues to collapse

Bitcoin miners can’t catch a break — and now they’re entering what the industry is grimly calling the “chill zone.”

This week, hashprice — a key measure of profitability for Bitcoin miners — fell below $50 for the first time since April, according to TheMinerMag. If current projections hold, that figure could drop to below $46, a level not seen since Bitcoin traded near $90,000.

It’s a cruel irony: Bitcoin sits above $110,000, yet miners are making less money than when it was $20,000 cheaper.

Figures like those are near to what’s considered a worst-case scenario for miners. Already in April, the situation was dire. Back then, hashprice had fallen to $40, a level considered by TheMinerMag to be at or below break-even for many mining operations.

“Most miners were looking at $40 as their bear case,” Nick Hansen, CEO of mining outlet Luxor, previously told DL News, admitting that he had spoken to many mining companies and their response was: “we’re not sure what we’re going to do.”

None of this is new, however.

Bitcoin mining has been dealing with a severe drain of profits for some time. There’s two reasons: the 2024 halving slashed block rewards in half, which left miners increasingly dependent on transaction fees. A lack of onchain activity, however, means those fees have all but evaporated.

For instance, in September, transaction fees contributed less than 0.9% of total Bitcoin mining rewards, “continuing a trend of historically low fee activity since the halving,” wrote TheMinerMag.

The situation is existential. Miners are the players that keep Bitcoin’s security afloat, and if they struggle to make money and stay online, then the entire protocol could be at stake.

Three factors

Three factors determine mining profitability.

One is the price of Bitcoin, second is the difficulty of mining — or how much computing power the network requires — and third is transaction fees.

Right now, two of those three are working against miners.

Network hashrate — the total computing power securing Bitcoin — has climbed above 1.1 zetahash per second, up 10% in just three weeks. More miners competing for the same rewards means everyone’s slice gets thinner.

Another 6% difficulty increase is expected in six days, further squeezing margins, said TheMinerMag.

Moreover, without fees to cushion falling subsidies, miners are trapped between rising costs and shrinking revenue.

The AI pivot

What can miners do? Well, some are switching from a pure mining play over to AI.

For instance, CleanSpark, once a vocal “Bitcoin-only” miner, just expanded its credit line by $100 million explicitly to invest in high-performance computing infrastructure for AI workloads.

Additionally, Cipher Mining signed a $3 billion deal with Fluidstack to convert 168 megawatts of capacity from Bitcoin to AI and cloud computing.

“The dual-track mining model is fast becoming the new normal,” TheMinerMag noted.

VanEck had already predicted the shift back in 2024. Assuming the 12 major publicly traded Bitcoin miners dedicate 20% of their energy capacity to AI computation by 2027, they could bump their average yearly profits to almost $14 billion.

“The synergy is simple: AI companies need energy, and Bitcoin miners have it,” wrote Matthew Sigel, VanEck head of digital assets research in an August blog post.

Pedro Solimano is DL News’ Buenos Aires-based markets correspondent. Got at a tip? Email him at [email protected].

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Pinecone Matches INIBOX: The Ultimate Guide to High-Performance Mining

Pinecone Matches INIBOX: The Ultimate Guide to High-Performance Mining

  Introduction to Pinecone Matches INIBOX (850Mh) We present the definitive guide to the Pinecone Matches INIBOX (850Mh) — a cutting-edge cryptocurrency mining
Share
Techbullion2026/01/22 12:27
Solana Founder Reveals Three Essential Principles To Attract Capital Successfully

Solana Founder Reveals Three Essential Principles To Attract Capital Successfully

The post Solana Founder Reveals Three Essential Principles To Attract Capital Successfully appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Crypto Projects: Solana Founder
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 11:49