The US Senate Finance Committee will hold a high-profile hearing on October 1 to examine the taxation of crypto assets. The hearing will see industry experts, including representatives from Coinbase and Coin Center, provide testimony.The US Senate Finance Committee will hold a high-profile hearing on October 1 to examine the taxation of crypto assets. The hearing will see industry experts, including representatives from Coinbase and Coin Center, provide testimony.

US Senate Schedules Hearing To Examine Taxation Of Crypto Assets

2025/09/27 01:31
3 min read

The US Senate Finance Committee will hold a high-profile hearing on October 1 to examine the taxation of crypto assets. The hearing will see industry experts, including representatives from Coinbase and Coin Center, provide testimony.

The session is widely seen as key to shaping the future of crypto taxation in the US.

US Senate To Hold Key Hearing

The US Senate Finance Committee has scheduled a hearing to examine the topic of crypto taxation in the US. The hearing will put several tax lawyers, policy advocates, and crypto executives, including Coinbase’s VP, in the hot seat to provide testimony. Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo confirmed that the hearing, “Examining the Taxation of Digital Assets,” will be held on October 1 at the Dirksen Senate Office Building. The session will feature Jason Somensatto, Coin Center policy director, ASK Kramer Law’s Andrea Kramer, and Annette Nellen, Chair of the American Institute of CPAs’ Digital Asset Tax Task Force.

However, the spotlight will be on Coinbase's Vice President of Tax, Lawrence Zlatkin.

The Crypto Taxation Debate

The hearing comes against the backdrop of an ongoing debate about how crypto assets should be taxed. Pro-crypto Senator Cynthia Lummis introduced legislation in July to update the tax code for crypto assets. Lummis argued that existing rules are outdated and hinder innovation. The White House’s Digital Asset Working Group also submitted a report urging Congress to modify tax rules to cover digital assets. The report urged the Treasury Department and IRS to clarify grey areas of stablecoin payment transactions and whether small sums from mining, staking, and airdrops should trigger taxable events.

The CAMT Backlash

Senator Cynthia Lummis also urged the Treasury Department to address an “unintended tax burden” on digital asset companies due to a provision in the Inflation Reduction Act. The provision in question, called the corporate alternative minimum tax (CAMT), imposes a 15% minimum levy on adjusted financial statement income, including unrealised gains from digital assets. Critics have warned that the provision could force companies to pay tax on paper profits even if they don’t sell their assets. Senators Lummis and Bernie Moreno also wrote to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, arguing that the CAMT could harm US companies by forcing them to sell tokens to cover their tax liabilities.

The Senators urged Bessent to use his authority to exempt unrealized crypto gains from the calculation, aligning tax policy to reflect that gains are only realized upon the sale of the assets in question.

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37
Silver Price Crash Is Over “For Real This Time,” Analyst Predicts a Surge Back Above $90

Silver Price Crash Is Over “For Real This Time,” Analyst Predicts a Surge Back Above $90

Silver has been taking a beating lately, and the Silver price hasn’t exactly been acting like a safe haven. After running up into the highs, the whole move reversed
Share
Captainaltcoin2026/02/07 03:15