The CFTC has asked a federal court to unwind key parts of its settled case against Gemini Trust Company. The request follows an internal review that challenged the basis of the original enforcement action. The move also shifts attention to how digital asset cases were built under previous standards.
The CFTC and Gemini filed a joint motion in the Southern District of New York on May 27. The motion seeks relief from a January 2025 consent order tied to a $5 million penalty. However, the agency now says the complaint should not have been filed under current standards.

The case began in June 2022, when the CFTC accused Gemini of misleading the agency. The complaint focused on Gemini’s 2017 self-certification of bitcoin futures on Cboe Futures Exchange. It also involved questions about loans, rebates, and possible market manipulation risks.
Gemini denied wrongdoing but settled the case before trial in January 2025. The consent order included a civil monetary penalty and a permanent injunction. However, the CFTC now wants the court to vacate the order’s prospective provisions.
The CFTC said it reviewed the investigation, evidence, charging decision, and litigation tactics. The agency also considered new federal digital asset policies across several government agencies. It concluded that the original complaint failed to meet current enforcement standards.
The review found that the complaint relied heavily on a whistleblower account with credibility problems. The agency also said the case targeted Gemini, although Gemini had suffered harm in the underlying conduct. The CFTC noted serious questions about the strength of the evidence.
The agency also raised concerns about internal process failures during the case. It said requested evidence did not reach a Commissioner before the complaint vote. The CFTC said litigation tactics later limited Gemini’s access to evidence needed for its defense.
The motion does not automatically erase the settlement because a federal judge must approve relief. The CFTC and Gemini argue that continued enforcement no longer serves the agency’s mission. They also say prospective injunctions would not remain equitable after the agency’s review.
The $5 million penalty has already been paid, which limits the scope of the request. The motion focuses mainly on future obligations under the consent order. The court must now decide whether the changed record supports vacating those provisions.
The case carries wider importance for crypto enforcement and regulatory settlements. It shows how agency reviews can reshape earlier digital asset actions after policy changes. Still, the final decision rests with the Southern District of New York.
The post CFTC Seeks to Reverse $5M Gemini Penalty After Credibility Review appeared first on CoinCentral.


