The post ‘Uptober’ Is Myth for XRP, Price History Warns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Every October, the crypto community repeats the same slogan: “Uptober.” For Bitcoin, at least, it sometimes finds support in the charts. For XRP, however, the story is far more complicated. Examining more than a decade of price history, the numbers don’t justify optimism. Monthly data shows that October has produced some of XRP’s most dramatic price fluctuations. In 2013, for example, the token soared by more than 94%. In 2014, it jumped by 130%. In 2015, there was a milder 4.7% gain, and in 2017, there was only a 1.49% increase, as per CryptoRank. On the other hand, years like 2018 and 2021 delivered double-digit losses. The most explosive October was in 2020, when XRP spiked by almost 179% in just four weeks. However, these isolated events create a distorted picture. Source: CryptoRank Strip away the extremes, and the median October return is a loss of 1.79%. The average is even worse: -4.58%. This suggests that history shows October is more likely to disappoint XRP holders than reward them, despite the occasional blockbuster year that fuels the “Uptober” myth. Quarterly data reinforces this warning While Q4 has historically been the strongest period for XRP, with an average gain of nearly 88%, the median shows a loss of 4.32%. This again highlights that the results are heavily distorted by a few extraordinary runs rather than consistent seasonal strength. The pattern is clear — “Uptober” is not a reliable trading strategy for XRP. Past years prove that, while outsized rallies are possible, the typical outcome is modest or negative. Investors expecting green candles every October are relying on folklore, not probability. While history doesn’t eliminate the possibility of another upside surprise, it does emphasize the risk of treating a single month as a guarantee. Source: https://u.today/uptober-is-myth-for-xrp-price-history-warnsThe post ‘Uptober’ Is Myth for XRP, Price History Warns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Every October, the crypto community repeats the same slogan: “Uptober.” For Bitcoin, at least, it sometimes finds support in the charts. For XRP, however, the story is far more complicated. Examining more than a decade of price history, the numbers don’t justify optimism. Monthly data shows that October has produced some of XRP’s most dramatic price fluctuations. In 2013, for example, the token soared by more than 94%. In 2014, it jumped by 130%. In 2015, there was a milder 4.7% gain, and in 2017, there was only a 1.49% increase, as per CryptoRank. On the other hand, years like 2018 and 2021 delivered double-digit losses. The most explosive October was in 2020, when XRP spiked by almost 179% in just four weeks. However, these isolated events create a distorted picture. Source: CryptoRank Strip away the extremes, and the median October return is a loss of 1.79%. The average is even worse: -4.58%. This suggests that history shows October is more likely to disappoint XRP holders than reward them, despite the occasional blockbuster year that fuels the “Uptober” myth. Quarterly data reinforces this warning While Q4 has historically been the strongest period for XRP, with an average gain of nearly 88%, the median shows a loss of 4.32%. This again highlights that the results are heavily distorted by a few extraordinary runs rather than consistent seasonal strength. The pattern is clear — “Uptober” is not a reliable trading strategy for XRP. Past years prove that, while outsized rallies are possible, the typical outcome is modest or negative. Investors expecting green candles every October are relying on folklore, not probability. While history doesn’t eliminate the possibility of another upside surprise, it does emphasize the risk of treating a single month as a guarantee. Source: https://u.today/uptober-is-myth-for-xrp-price-history-warns

‘Uptober’ Is Myth for XRP, Price History Warns

Every October, the crypto community repeats the same slogan: “Uptober.” For Bitcoin, at least, it sometimes finds support in the charts. For XRP, however, the story is far more complicated. Examining more than a decade of price history, the numbers don’t justify optimism.

Monthly data shows that October has produced some of XRP’s most dramatic price fluctuations. In 2013, for example, the token soared by more than 94%. In 2014, it jumped by 130%. In 2015, there was a milder 4.7% gain, and in 2017, there was only a 1.49% increase, as per CryptoRank.

On the other hand, years like 2018 and 2021 delivered double-digit losses. The most explosive October was in 2020, when XRP spiked by almost 179% in just four weeks. However, these isolated events create a distorted picture.

Source: CryptoRank

Strip away the extremes, and the median October return is a loss of 1.79%. The average is even worse: -4.58%. This suggests that history shows October is more likely to disappoint XRP holders than reward them, despite the occasional blockbuster year that fuels the “Uptober” myth.

Quarterly data reinforces this warning

While Q4 has historically been the strongest period for XRP, with an average gain of nearly 88%, the median shows a loss of 4.32%. This again highlights that the results are heavily distorted by a few extraordinary runs rather than consistent seasonal strength.

The pattern is clear — “Uptober” is not a reliable trading strategy for XRP. Past years prove that, while outsized rallies are possible, the typical outcome is modest or negative.

Investors expecting green candles every October are relying on folklore, not probability. While history doesn’t eliminate the possibility of another upside surprise, it does emphasize the risk of treating a single month as a guarantee.

Source: https://u.today/uptober-is-myth-for-xrp-price-history-warns

Market Opportunity
Mythos Logo
Mythos Price(MYTH)
$0,0162
$0,0162$0,0162
-11,47%
USD
Mythos (MYTH) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Nasdaq-listed iPower reaches $30 million convertible note financing agreement to launch DAT strategy.

Nasdaq-listed iPower reaches $30 million convertible note financing agreement to launch DAT strategy.

PANews reported on December 23 that, according to Globenewswire, Nasdaq-listed e-commerce and supply chain platform iPower announced it has reached a $30 million
Share
PANews2025/12/23 22:19
SelectCam AI Launches Flagship AI-Powered Video Telematics Solutions for Global Fleet Safety

SelectCam AI Launches Flagship AI-Powered Video Telematics Solutions for Global Fleet Safety

SHENZHEN, China–(BUSINESS WIRE)–SelectCam AI, a China-based, product-driven technology company, today announced the launch of its flagship AI video telematics solutions
Share
AI Journal2025/12/23 21:48