The post Is the AI boom a house of cards? Deutsche Bank warns of unsustainable spending appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The AI gold rush may be keeping the U.S. economy afloat, but according to Deutsche Bank, its current trajectory looks anything but sustainable. A new research note from the German lender warns that AI capital expenditures have reached such extraordinary heights that they are single-handedly preventing the U.S. from tipping into recession. Deutsche Bank isn’t the only one that’s noticed the outsized impact AI is having on the economy. The Kobeissi Letter posted a chart by Arch Global Economies showing that software and technology investment’s contribution to U.S. real GDP growth surpassed 1 percentage point for the first time in history. It has also exceeded the previous peak reached during the dot-com bubble in 1998. AI is keeping the U.S. out of recession (Source: BEA, Arch Global Economics) “This is unprecedented… The AI boom is driving economic growth.” But with spending racing ahead of actual productivity gains, Deutsche Bank see storm clouds on the horizon. Deutsche Bank cites capex-fueled growth, not software output The scale is mind-boggling. Goldman Sachs estimates that global AI-related capex hit $368 billion between early 2023 and August 2025. Most of this money has gone into physical infrastructure, like building data centers, upgrading power supply, and installing high-grade equipment. Yet, the actual output from AI software, its promised leap in productivity and efficiency, remains limited. In fact, Deutsche Bank notes that if you strip out tech-driven spending, real GDP growth in the U.S. is hovering around 0% in 2024 and 2025. Translation? Without data centers, the economy would already be in recession. And here’s the catch: to keep contributing fresh points to GDP, the tech cycle would need to accelerate “parabolically” quarter after quarter, according to Deutsche Bank. That kind of endless upward slope is mathematically improbable, if not impossible. Instead, the current AI boom looks… The post Is the AI boom a house of cards? Deutsche Bank warns of unsustainable spending appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The AI gold rush may be keeping the U.S. economy afloat, but according to Deutsche Bank, its current trajectory looks anything but sustainable. A new research note from the German lender warns that AI capital expenditures have reached such extraordinary heights that they are single-handedly preventing the U.S. from tipping into recession. Deutsche Bank isn’t the only one that’s noticed the outsized impact AI is having on the economy. The Kobeissi Letter posted a chart by Arch Global Economies showing that software and technology investment’s contribution to U.S. real GDP growth surpassed 1 percentage point for the first time in history. It has also exceeded the previous peak reached during the dot-com bubble in 1998. AI is keeping the U.S. out of recession (Source: BEA, Arch Global Economics) “This is unprecedented… The AI boom is driving economic growth.” But with spending racing ahead of actual productivity gains, Deutsche Bank see storm clouds on the horizon. Deutsche Bank cites capex-fueled growth, not software output The scale is mind-boggling. Goldman Sachs estimates that global AI-related capex hit $368 billion between early 2023 and August 2025. Most of this money has gone into physical infrastructure, like building data centers, upgrading power supply, and installing high-grade equipment. Yet, the actual output from AI software, its promised leap in productivity and efficiency, remains limited. In fact, Deutsche Bank notes that if you strip out tech-driven spending, real GDP growth in the U.S. is hovering around 0% in 2024 and 2025. Translation? Without data centers, the economy would already be in recession. And here’s the catch: to keep contributing fresh points to GDP, the tech cycle would need to accelerate “parabolically” quarter after quarter, according to Deutsche Bank. That kind of endless upward slope is mathematically improbable, if not impossible. Instead, the current AI boom looks…

Is the AI boom a house of cards? Deutsche Bank warns of unsustainable spending

The AI gold rush may be keeping the U.S. economy afloat, but according to Deutsche Bank, its current trajectory looks anything but sustainable.

A new research note from the German lender warns that AI capital expenditures have reached such extraordinary heights that they are single-handedly preventing the U.S. from tipping into recession.

Deutsche Bank isn’t the only one that’s noticed the outsized impact AI is having on the economy. The Kobeissi Letter posted a chart by Arch Global Economies showing that software and technology investment’s contribution to U.S. real GDP growth surpassed 1 percentage point for the first time in history. It has also exceeded the previous peak reached during the dot-com bubble in 1998.

AI is keeping the U.S. out of recession (Source: BEA, Arch Global Economics)

But with spending racing ahead of actual productivity gains, Deutsche Bank see storm clouds on the horizon.

Deutsche Bank cites capex-fueled growth, not software output

The scale is mind-boggling. Goldman Sachs estimates that global AI-related capex hit $368 billion between early 2023 and August 2025. Most of this money has gone into physical infrastructure, like building data centers, upgrading power supply, and installing high-grade equipment.

Yet, the actual output from AI software, its promised leap in productivity and efficiency, remains limited. In fact, Deutsche Bank notes that if you strip out tech-driven spending, real GDP growth in the U.S. is hovering around 0% in 2024 and 2025. Translation? Without data centers, the economy would already be in recession.

And here’s the catch: to keep contributing fresh points to GDP, the tech cycle would need to accelerate “parabolically” quarter after quarter, according to Deutsche Bank. That kind of endless upward slope is mathematically improbable, if not impossible.

Instead, the current AI boom looks increasingly like a sprint: unsustainably fast, front-loaded with construction, and destined to slow once the infrastructure build-out plateaus. As tech stocks have been responsible for roughly half the S&P 500’s gains this year, the risks aren’t limited to GDP; they extend directly into financial markets.

The $800 billion shortfall

Consultancy Bain & Co. adds more fuel to the skeptics’ fire. Their estimate suggests that by 2030, the AI sector would require $2 trillion annually to fund demand for computing power. Yet even factoring in efficiency gains and cost savings, the world is still staring down an $800 billion revenue shortfall.

That gap raises the uncomfortable question: who foots the bill? If demand for AI compute doesn’t line up with revenues, the industry could face a reckoning with overcapacity and squeezed margins, eerily reminiscent of the dot-com era.

There is, however, a more measured outlook. Goldman Sachs believes AI productivity gains will eventually materialize, boosting U.S. GDP by about 0.4 percentage points per year in the near term and roughly 1.5% in the long run. While that’s not “parabolic,” it could provide a softer landing than a dramatic AI bust.

The “balanced” read, Deutsche Bank argues, is that productivity improvements are indeed coming, just not yet at a pace that justifies today’s runaway spending. In other words, AI may well transform the economy, but the timelines don’t match the feverish building spree currently underway.

For now, AI capex keeps construction workers busy, power utilities investing, and equity markets buoyant. But the longer-term question remains: is this foundation durable or does the world risk constructing a multi-trillion-dollar house of cards?

Mentioned in this article

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/is-the-ai-boom-a-house-of-cards-deutsche-bank-warns-of-unsustainable-spending/

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Gets ‘Golden’ Ticket With 2 Nominations

‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Gets ‘Golden’ Ticket With 2 Nominations

The post ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Gets ‘Golden’ Ticket With 2 Nominations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Mira (voice of May Hong), Rumi (Arden Cho) and Zoey (
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 23:28
Tron Founder Justin Sun Invests $8M in River’s Stablecoin Abstraction Technology

Tron Founder Justin Sun Invests $8M in River’s Stablecoin Abstraction Technology

Justin Sun commits $8 million to River for stablecoin abstraction deployment across Tron ecosystem, including SUN pools and JustLend integration, as RIVER token
Share
Coinstats2026/01/22 22:59