TLDR Jump Crypto proposed removing Solana’s fixed compute block limit after the upcoming Alpenglow upgrade The change would let high-performance validators process more complex blocks, creating a performance incentive system Current fixed limit of 60 million compute units would be replaced with scaling based on validator capabilities Validators with better hardware could earn more fees, [...] The post Solana Block Limit Removal Proposed by Jump Crypto After Alpenglow Upgrade appeared first on Blockonomi.TLDR Jump Crypto proposed removing Solana’s fixed compute block limit after the upcoming Alpenglow upgrade The change would let high-performance validators process more complex blocks, creating a performance incentive system Current fixed limit of 60 million compute units would be replaced with scaling based on validator capabilities Validators with better hardware could earn more fees, [...] The post Solana Block Limit Removal Proposed by Jump Crypto After Alpenglow Upgrade appeared first on Blockonomi.

Solana Block Limit Removal Proposed by Jump Crypto After Alpenglow Upgrade

TLDR

  • Jump Crypto proposed removing Solana’s fixed compute block limit after the upcoming Alpenglow upgrade
  • The change would let high-performance validators process more complex blocks, creating a performance incentive system
  • Current fixed limit of 60 million compute units would be replaced with scaling based on validator capabilities
  • Validators with better hardware could earn more fees, encouraging network-wide hardware upgrades
  • The Alpenglow upgrade, passing with near-unanimous support, will reduce transaction finality from 12.8 seconds to 150 milliseconds

Solana, one of the fastest growing blockchain networks, may soon become even faster. Jump Crypto, the Web3 infrastructure company building the Firedancer validator client for Solana, has proposed removing the blockchain’s fixed compute block limit to improve network performance and create stronger incentives for validators to upgrade their hardware.

The proposal, known as SIMD-0370, would be implemented after Solana’s upcoming Alpenglow upgrade. Alpenglow recently passed governance with near-unanimous support and is scheduled for testnet deployment in December.

Currently, Solana operates with a fixed compute unit block limit of 60 million. The new proposal would eliminate this cap, allowing block sizes to scale based on validator capabilities. This change would create what Anza, a research company spun out of Solana Labs, describes as a “performance flywheel.”

“This creates a performance flywheel: block producers pack more transactions to earn more fees. Validators that skip blocks lose rewards, so they upgrade hardware and optimize code. Better performance across the network means producers can safely push limits further,” Anza explained in a recent statement.

The Technical Mechanics

Under the proposed system, validators with suboptimal hardware would automatically skip more complex blocks. These blocks would instead be handled by better-equipped validators who could process them efficiently. The system creates natural market pressure for validators to improve their hardware or risk losing potential rewards.

The SIMD-0370 proposal follows an earlier suggestion from Jito Labs CEO Lucas Bruder. In May, Bruder proposed increasing the fixed compute block limit to 100 million compute units under SIMD-0286. The newer proposal takes a more dynamic approach by removing fixed limits entirely.

Jump Crypto’s Firedancer team, which launched on Solana mainnet in September 2024 in a limited capacity, argues that removing block limits would allow block size to scale organically with validator performance. This change would be particularly effective after the Alpenglow upgrade, which introduces a skip-vote mechanism for validators.

Potential Concerns

While many view the proposal positively, some voices have raised concerns about potential centralization risks. Engineer Akhilesh Singhania commented on GitHub that the change might favor larger validators who can afford to continuously upgrade their hardware.

Roger Wattenhofer, head of research at Anza, described himself as “a big fan of the idea of removing the compute limit completely” but acknowledged concerns about centralization and the risk of network instability from super-advanced block producers. However, he believes “all these problems are solvable.”

The proposal comes during a period of growth for Solana. The blockchain has gained popularity for its high-speed, low-fee transactions and diverse decentralized applications. Solana’s decentralized exchange trading volume has even surpassed Ethereum’s several times this year.

Solana’s past challenges with network outages during high activity periods have pushed developers to focus on upgrades that improve stability and user experience. The Alpenglow upgrade represents the most substantial change to Solana’s core protocol to date.

The upgrade will reduce transaction finality time from approximately 12.8 seconds to just 150 milliseconds, while also introducing other improvements to network resilience and data optimization.

Jump Crypto, beyond its work on Firedancer, recently joined with Galaxy Digital and Multicoin Capital to launch Forward Industries, Inc., a Solana treasury firm. The three firms led a $1.65 billion private investment in cash and stablecoin commitments, with Jump Crypto CIO Saurabh Sharma joining the board as an observer.

The post Solana Block Limit Removal Proposed by Jump Crypto After Alpenglow Upgrade appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
Blockstreet Logo
Blockstreet Price(BLOCK)
$0.011575
$0.011575$0.011575
+1.31%
USD
Blockstreet (BLOCK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

The post Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold is strutting its way into record territory, smashing through $3,700 an ounce Wednesday morning, as Sprott Asset Management strategist Paul Wong says the yellow metal may finally snatch the dollar’s most coveted role: store of value. Wong Warns: Fiscal Dominance Puts U.S. Dollar on Notice, Gold on Top Gold prices eased slightly to $3,678.9 […] Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/gold-hits-3700-as-sprotts-wong-says-dollars-store-of-value-crown-may-slip/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:33
Superstate Raises Over $82 Million to Develop Onchain Capital Markets

Superstate Raises Over $82 Million to Develop Onchain Capital Markets

Superstate announced that it has raised $82.5 million in a Series B funding round. The capital will be used to develop infrastructure for issuing and trading shares
Share
Incrypted2026/01/23 00:13