TLDR Pavel Durov accuses French intelligence of influencing Moldova’s presidential elections through political censorship. French intelligence allegedly requested Telegram’s assistance in blocking specific political channels during the election. Durov claims French authorities offered to speak favorably about him in exchange for the censorship cooperation. Telegram remains committed to free speech and will not remove content [...] The post Telegram Founder Durov Exposes French Influence in Moldova’s Election Censorship appeared first on CoinCentral.TLDR Pavel Durov accuses French intelligence of influencing Moldova’s presidential elections through political censorship. French intelligence allegedly requested Telegram’s assistance in blocking specific political channels during the election. Durov claims French authorities offered to speak favorably about him in exchange for the censorship cooperation. Telegram remains committed to free speech and will not remove content [...] The post Telegram Founder Durov Exposes French Influence in Moldova’s Election Censorship appeared first on CoinCentral.

Telegram Founder Durov Exposes French Influence in Moldova’s Election Censorship

2025/09/30 00:16
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at [email protected]

TLDR

  • Pavel Durov accuses French intelligence of influencing Moldova’s presidential elections through political censorship.
  • French intelligence allegedly requested Telegram’s assistance in blocking specific political channels during the election.
  • Durov claims French authorities offered to speak favorably about him in exchange for the censorship cooperation.
  • Telegram remains committed to free speech and will not remove content for political reasons, says Durov.
  • Durov’s ongoing legal battles with French authorities continue to raise concerns about political interference.

Pavel Durov, the founder of Telegram, has accused French intelligence services of engaging in political censorship in Moldova. In a post to his 10 million Telegram subscribers, Durov claimed that the French government had attempted to influence Moldova’s presidential elections. The allegations suggest that French intelligence worked with Moldovan authorities to block specific Telegram channels.

French Intelligence Accused of Political Interference

Durov shared that while he was in Paris, French intelligence reached out to him indirectly. The agency allegedly requested that he assist Moldova’s government in blocking specific Telegram channels during the election. According to Durov, French authorities provided a list of flagged channels, which Telegram removed. Some of these channels, however, violated Telegram’s rules, Durov acknowledged.

But Durov claims that the removal of channels came with a disturbing condition. He said an intermediary made it clear that French intelligence would “say good things” about him to the judge handling his legal case. Durov, who has faced legal trouble in France, deemed the proposition unacceptable. “If they approached the judge, it would be an attempt to interfere in the judicial process,” he stated. Durov added that if the claim was false, it represented an exploitation of his legal situation to affect political outcomes in Moldova.

Telegram’s Commitment to Free Speech Amid Pressures

Durov emphasized Telegram’s dedication to free speech and its resistance to political censorship. He stated that Telegram would not remove content based solely on political motives. “We will not remove content for political reasons,” Durov assured.

The Telegram founder also noted the broader political context surrounding Moldova, a country often torn between pro-European and pro-Russian factions. He claimed that the pressure from both French and Moldovan authorities to censor political speech illustrated troubling political interference. Durov’s allegations underscore the growing trend of private platforms being used to suppress dissenting voices in politically sensitive regions.

Durov promised to expose any future attempts to pressure Telegram into political censorship. The Telegram team, he added, would continue to stand firm in defending the platform’s commitment to freedom of expression.

Ongoing Legal Disputes in France

Durov’s legal battles with French authorities have escalated in recent years. French police detained him for four days in August 2024, accusing Him of facilitating illegal activities through Telegram. These included money laundering, drug trafficking, and the distribution of harmful material. Durov rejected the charges, describing them as “unprecedented” and “absurd.”

Since then, Durov has remained entangled in legal processes, with a requirement to check in with the police twice weekly. Although Durov has been allowed to travel for short periods, his case has not progressed toward trial.

The post Telegram Founder Durov Exposes French Influence in Moldova’s Election Censorship appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
FreeRossDAO Logo
FreeRossDAO Price(FREE)
$0.00006009
$0.00006009$0.00006009
+0.73%
USD
FreeRossDAO (FREE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

SoFi taps BitGo to support distribution of its SoFiUSD stablecoin

SoFi taps BitGo to support distribution of its SoFiUSD stablecoin

The post SoFi taps BitGo to support distribution of its SoFiUSD stablecoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SoFi Technologies has selected BitGo Bank & Trust
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/06 01:50
The reality of today

The reality of today

It may take a long time to process and to reach the point of awakening. Then we discover what is important in life — the value of creating, giving, and contributing
Share
Bworldonline2026/03/06 00:02
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00