The post Miami Depends More On Messi Under Mascherano, For Better And Worse appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Inter Miami manager Javier Mascherano, left, talks to Lionel Messi #10 before entering the pitch during the 2025 Concacaf Champions Cup Round of 16 Second Leg match at Cavalier SC on March 13. Getty Images As Inter Miami tries to keep its hopes of repeating as Supporters’ Shield champions alive and then eyes a potential first MLS Cup title in the playoffs that follow, one clear pattern is emerging when comparing the Herons’ current team to that of 2024. Under first-year manager Javier Mascherano, this year’s version is far more reliant on Messi as a scorer. Yes, it would be weird if any team wasn’t at least somewhat reliant on a player whom many consider the greatest to ever play at the game. But the numbers this season compared to last suggest a Herons squad that isn’t nearly as good as turning to Plan B when Plan A of leaning on the eight-time Ballon d’Or winner scores doesn’t work out. Inter Miami’s 2024 record … When Messi scored: 8W-4D-1L When Messi didn’t score: 5W-2D-0L When Messi didn’t play: 9W-2D-3L Inter Miami’s 2025 record so far … When Messi scored: 13W-2D-1L When Messi didn’t score: 1W-4D-3L When Messi didn’t play: 2W-2D-2L Whether on purpose or by accident, it’s an impossible trend to shrug off how different the numbers are. Determining why that disparity has emerged – and even determining whether it’s even a negative – is more complicated. What Exactly Changed? The immediate impulse is to point out what else is different the difference in head coaching. Mascherano is in his first senior head coaching role. Previous gaffer Tata Martino was as experienced as they come. So you might infer that Martino was simply at utilizing his supplementary players and making adjustments when Messi had an off night or was unavailable.… The post Miami Depends More On Messi Under Mascherano, For Better And Worse appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Inter Miami manager Javier Mascherano, left, talks to Lionel Messi #10 before entering the pitch during the 2025 Concacaf Champions Cup Round of 16 Second Leg match at Cavalier SC on March 13. Getty Images As Inter Miami tries to keep its hopes of repeating as Supporters’ Shield champions alive and then eyes a potential first MLS Cup title in the playoffs that follow, one clear pattern is emerging when comparing the Herons’ current team to that of 2024. Under first-year manager Javier Mascherano, this year’s version is far more reliant on Messi as a scorer. Yes, it would be weird if any team wasn’t at least somewhat reliant on a player whom many consider the greatest to ever play at the game. But the numbers this season compared to last suggest a Herons squad that isn’t nearly as good as turning to Plan B when Plan A of leaning on the eight-time Ballon d’Or winner scores doesn’t work out. Inter Miami’s 2024 record … When Messi scored: 8W-4D-1L When Messi didn’t score: 5W-2D-0L When Messi didn’t play: 9W-2D-3L Inter Miami’s 2025 record so far … When Messi scored: 13W-2D-1L When Messi didn’t score: 1W-4D-3L When Messi didn’t play: 2W-2D-2L Whether on purpose or by accident, it’s an impossible trend to shrug off how different the numbers are. Determining why that disparity has emerged – and even determining whether it’s even a negative – is more complicated. What Exactly Changed? The immediate impulse is to point out what else is different the difference in head coaching. Mascherano is in his first senior head coaching role. Previous gaffer Tata Martino was as experienced as they come. So you might infer that Martino was simply at utilizing his supplementary players and making adjustments when Messi had an off night or was unavailable.…

Miami Depends More On Messi Under Mascherano, For Better And Worse

2025/09/30 08:56

Inter Miami manager Javier Mascherano, left, talks to Lionel Messi #10 before entering the pitch during the 2025 Concacaf Champions Cup Round of 16 Second Leg match at Cavalier SC on March 13.

Getty Images

As Inter Miami tries to keep its hopes of repeating as Supporters’ Shield champions alive and then eyes a potential first MLS Cup title in the playoffs that follow, one clear pattern is emerging when comparing the Herons’ current team to that of 2024.

Under first-year manager Javier Mascherano, this year’s version is far more reliant on Messi as a scorer.

Yes, it would be weird if any team wasn’t at least somewhat reliant on a player whom many consider the greatest to ever play at the game.

But the numbers this season compared to last suggest a Herons squad that isn’t nearly as good as turning to Plan B when Plan A of leaning on the eight-time Ballon d’Or winner scores doesn’t work out.


Inter Miami’s 2024 record …

  • When Messi scored: 8W-4D-1L
  • When Messi didn’t score: 5W-2D-0L
  • When Messi didn’t play: 9W-2D-3L

Inter Miami’s 2025 record so far …

  • When Messi scored: 13W-2D-1L
  • When Messi didn’t score: 1W-4D-3L
  • When Messi didn’t play: 2W-2D-2L

Whether on purpose or by accident, it’s an impossible trend to shrug off how different the numbers are.

Determining why that disparity has emerged – and even determining whether it’s even a negative – is more complicated.

What Exactly Changed?

The immediate impulse is to point out what else is different the difference in head coaching.

Mascherano is in his first senior head coaching role. Previous gaffer Tata Martino was as experienced as they come. So you might infer that Martino was simply at utilizing his supplementary players and making adjustments when Messi had an off night or was unavailable. And maybe that’s even true.

But there’s also more subtle factors that are as likely to be influential.

There’s the passage of time and the aging of Miami’s veteran core. While Messi hasn’t showed much sign of precipitous decline after turning 38 – and has also been healthier over the season so far than in 2024 – both Luis Suarez and Sergio Busquets have seemed to slide considerably from their 2024 levels. Busquets has already announced he’s retiring at the season’s end, and the 38-year-old Suarez’s future remains uncertain.

There’s also the turnover of Miami’s supplemental pieces, in general skewing away from those with MLS experience. Kamal Miller, Julian Gressel and Leonardo Campana are among those who were contributors to Miami during the 2024 season who were jettisoned since.

That could also trace back to the theory of the team being shaped more to Messi’s liking, with a plurality of the roster now having South American connections. But it’s also normal for an incoming manager and sporting director to have different ideas about personnel regardless of who the team’s star player is.

Pros And Cons

The drawbacks of having a team more reliant on a single 38-year-old are fairly obvious.

It makes earning consistent results over a long period more challenging, even when Messi is healthy. As prolific as he has been in 2025 – scoring an MLS-leading 24 goals and adding 14 assists in his 24 league appearances, even he can’t be expected to score in every match he plays. If Miami falls short of winning back-to-back Supporters’ Shield titles, that model of more reliance on Messi may be one reason to blame. And if he succumbs to any sort of injury for even a small portion of the playoffs, Miami’s postseason could be in real jeopardy.

But a game model that goes all in on your best player might actually be the better idea if your goal is to get hot at the right time. Knockout play is often more about determining who has the best positive momentum over a short period rather than who sustains excellence the longest.

The MLS Cup Playoff schedule also might bring less injury risk for Messi because the volume of matchesrelatively to time is less demanding. The championship-winning team could play as many as seven games total, but over a far more manageable stretch of roughly 40 days. Realisitically, Messi and Miami could win their first MLS Cup in only five matches between approximately Oct. 25 and the MLS Cup final on Dec. 6.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ianquillen/2025/09/29/miami-depends-more-on-messi-under-mascherano-for-better-and-worse/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX Presale Raises $7.5M as Solana Holds $243 and Avalanche Eyes $1B Treasury — Best Cryptos to Buy in 2025

BFX presale hits $7.5M with tokens at $0.024 and 30% bonus code BLOCK30, while Solana holds $243 and Avalanche builds a $1B treasury to attract institutions.
Share
Blockchainreporter2025/09/18 01:07
OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe

OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe

The post OCC Findings Suggest Major U.S. Banks Restricted Access for Digital Asset Firms Amid Debanking Probe appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) has confirmed that nine major U.S. banks engaged in debanking practices from 2020 to 2023, restricting access for digital asset firms and other sectors. This marks the first official acknowledgment of these policies, which limited services based on customer types, affecting crypto businesses significantly. OCC report highlights inappropriate distinctions by banks like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, targeting crypto and high-risk sectors. Nine banks reviewed showed similar policies restricting customer access without objective risk assessments. Impacted industries include digital asset firms, with potential referrals to the Attorney General for unlawful practices. Discover how major U.S. banks’ debanking policies hit crypto firms hard, per OCC’s 2025 report. Learn the implications for digital assets and what regulators are doing next—stay informed on banking risks today! What Are the OCC’s Findings on Banks Debanking Crypto Firms? Banks debanking crypto firms involves major financial institutions limiting or denying services to digital asset businesses based on perceived risks, as detailed in a recent Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) report. From 2020 to 2023, nine of the largest U.S. banks implemented policies that required escalated reviews or outright restrictions for certain customers, including those in the crypto sector. This practice, now publicly confirmed, underscores ongoing tensions between traditional banking and emerging digital asset industries. How Did These Debanking Practices Affect Digital Asset Companies? The OCC’s six-page report, released on Wednesday, revealed that institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bancorp, Capital One, PNC Financial Services Group, Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Bank of Montreal made distinctions among customers that were deemed inappropriate. For digital asset firms, this meant heightened scrutiny or complete denial of banking services, hindering operations in an already volatile market. The regulator noted that these policies spanned…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 11:01
Patriots Hall Of Famer Julian Edelman Is A Rising Media Star At FOX Sports

Patriots Hall Of Famer Julian Edelman Is A Rising Media Star At FOX Sports

The post Patriots Hall Of Famer Julian Edelman Is A Rising Media Star At FOX Sports appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Julian Edelman has a burgeoning media career, including as an analyst on FOX NFL Kickoff. Lily Hernandez The day before the Kansas City Chiefs hosted the Philadelphia Eagles, Julian Edelman was in a reflective mood. The last weekend he had spent in Arrowhead Stadium was when he helped the New England Patriots defeat the Chiefs in overtime to advance to the Patriots’ last Super Bowl. “I was definitely getting some flashbacks,” Edelman exclusively shared. “It’s definitely a special place to come. Not because we won (but) because we knew how hard it was to win here. This place rocks. Arrowhead is one of the most electric opponent stadiums that we played in. It was one of the greatest to be the villain.” Edelman had seven catches and 96 yards in that 37-31 overtime win against the Chiefs, paving the way for Super Bowl LIII, a game in which he won Super Bowl MVP. That may have been the apex of his playing career, which earned him induction into the Patriots’ Hall of Fame this weekend, but his post-NFL media career is ascending. He’s not only an analyst on FOX NFL Kickoff, the show that precedes FOX NFL Sunday, but also has his own production company and hosts two weekly podcasts. “It kind of (just) happened,” Edelman said. “My goal is really to just be around football in some form or fashion.” Julian Edelman of the New England Patriots celebrates after scoring in the fourth quarter against the Seattle Seahawks during Super Bowl XLIX. (Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images) Getty Images Toward the end of his playing career, Edelman started creating short-from content for his YouTube channel and picked up a cult following among New England fans. Then for his first two years out of the league, he was an…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 21:56