Kentucky’s chief legal officer Russell Coleman brought forth litigation in state court targeting two prominent prediction market operators, Kalshi and Polymarket. The legal complaints allege both platforms are conducting unauthorized sports wagering activities within state boundaries.
The legal documents also identify partner companies of Kalshi, specifically Coinbase, Robinhood, and Webull. Kentucky authorities contend these financial platforms neglected their legal obligation to offer resources for individuals struggling with gambling addiction, as mandated by state regulations.
Combined, the two platforms processed $25 billion in monthly transaction volume during May, based on Token Terminal data. Exclusion from significant U.S. markets could substantially impact their expansion trajectory.
Both Kalshi and Polymarket maintain they operate as federally supervised exchanges. Their position asserts that their event-based contracts qualify as swaps under federal commodities regulations, distinguishing them from sports wagers subject to state oversight.
The legal action creates a political paradox for Kentucky. The traditionally conservative state delivered 64% support to President Donald Trump in the 2024 election. Yet this lawsuit fundamentally opposes Trump’s declared position regarding prediction market oversight.
Trump has publicly advocated through Truth Social that the CFTC should maintain sole regulatory authority over prediction markets. He has used harsh language against state-level enforcement efforts, labeling opponents “SCUM” while praising CFTC Chairman Mike Selig.
Federal commodities regulators have launched legal challenges against eight states pursuing action against prediction platforms, contending these states exceed their jurisdictional boundaries. Kentucky may face similar federal litigation.
Coleman, a Republican who previously served as a Trump-appointed federal prosecutor, continues pursuing the case despite potential political ramifications.
Polymarket responded that Kentucky’s lawsuit “runs counter to the CFTC’s established framework.” The platform expressed readiness to defend against the allegations through judicial channels.
Court decisions have produced contradictory outcomes. Coinciding with Kentucky’s filing, a Michigan federal judge delivered an unfavorable ruling for Polymarket, determining its sports-related contracts fall outside federal commodities law protection.
Conversely, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals decided in April that New Jersey lacked authority to prevent Kalshi from offering sports event contracts within its jurisdiction.
A minimum of 17 additional states have initiated legal proceedings against prediction market platforms. Legal analysts anticipate the controversy will ultimately require U.S. Supreme Court resolution.
Previously, Kalshi and Polymarket had challenged Kentucky’s 14.25% levy on prediction market transaction fees, characterizing it as unfairly discriminatory.
Donald Trump Jr., the president’s son, serves on Polymarket’s advisory board and maintains an advisory relationship with Kalshi.
The post Kentucky Launches Legal Action Against Kalshi and Polymarket for Unauthorized Sports Wagering appeared first on Blockonomi.


