The post Hegseth Has Said No Beards, Will Limit Religious And Medical Waivers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth speaks to senior military leaders at Marine Corps Base Quantico on September 30, 2025 in Quantico, Virginia (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) Getty Images In his hour-long address on Tuesday to United States military leaders, including general officers, admirals and senior enlisted personnel, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth made clear that he expected to see nearly everyone serving in uniform clean-shaven. “Today, at my direction, the era of unprofessional appearance is over,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced on Tuesday in his speech at Quantico, Virginia. “No more beardos. The age of rampant and ridiculous shaving profiles is done.” Hegseth has been critical of the religious waivers and doubled down on that sentiment, telling the hundreds of senior officials, “We don’t have a military full of Nordic Pagans. But unfortunately, we have leaders who either refused to call B.S. and enforce standards, or leaders who felt that they were not allowed to enforce standards. Both are unacceptable.” The DoD has since posted multiple memos that announced the new guidelines for facial hair, stating that it will revert to pre-2010 standards, when facial hair waivers were “not generally authorized.” The History Of Beards In The Military The wearing of beards, some that would be impressive by modern hipster standards, was commonplace in the latter half of the 19th century. Beards were associated with power, authority, and masculinity, and were often seen as a mark of a “true man.” Moreover, throughout Europe and later in the United States, military recruits would often be clean-shaven, in part because they tended to be on the young side. However, they’d return home from major conflicts with full, thick beards, which were then seen as a mark of heroism. Beards became a common feature among explorers, big-game hunters, and outdoorsmen. General… The post Hegseth Has Said No Beards, Will Limit Religious And Medical Waivers appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth speaks to senior military leaders at Marine Corps Base Quantico on September 30, 2025 in Quantico, Virginia (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) Getty Images In his hour-long address on Tuesday to United States military leaders, including general officers, admirals and senior enlisted personnel, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth made clear that he expected to see nearly everyone serving in uniform clean-shaven. “Today, at my direction, the era of unprofessional appearance is over,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced on Tuesday in his speech at Quantico, Virginia. “No more beardos. The age of rampant and ridiculous shaving profiles is done.” Hegseth has been critical of the religious waivers and doubled down on that sentiment, telling the hundreds of senior officials, “We don’t have a military full of Nordic Pagans. But unfortunately, we have leaders who either refused to call B.S. and enforce standards, or leaders who felt that they were not allowed to enforce standards. Both are unacceptable.” The DoD has since posted multiple memos that announced the new guidelines for facial hair, stating that it will revert to pre-2010 standards, when facial hair waivers were “not generally authorized.” The History Of Beards In The Military The wearing of beards, some that would be impressive by modern hipster standards, was commonplace in the latter half of the 19th century. Beards were associated with power, authority, and masculinity, and were often seen as a mark of a “true man.” Moreover, throughout Europe and later in the United States, military recruits would often be clean-shaven, in part because they tended to be on the young side. However, they’d return home from major conflicts with full, thick beards, which were then seen as a mark of heroism. Beards became a common feature among explorers, big-game hunters, and outdoorsmen. General…

Hegseth Has Said No Beards, Will Limit Religious And Medical Waivers

U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth speaks to senior military leaders at Marine Corps Base Quantico on September 30, 2025 in Quantico, Virginia (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Getty Images

In his hour-long address on Tuesday to United States military leaders, including general officers, admirals and senior enlisted personnel, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth made clear that he expected to see nearly everyone serving in uniform clean-shaven.

“Today, at my direction, the era of unprofessional appearance is over,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced on Tuesday in his speech at Quantico, Virginia. “No more beardos. The age of rampant and ridiculous shaving profiles is done.”

Hegseth has been critical of the religious waivers and doubled down on that sentiment, telling the hundreds of senior officials, “We don’t have a military full of Nordic Pagans. But unfortunately, we have leaders who either refused to call B.S. and enforce standards, or leaders who felt that they were not allowed to enforce standards. Both are unacceptable.”

The DoD has since posted multiple memos that announced the new guidelines for facial hair, stating that it will revert to pre-2010 standards, when facial hair waivers were “not generally authorized.”

The History Of Beards In The Military

The wearing of beards, some that would be impressive by modern hipster standards, was commonplace in the latter half of the 19th century. Beards were associated with power, authority, and masculinity, and were often seen as a mark of a “true man.”

Moreover, throughout Europe and later in the United States, military recruits would often be clean-shaven, in part because they tended to be on the young side. However, they’d return home from major conflicts with full, thick beards, which were then seen as a mark of heroism. Beards became a common feature among explorers, big-game hunters, and outdoorsmen.

General Ulysses Simpson Grant (1822 – 1885) was far from the only officer to wear a beard in the American Civil War (Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

Getty Images

Those points may have been lost on Secretary Hegseth, who has called for the United States military to return a “warrior ethos.” In other words, what could be more symbolic of a modern warrior than a full beard?

The End Of Beards

It was only in the First World War, with its horrific trench warfare that spread lice and disease, that military leaders began to see the benefits of short hair and a clean-shaven face. Until that point, it was actually understood that beards were seen as protection from the weather, but could also serve as a respiratory system to keep out bad air and dust.

With the introduction of poison gas, soldiers needed to don gas masks that fit close to the skin, and it was found that being clean-shaven helped create a tighter seal. That is even truer today, as gas mask technology has undergone significant improvements. A beard can impair the effectiveness of chemical and biological protection systems.

Following the conflict, the troops returned home clean-shaven, while only the senior officers, who had spent the conflict safely behind the lines, kept their beards. That diminished the idea that a beard was a symbol of heroism.

That resulted in changing fashion trends, and in the UK, King George V was the last monarch to have a full beard. By the time of the Second World War, beards were entirely out of fashion, even among the highest-ranking officials.

Medical Waivers Now Limited To A Year

Although beards are far less common in the U.S. military, there have been exceptions to the rule. Now those rules may be tightening. Even before Hegseth’s address on September 30, the Pentagon had issued new guidance that called for significantly reducing the number of medical waivers.

“Unit commanders will initiate separation of service members who require a shaving waiver after more than 1 year of medical treatment,” Hegseth wrote in an August 20, 2025, memo to senior military leadership. “The grooming standard set by the U.S. military is to be clean-shaven and neat in presentation for a proper military appearance.”

This policy isn’t a significant change, as beards had been banned for decades, with leaders arguing that they looked unprofessional and interfered with gas masks and oxygen masks. However, a waiver has been granted for those who suffer from pseudofolliculitis barbae, also known as PFB or razor bumps. The skin condition, which is caused by ingrown hairs and can make shaving painful, is more common among Black men.

Instead of permanent waivers, evaluations will be conducted annually and may not be extended beyond that period. The message was to cut the beard or be cut from the service.

Religious Waivers Also Got Shaved!

Hegseth’s comment about “Nordic Pagans” may have sounded like a throwaway joke, but it may have been carefully directed. It was during President Donald Trump’s first term that Sgt. 1st Class Benjamin Hopper, then a member of the Nevada Army National Guard’s 3665th Ordnance Company, was granted a beard waiver, as he claimed to practice “Norse paganism,” which encourages the growth of a beard, or “skegg.”

There aren’t many Nordic Pagans, but Hegseth may be looking to counter other religious waivers, which have increasingly been granted to Sikhs, Muslims, and Jews, all of whom may wear beards for religious reasons.

U.S. Army Captain Kamaljeet Singh Kalsi was allowed to serve while wearing his turban and beard, as it was required by his faith. (Photo by TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images)

AFP via Getty Images

Hegseth’s recent memos have indicated that the U.S. military will still allow those religious exceptions, but troops will need to provide documentation that shows “the sincerity of their religious or sincerely held belief.” Moreover, it stated, “Approvals will be limited to non-deployable roles with low risk of chemical attack or firefighting requirements.”

One Big Beard Exception

There may be some irony that approvals for beards would be limited to “non-deployable roles,” as Hegseth also stated, “If you want a beard, you can join Special Forces. If not, then shave.”

That begs the question of why the elite forces don’t need a waiver, and instead are simply allowed to grow beards.

U.S. Army Special Forces soldier nicknamed “Cowboy” secures an airstrip during an operation August 28, 2002 in the town of Taloquan in Northern Afghanistan. Beards like his could still be allowed for Special Forces (Photo by Scott Nelson/Getty Images)

Getty Images

The standard argument is that United States Special Forces grow beards to facilitate camouflage, but the facial hair also serves as a means of “cultural integration.” Beards enable personnel to blend in with local populations, particularly in Afghanistan and Iraq, where beards are common and often signal trust.

It has been further suggested that beards can filter dust and provide warmth, beliefs not all that dissimilar from those of the 19th century.

Yet, if those reasons are acceptable, it would seem odd that medical waivers are being scrutinized, not to mention the religious exemptions.

Finally, as the United States military pivots to great power competition and sees a potential war with China in the future, the argument for allowing Special Forces to wear beards but not other warfighters seems questionable. Beards are far from commonplace in China and other parts of East Asia. It could make those personnel stand out rather than blend in.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/petersuciu/2025/10/04/hegseth-has-said-no-beards-will-limit-religious-and-medical-waivers/

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Hits ‘Extreme Fear’ Levels - Why This Is Secretly Bullish

XRP Hits ‘Extreme Fear’ Levels - Why This Is Secretly Bullish

Ripple’s native token XRP is still battling out with the bears at the $1.90 territory on Friday afternoon. The support-turned-resistance at $1.90 is particularly
Share
Coinstats2026/01/24 03:25
Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Metaplanet Inc., the Japanese public company known for its bitcoin treasury, is launching a Miami subsidiary to run a dedicated derivatives and income strategy aimed at turning holdings into steady, U.S.-based cash flow. Japanese Bitcoin Treasury Player Metaplanet Opens Miami Outpost The new entity, Metaplanet Income Corp., sits under Metaplanet Holdings, Inc. and is based […]
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:32
The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now

The post The GENIUS Act Is Already Law. Banks Shouldn’t Try to Rewrite It Now appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Healthy competition drives innovation and better products for consumers; it is at the center of American economic leadership. Unfortunately, now that the bipartisan GENIUS Act has been signed into law, major legacy financial institutions seem to be having second thoughts about the innovations that stablecoins can bring to financial markets. Bank lobbying groups and public affairs teams have been peppering Congress with complaints about the law, urging members to reopen debate and introduce changes to the legislation that will ensure the stablecoin market doesn’t grow too quickly, protecting banks’ profits and stifling consumer choice. This reactionary response is both overblown and unnecessary. What legacy financial firms should do instead is embrace competition and offer exciting new products and services that consumers want, not try to kneecap emerging players through anti-innovation rules and regulations. The GENIUS Act was carefully designed with a thorough bipartisan process to strengthen consumer safeguards, ensure regulatory oversight, and preserve financial stability. Efforts to roll back its provisions are less about protecting families and more about protecting entrenched banking interests from the competition that helps ensure the U.S. banking system stays the strongest and most innovative in the world. Critics warn that allowing stablecoins to provide rewards could lead to massive deposit outflows from community banks, with figures as high as $6.6 trillion cited. But closer examination shows this fear is unfounded. A July 2025 analysis by consulting firm Charles River Associates found no statistically significant relationship between stablecoin adoption and community bank deposit outflows. In fact, the overwhelming majority of stablecoin reserves remain in the traditional financial system — either in commercial bank accounts or in short-term Treasuries — where they continue to support liquidity and credit in the broader U.S. economy. The dire estimates rely on unrealistic assumptions that every dollar of stablecoin issuance permanently…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 09:39