The post Vitalik pushes for zk anonymous voting amidst social threats appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Vitalik Buterin is advocating for the use of zk anonymous voting mechanisms to protect lawmaker identities in governance rulings, citing its ability to protect voters from threats of violence. Summary Vitalik Buterin advocated for anonymous decision-making to protect officials from retaliation and bias. Buterin highlighted the role of zero-knowledge proofs in enabling anonymous yet verifiable voting on blockchain. The technology has been used in the past to protect voter identity. In a Farcaster post, the Ethereum co-founder spotlighted a recent incident involving South Carolina Circuit Court judge Diane Goodstein’s house which was burned down after weeks of receiving death threats. Goodstein had reportedly blocked the Trump administration from gaining access to voter files. The decision was openly criticized by Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon and later reversed by the state Supreme Court. Reflecting on the incident, Vitalik Buterin emphasized the importance of making major decision votes anonymous in order to protect public officials from the inevitable backlash that could arise from the opposing side. In the past, Buterin has also advocated for secret-ballot general assembly votes in the United Nations. He believes that the mechanism would allow countries to choose their own representative and let them make decisions based on their own conscience without external pressure. He argued that more governance decisions should be made through anonymous voting mechanisms. He has also emphasized the potential of zero-knowledge reputation systems, identity verification, and credential management in improving privacy and security with regards to how personal information is managed. “This situation is a good argument for judges’ identities being hidden (!!) when they make their rulings. The function of a judge is to rule according to the facts as interpreted through their conscience, not to be “accountable” to violent mobs,” said Buterin in his recent post. Vitalik: ‘zk wizard… The post Vitalik pushes for zk anonymous voting amidst social threats appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Vitalik Buterin is advocating for the use of zk anonymous voting mechanisms to protect lawmaker identities in governance rulings, citing its ability to protect voters from threats of violence. Summary Vitalik Buterin advocated for anonymous decision-making to protect officials from retaliation and bias. Buterin highlighted the role of zero-knowledge proofs in enabling anonymous yet verifiable voting on blockchain. The technology has been used in the past to protect voter identity. In a Farcaster post, the Ethereum co-founder spotlighted a recent incident involving South Carolina Circuit Court judge Diane Goodstein’s house which was burned down after weeks of receiving death threats. Goodstein had reportedly blocked the Trump administration from gaining access to voter files. The decision was openly criticized by Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon and later reversed by the state Supreme Court. Reflecting on the incident, Vitalik Buterin emphasized the importance of making major decision votes anonymous in order to protect public officials from the inevitable backlash that could arise from the opposing side. In the past, Buterin has also advocated for secret-ballot general assembly votes in the United Nations. He believes that the mechanism would allow countries to choose their own representative and let them make decisions based on their own conscience without external pressure. He argued that more governance decisions should be made through anonymous voting mechanisms. He has also emphasized the potential of zero-knowledge reputation systems, identity verification, and credential management in improving privacy and security with regards to how personal information is managed. “This situation is a good argument for judges’ identities being hidden (!!) when they make their rulings. The function of a judge is to rule according to the facts as interpreted through their conscience, not to be “accountable” to violent mobs,” said Buterin in his recent post. Vitalik: ‘zk wizard…

Vitalik pushes for zk anonymous voting amidst social threats

Vitalik Buterin is advocating for the use of zk anonymous voting mechanisms to protect lawmaker identities in governance rulings, citing its ability to protect voters from threats of violence.

Summary

  • Vitalik Buterin advocated for anonymous decision-making to protect officials from retaliation and bias.
  • Buterin highlighted the role of zero-knowledge proofs in enabling anonymous yet verifiable voting on blockchain. The technology has been used in the past to protect voter identity.

In a Farcaster post, the Ethereum co-founder spotlighted a recent incident involving South Carolina Circuit Court judge Diane Goodstein’s house which was burned down after weeks of receiving death threats. Goodstein had reportedly blocked the Trump administration from gaining access to voter files.

The decision was openly criticized by Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon and later reversed by the state Supreme Court.

Reflecting on the incident, Vitalik Buterin emphasized the importance of making major decision votes anonymous in order to protect public officials from the inevitable backlash that could arise from the opposing side.

In the past, Buterin has also advocated for secret-ballot general assembly votes in the United Nations. He believes that the mechanism would allow countries to choose their own representative and let them make decisions based on their own conscience without external pressure.

He argued that more governance decisions should be made through anonymous voting mechanisms. He has also emphasized the potential of zero-knowledge reputation systems, identity verification, and credential management in improving privacy and security with regards to how personal information is managed.

“This situation is a good argument for judges’ identities being hidden (!!) when they make their rulings. The function of a judge is to rule according to the facts as interpreted through their conscience, not to be “accountable” to violent mobs,” said Buterin in his recent post.

Vitalik: ‘zk wizard tech solutions for social problems’

In a separate post, Vitalik Buterin underlined zero-knowledge technology’s role in ensuring voter anonymity through the blockchain. He observed that acts of violence perpetuated by and against state actors has been on the rise recently, therefore such measures should be considered.

“Today this stuff sounds crazy and “why is the crypto bro pushing zk wizard tech solutions to a social problem”, but in the 2020s age of easy physical retaliation (including by foreign adversary states), I think we’ll see such ideas enter the overton window more,” said Vitalik Buterin.

Zero-knowledge proofs are the core foundation of zk-based voting systems. They allow voters to prove that they can satisfy certain conditions without revealing the voter’s identity or how they voted. The voting system can verify eligibility via cryptographic statements without leaking personal information.

For instance, projects such as “Distributed Anonymous e-Voting” use zk-SNARKs and Merkle trees to ensure that voter identity in a way that the voter can later use to prove membership in the set of eligible voters without revealing their identity.

Back in April 2025, a New York assemblyman filed a bill pushing for the use of blockchain technology to protect voters’ data during U.S. elections. Such a concept has also been used in the past by countries like Georgia, which saw its opposition party launching an identity app powered by Rarimo’s Freedom Tool.

The app was meant to protect voters’ identity during national elections to address concerns of privacy violation and prevent voter manipulation. The system would bar outside parties, including the government, from tracking on-app user activities.

Source: https://crypto.news/vitalik-pushes-for-zk-anonymous-voting-amidst-social-threats/

Market Opportunity
ZKsync Logo
ZKsync Price(ZK)
$0.03043
$0.03043$0.03043
-2.53%
USD
ZKsync (ZK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Ripple (XRP) CEO Brad Garlinghouse Makes Another Statement Regarding the Anticipated US Cryptocurrency Legislation

Ripple (XRP) CEO Brad Garlinghouse Makes Another Statement Regarding the Anticipated US Cryptocurrency Legislation

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse, in his latest statement, once again expressed his support for the cryptocurrency legislation being debated in the US. Continue Reading
Share
Coinstats2026/01/22 05:30
Trump Dismisses Stock Market Dip as Minor While Solana and XRP Stand to Gain

Trump Dismisses Stock Market Dip as Minor While Solana and XRP Stand to Gain

Trump calls stock market dip “peanuts” and predicts big gains for Solana and XRP, despite recent market volatility and geopolitical tensions. President Donald Trump
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/01/22 06:00