Key Takeaways: Switzerland’s gambling regulator Gespa is investigating FIFA’s blockchain “Right-to-Buy” tokens for possible violations of national gambling laws. The tokens, priced up to $999 each, grant holders a conditional The post Swiss Regulator Probes FIFA’s $15M Blockchain Tokens Over Suspected Gambling Risks appeared first on CryptoNinjas.Key Takeaways: Switzerland’s gambling regulator Gespa is investigating FIFA’s blockchain “Right-to-Buy” tokens for possible violations of national gambling laws. The tokens, priced up to $999 each, grant holders a conditional The post Swiss Regulator Probes FIFA’s $15M Blockchain Tokens Over Suspected Gambling Risks appeared first on CryptoNinjas.

Swiss Regulator Probes FIFA’s $15M Blockchain Tokens Over Suspected Gambling Risks

Key Takeaways:

  • Switzerland’s gambling regulator Gespa is investigating FIFA’s blockchain “Right-to-Buy” tokens for possible violations of national gambling laws.
  • The tokens, priced up to $999 each, grant holders a conditional right to buy tickets for the 2026 World Cup but only if their chosen team qualifies.
  • Critics warn the scheme resembles a lottery-like gamble, with most token holders likely ending up with assets of little or no value.

Switzerland’s gambling watchdog Gespa has opened a preliminary probe into FIFA’s new blockchain-based ticketing system, questioning whether the global football body’s “Right-to-Buy” (RTB) tokens cross into gambling territory. The move comes after the tokens raised around $15 million in sales within months of launch.

fifa

Launched in 2024, the RTB tokens were designed to modernize how fans access World Cup tickets using blockchain technology. Each token represents the right to purchase tickets for matches at the 2026 World Cup but only if a buyer’s national team qualifies for those games.

Holders of these NFTs can trade them on FIFA’s official marketplace, creating a secondary speculative market. Of the 51 participating nations, tokens for eight teams have already sold out, including high-profile sides like Brazil and England.

However, Gespa director Manuel Richard confirmed that regulators are not yet satisfied the product falls outside gambling law.

“It cannot be ruled out that the offering on collect.fifa.com may be relevant under gambling legislation,” Richard told Bloomberg.
“We will now proceed with additional fact-finding to determine whether regulatory action is required.”

The regulator clarified that no formal complaints were filed before the inquiry, but the model’s structure itself raised enough legal uncertainty to merit investigation.

Read More: Florida AG Launches Crypto Probe: Robinhood’s ‘Lowest Cost’ Claim Under Fire

When Blockchain Collectibles Start to Look Like Betting

A New Form of Speculative Fan Engagement

The RTB tokens that FIFA offers are an amalgamation of digital ownership, scarcity and conditional rewards that have led to both innovation and controversy in the crypto industry. The customers also pay to have the opportunity to purchase the tickets in case their team wins. Otherwise, they are left with an electronic collectible that has extremely low resale value.

Critics believe that this type of arrangement is like lottery or performance depending on what transpired. As financial analysts claim, this can disorient digital collectibles and authorized games of chance.

Crypto analyst Marc Steiner told SwissInfo that FIFA’s model “introduces speculative behavior under the guise of digital fandom,” adding that “the loss ratio could exceed 80% if most teams fail to qualify.”

Others highlight concerns about transparency and fairness:

  • Token buyers have no guaranteed return or clear disclosure on winning odds.
  • Tokens tied to stronger teams sell at higher prices, implying a market-driven betting element.
  • Secondary trading could amplify price volatility, creating risks similar to gambling markets.

Regulatory Uncertainty in Crypto Ticketing

Gespa’s Inquiry Could Set a Global Precedent

Gespa in Switzerland is also known to be very strict with regards to the traditional and online gambling. In case the investigation establishes that FIFA blockchain ticketing system is in breach of the Swiss law, the enforcement procedures, e.g. sales suspension or bans of access by the Swiss domains, may commence.

fifa-board

Legal observers suggest that other countries, especially EU members and the U.S. may follow suit with their own reviews. “If Switzerland classifies RTB tokens as gambling, other jurisdictions will likely adopt similar stances,” said crypto policy researcher Anna Keller.

This would pose a major challenge to FIFA’s Web3 ambitions, as the organization has positioned the 2026 World Cup as a test case for blockchain-based fan engagement, including NFTs, digital collectibles, and metaverse integrations.

Read More: Argentina’s $250M Crypto Scandal Deepens: Milei Shuts Down Probe Into $LIBRA Meltdown

Financial Stakes and Industry Reactions

A $15 Million Experiment with Big Risks

Internal estimates suggest FIFA has already earned some amount of roughly $15 million through the sale of tokens, which is a tiny portion of its expected $11 billion total World Cup revenues but big by crypto standards.

There have been mixed reactions by industry:

  • Supporters argue that the RTB tokens represent a modern loyalty tool, enhancing engagement among global fans.
  • Critics counter that it’s an unregulated lottery disguised as innovation, exposing consumers to financial losses.
  • Some blockchain supporters caution that FIFA model will cause a bad reputation to crypto by linking NFTs with the act of speculative gambling.

The executives of crypto exchanges also observe that the outcome of the investigation into Gespa may affect further NFT ticketing systems, especially services associated with sports, music, and entertainment events based on conditional or randomized rewards.

The post Swiss Regulator Probes FIFA’s $15M Blockchain Tokens Over Suspected Gambling Risks appeared first on CryptoNinjas.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking Kenya Token Scam Takes Over Crypto Twitter

Shocking Kenya Token Scam Takes Over Crypto Twitter

The post Shocking Kenya Token Scam Takes Over Crypto Twitter appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Kenya’s former Prime Minister was apparently hacked to promote a scam token project. The announcement post on his X profile was deleted, and its video was almost certainly a deepfake. The project’s name and branding closely resemble another semi-official project with glaring red flags. This confusing quagmire raises many remaining questions. Sponsored Sponsored What is Kenya Token? Kenya has an underrated presence in the international crypto community, with pockets of grassroots adoption and major business partnerships conducted by the government. However, the new “Kenya Token” apparently tried to profit from this situation rather than contribute to it. Faked Kenya Token Announcement. Source: X Raila Odinga, the country’s former Prime Minister, was apparently hacked to announce the Kenya Token project. Soon after, though, it was removed, prompting concerns about a hack. Comparing the accompanying video to Odinga’s actual speaking voice, it seems extremely likely that this post was an AI-generated deepfake. The scam may have fallen apart, but there are many unanswered questions. These red flags could be an important lesson, especially as scam prevention techniques are failing the community. Who’s Behind This Scam? Sponsored Sponsored For example, analysts discovered a massive level of insider bundling with Kenya Digital Token (KDT). This is a totally separate asset apparently endorsed by sitting government officials, so the scam project may have tried to piggyback on KDT’s branding. Even this semi-official project was covered in red flags, however. Immediately after one KDT wallet conducted a TGE, 141 other accounts sniped 20% of the total supply. The site marketed these tokens as “locked for the people,” but they’re in private hands. Kenya Digital Token (KDT) is heavily bundled 150 connected addresses own 20% of the supply – worth $60M “Locked for the people” pic.twitter.com/vCVtq1WCRc — Bubblemaps (@bubblemaps) July 11, 2025 This led the community to…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 06:40
VIRTUAL Weekly Analysis Jan 21

VIRTUAL Weekly Analysis Jan 21

The post VIRTUAL Weekly Analysis Jan 21 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. VIRTUAL closed the week up 3.57% at $0.84, but the long-term downtrend maintains its
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 06:54
China’s post-Nvidia future gets Huawei chip tech boost

China’s post-Nvidia future gets Huawei chip tech boost

Huawei publicly revealed its full chip roadmap on Thursday during its annual Connect conference in Shanghai, confirming it would begin releasing some of the world’s most powerful computing systems in a push to reduce China’s reliance on Nvidia and other foreign chipmakers, according to Reuters. Eric Xu, Huawei’s rotating chairman, disclosed that the company had […]
Share
Cryptopolitan2025/09/18 20:54